Is Preoperative Urodynamics Essential for Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse (urodynaemics)

July 30, 2021 updated by: Mervit Sersy, Alexandria University

Is Urodynamic Study an Essential Step in Preoperative Evaluation of Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse With Urinary Tract Dysfunction: Prospective Comparative Study

urodynamic investigation when added in the diagnostic work-up of women with lower urinary tract dysfunction with POP is debatable.

This study was planned to determine the usefulness of preoperative urodynamic study in improving urological outcome following surgery in women with pelvic organ prolapse and urinary tract dysfunction.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

60 patients, fulfilled the selection criteria were counseled and informed about the trial protocol and a written consent according to declaration of Helsinki was signed. Participants were randomly assigned following simple randomization procedures (computerized random numbers) to group (1) or group (2). Each group consisted of 30 patients. All participants had been thoroughly evaluated by history and examination. A standardized questionnaire was obtained to evaluate the symptoms of stress urinary incontinence, urge urinary incontinence and obstructive symptoms. Clinical staging of pelvic organ prolapse by POP Q Staging. Ultrasound examination had been also carried out to rule out any pelvic pathology. Patients had completed a 3-day bladder diary (frequency volume chart) to assist in arriving at an urodynamic diagnosis. Urinalysis was performed. Only patients allocated for group 1 were subjected to urodynamic studies before surgical intervention and then corrective procedures for POP had been done .The Urodynamic studies carried out were : uroflowmetry and cystometry. The Uroflowmetry was performed by the gravimeter method, where maximum flow rate, average flow rate, voided volume and residual urine was measured. Maximum flow rate ≤15 ml/sec, and/or residual urine of more than 50 ml or 10% of voided volume in a bladder filled with a minimum of 150 ml was taken as cut off to detect abnormal voiding. Cystometric parameters which indicated normal bladder function were first desire to void between 150 and 200 ml, capacity (taken as strong desire to void) of greater than 400 ml, detrusor pressure rise on filling of less than 15 mm H2O per 500 ml infused, absence of detrusor contractions, no leakage on coughing, no significant pain on filling and finally a detrusor pressure rises on voiding (maximum voiding pressure) of less than 50 cm H2O, with a peak flow rate of more than 15 ml/s for a voided volume over 150 ml. Urodynamic stress incontinence was diagnosed when urethral leakage was seen with increased abdominal pressure, in the absence of detrusor contractions. Detrusor over activity was diagnosed when the patient has involuntary detrusor contractions during filling with or without leakage which may be spontaneous or provoked. All participants were followed-up with same questionnaire and clinical examination after 12 weeks post operatively.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • El-Khartoum Square
      • Alexandria, El-Khartoum Square, Egypt, 21131
        • Shatby maternity university hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

performed in Shatby Maternity University hospital, which is considered the largest hospital in Alexandria city in Egypt offering obstetrical and gynecological services for more than three millions females

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- pelvic organ prolapse associated with lower urinary tract dysfunction.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • are those who had previous surgery for urinary incontinence, or experienced neurological disorder such as multiple sclerosis or spinal cord injuries were not included. Or had complicated medical disease that made the patient unfit for anesthesia.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
(1) URODYNAEMICS GROUP
30 patients allocated for group (1) had been thoroughly evaluated by history and examination. A standardized questionnaire was obtained to evaluate the symptoms of stress urinary incontinence, urge urinary incontinence and obstructive symptoms. Clinical staging of pelvic organ prolapse by POP Q Staging .Ultrasound examination had been also carried out to rule out any pelvic pathology. Patients had completed a 3-day bladder diary (frequency volume chart) to assist in arriving at an urodynamic diagnosis. Urinalysis was performed. And to urodynamic studies were performed before surgical intervention and then corrective procedures for POP had been done uroflowmetry and cystometry. All participants were followed-up with same questionnaire and clinical examination after 12 weeks post -operatively
The Urodynamic studies carried out were : uroflowmetry and cystometry. The Uroflowmetry was performed by the gravimetric method Detrusor over activity was diagnosed when the patient has involuntary detrusor contractions during filling with or without leakage which may be spontaneous or provoked,
(2)NON URODYNAMICS GROUP
30 patients allocated for group (2) had been thoroughly evaluated by history and examination. A standardized questionnaire was obtained to evaluate the symptoms of stress urinary incontinence, urge urinary incontinence and obstructive symptoms. Clinical staging of pelvic organ prolapse by POP Q Staging .Ultrasound examination had been also carried out to rule out any pelvic pathology. Patients had completed a 3-day bladder diary (frequency volume chart) to assist in arriving at an urodynamic diagnosis. Urinalysis was performed and then corrective procedures for POP had been done.All participants were followed-up with same questionnaire and clinical examination after 12 weeks post-- operatively

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
urological outcome following surgery in women with pelvic organ prolapse and urinary tract dysfunction.
Time Frame: 3months
persistence of urinary incontinence
3months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mervat AM Elsersy, MD, Alexandria University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 20, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 18, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

July 28, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 6, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2021

Last Verified

July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 0304824

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

all individual participant data that underlie results in a publication

IPD Sharing Time Frame

starting 6 months after publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researcher of the same institution

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe