- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04986800
Providing Access To Innovative & Evidence-Based Intervention (PROACTIVE)
PROACTIVE Parent: Providing Access To Innovative & Evidence-Based Intervention
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
PROACTIVE Parent is an educational program designed to improve parent knowledge, capacity and confidence to more effectively manage child behavior and social and emotional needs in children with depressive symptoms. PROACTIVE Parent (Providing Access To Innovative & Evidence-Based Intervention) is a new service delivery model that uses telehealth methodology to educate parents about their child's mental health (MH) symptoms and treatment, teach parents skills to promote a safe, regulated environment for their youth, and teach parents how to work with their child's therapists to support treatment goals at home and in the community. PROACTIVE Parent will teach parents the function of child behavior, the role of symptomatology in child behaviors, and strategies to promote effective behavior management and healthy coping. Parents will also learn skills to manage their own emotional dysregulation to promote calm parental responding and promote healthy parent-child interaction and communication.
The PROACTIVE Parent model is ideally suited to promote parent's active management of child MH care. Children depend on parents to navigate a complex system of care and support children's coping in the home and community. However, parents may not know how to navigate appropriate treatments, how to communicate with their child's therapist to support treatment goals in the home, or how to interact with their child in a way that supports positive mental health outcomes. These parents require a service model that builds parent capacity to manage their child's MH care. The conceptual framework for the proposed work draws on the concept of parent activation and engagement in their child's MH care, and regulating affect. Activation refers to the parent's knowledge, capacity, and commitment to manage their child's MH care. Engagement refers to actions parents take to manage their child's care. Emotion regulation skills help parents to manage their affect, to engage in calm responding to children's needs and assist children in regulating affect.
PROACTIVE Parent is delivered in weekly 30-minute telehealth coaching sessions over the course of 10 weeks. Parent coaches use motivational interviewing and psychoeducation to improve parent activation and management of their child's MH care. Parent coaches provide parent-training and evidence-based skills training to promote effective parent behavior, healthy coping, and positive parent-child interaction. The parent coach will deliver the PROACTIVE Parent model via telehealth with supplemental online resources, using a publically available service referral system to connect parents to evidence-based treatments and MH providers if needed.
The investigators will recruit Foster Parents of youth in care aged 8 - 13 years, with symptoms or history of depression to examine acceptability, feasibility and preliminary effectiveness of the PROACTIVE Parent program.
The Aims of this project include an open trial, and exploration of the relationship between parent activation and youth MH outcomes.
Aim 1: Conduct a pilot study to test acceptability, utility, feasibility, and preliminary effectiveness. The primary outcomes include: 1) Acceptability, 2) Usefulness, and 3) Feasibility (all measured by post-session questions and post-intervention Customer Satisfaction Survey; Feasibility will also include number of people referred who meet eligibility, number of parents who enroll after referral, time to complete assessments). Aim 2: Assess the preliminary effectiveness of the model to improve parent activation, and empowerment. Aim 3: Assess the preliminary effectiveness to reduce the number, severity, and frequency of child MH symptoms and maladaptive behaviors. Aim 4: Assess preliminary effectiveness of improving parent scores on the DERS and barriers to treatment participation.
If the PROACTIVE Parent model demonstrates feasibility and effectiveness, it could serve as a model for scaling up to a population-based approach to MH treatment for all children.
Study Type
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
- Northwestern University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria
- Foster parent of child aged 8 - 13 years old with mental health symptoms
- Has access to a device and internet to allow videoconferencing or phone coaching
Exclusion Criteria
- Not currently parenting a child with symptoms or history of depression
- Does not speak English
- Does not have access to a device and internet to allow videoconferencing or phone coaching
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention Group
Participants in the Intervention Group will receive up to 10 sessions of the PROACTIVE Parent intervention.
|
PROACTIVE Parent will educate parents about their child's mental health symptoms and treatment, how to talk to the child's therapist to support treatment goals at home and in the community.
PROACTIVE Parent will teach parents the function of child behavior, the role of symptomatology in child behaviors, and strategies to promote effective behavior management and healthy coping.
Parents will also learn skills to manage their own emotional dysregulation to promote calm parental responding and promote healthy parent-child interaction and communication.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time Frame: baseline
|
The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) is an 8-item scale with response options ranging from 1 - 4. Total scores range from 8 -32.
Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction.
Assesses the extent to which parents found the intervention helpful, relevant, feasible, and effective.
|
baseline
|
|
Client Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time Frame: 11 weeks
|
The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ) is an 8-item scale with response options ranging from 1 - 4. Total scores range from 8 -32.
Higher scores indicate higher satisfaction.
Assesses the extent to which parents found the intervention helpful, relevant, feasible, and effective.
|
11 weeks
|
|
Parent-Patient Activation Measure - Mental Health
Time Frame: baseline
|
The Parent-Patient Activation Measure - Mental Health measures parent activation, defined as the knowledge, ability, and confidence to manage their child's mental health care.
It consists of 13 items on a 4-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1-4.
Item scores are summed for a total composite score ranging from 13 -52.
Composite scores are linearly transformed into scores ranging from 0 - 100.
Higher scores indicate higher activation in managing their child's mental health care.
|
baseline
|
|
Parent-Patient Activation Measure - Mental Health
Time Frame: 11 weeks
|
The Parent-Patient Activation Measure - Mental Health measures parent activation, defined as the knowledge, ability, and confidence to manage their child's mental health care.
It consists of 13 items on a 4-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1-4.
Item scores are summed for a total composite score ranging from 13 -52.
Composite scores are linearly transformed into scores ranging from 0 - 100.
Higher scores indicate higher activation in managing their child's mental health care.
|
11 weeks
|
|
Family Empowerment Scale
Time Frame: baseline
|
The Family Empowerment Scale consists of 34-items and 3 subscales (1.
Family, 2. Mental health services, 3. Community) designed to assess a parent's sense of empowerment in families of children with an emotional disorder.
Response options range from 1 (not true at all) - 5 (very true).
Total scores range from 34 - 170, with higher scores indicating higher levels of empowerment.
|
baseline
|
|
Family Empowerment Scale
Time Frame: 11 weeks
|
The Family Empowerment Scale consists of 34-items and 3 subscales (1.
Family, 2. Mental health services, 3. Community) designed to assess a parent's sense of empowerment in families of children with an emotional disorder.
Response options range from 1 (not true at all) - 5 (very true).
Total scores range from 34 - 170, with higher scores indicating higher levels of empowerment.
|
11 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
PROMIS Parent-Proxy Pediatric Anxiety Short Form 8a (PROMIS Anxiety)
Time Frame: baseline
|
The PROMIS Parent-Proxy Pediatric Anxiety Short Form 8a is an 8-item measure that assesses symptoms of fear, anxious misery, hyperarousal, and somatic symptoms related to arousal among pediatric populations aged 5- to 17-years old.
It is a parent report with response options that range from 1 (never) to 5 (almost always).
Total scores range from 8 -40 with higher scores indicating higher levels of anxiety.
|
baseline
|
|
PROMIS Parent-Proxy Pediatric Anxiety Short Form 8a (PROMIS Anxiety)
Time Frame: 11 weeks
|
The PROMIS Parent-Proxy Pediatric Anxiety Short Form 8a is an 8-item measure that assesses symptoms of fear, anxious misery, hyperarousal, and somatic symptoms related to arousal among pediatric populations aged 5- to 17-years old.
It is a parent report with response options that range from 1 (never) to 5 (almost always).
Total scores range from 8 -40 with higher scores indicating higher levels of anxiety.
|
11 weeks
|
|
PROMIS Parent-Proxy Pediatric Depressive Symptoms Short Form 8a (PROMIS Depressive)
Time Frame: baseline
|
The PROMIS Parent-Proxy Pediatric Depressive Symptoms Short Form 8a is an 8-item measures that assesses negative mood and views of self, social cognition, and decreased positive affect and engagement among pediatric populations aged 5- to 17-years old.
It is a parent-report and response options range from 1 (never) to 5 (almost always).
Total scores range from 8 - 40 with higher scores indicating higher levels of depressive symptomatology.
|
baseline
|
|
PROMIS Parent-Proxy Pediatric Depressive Symptoms Short Form 8a (PROMIS Depressive)
Time Frame: 11 weeks
|
The PROMIS Parent-Proxy Pediatric Depressive Symptoms Short Form 8a is an 8-item measures that assesses negative mood and views of self, social cognition, and decreased positive affect and engagement among pediatric populations aged 5- to 17-years old.
It is a parent-report and response options range from 1 (never) to 5 (almost always).
Total scores range from 8 - 40 with higher scores indicating higher levels of depressive symptomatology.
|
11 weeks
|
|
Pediatric Symptom Checklist - 17 (PSC-17)
Time Frame: baseline
|
The Pediatric Symptom Checklist - 17 (PSC-17) is a 17-item measures that assesses child psychosocial function associated with internalizing, externalizing, and attention problems in children aged 5- to 17-years old.
The parent report version will be used.
Response options range from 0 (Never) - 2 (Often).
Total scores range from 0 - 51; Scores on the Internalizing subscale range from 0 - 15, Scores on the Attention subscale range from 0 - 15, Scores on the Externalizing subscale range from 0 - 35.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of symptomatology.
|
baseline
|
|
Pediatric Symptom Checklist - 17 (PSC-17)
Time Frame: 11 weeks
|
The Pediatric Symptom Checklist - 17 (PSC-17) is a 17-item measures that assesses child psychosocial function associated with internalizing, externalizing, and attention problems in children aged 5- to 17-years old.
The parent report version will be used.
Response options range from 0 (Never) - 2 (Often).
Total scores range from 0 - 51; Scores on the Internalizing subscale range from 0 - 15, Scores on the Attention subscale range from 0 - 15, Scores on the Externalizing subscale range from 0 - 35.
Higher scores indicate higher levels of symptomatology.
|
11 weeks
|
|
Barriers to Treatment Participation Scale; subscales I - IV
Time Frame: baseline
|
The Barriers to Treatment Participation Scale consists of 44 items and 4 subscales.
The subscales include: I. Stressors (20 items; Response options 1 (never a problem) -5 (very often a problem)); II.
Tx Demands (10 items; Response options 1-5); III Relevance (8 items; Response options: 1-5); IV Relationship (6 items; 1 -5); Total scores for the subscales with continuous response options range from 44- 220, With higher scores indicating higher barriers to treatment participation.
|
baseline
|
|
Barriers to Treatment Participation Scale; subscale V
Time Frame: baseline
|
The Barriers to Treatment Participation Scale consists of a fifth subscale, Critical Events (14 items; scored yes/no). Measures the extent to which the parent experienced barriers to their child participating in treatment, and specific types of barriers to treatment. |
baseline
|
|
Barriers to Treatment Participation Scale; subscales I - IV
Time Frame: 11 weeks
|
The Barriers to Treatment Participation Scale consists of 44 items and 4 subscales.
The subscales include: I. Stressors (20 items; Response options 1 (never a problem) -5 (very often a problem)); II.
Tx Demands (10 items; Response options 1-5); III Relevance (8 items; Response Options: 1-5); IV Relationship (6 items; 1 -5); Total scores for the subscales with continuous response options range from 44- 220, With higher scores indicating higher barriers to treatment participation.
|
11 weeks
|
|
Barriers to Treatment Participation Scale; subscale V
Time Frame: 11 weeks
|
The Barriers to Treatment Participation Scale consists of a fifth subscale, Critical Events (14 items; scored yes/no). Measures the extent to which the parent experienced barriers to their child participating in treatment, and specific types of barriers to treatment. |
11 weeks
|
|
Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS)
Time Frame: baseline
|
Measures four aspects of parental emotion regulation: (a) awareness and understanding of emotions; (b) acceptance of emotions; (c) the ability to control impulses and behave in accordance with goals in the presence of negative affect; and (d) access to emotion.
|
baseline
|
|
Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS)
Time Frame: 11 weeks
|
Measures four aspects of parental emotion regulation: (a) awareness and understanding of emotions; (b) acceptance of emotions; (c) the ability to control impulses and behave in accordance with goals in the presence of negative affect; and (d) access to emotion.
|
11 weeks
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Post-Session Items
Time Frame: 1 week
|
There are 9 post-session items for participants and 2 post-session items for parent coaches.
The post session items for participants include a mixture of likert-type items and open-ended responses to assess aspects of Acceptability, Usefulness, and Feasibility of each session.
There are no total scores given.
The investigators will use the information to refine the curriculum.
The parent coach items assess parent coach perceptions of ability to adhere to the session plan and asking if they have any suggestions to improve the session.
|
1 week
|
|
Post-Session Items
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
There are 9 post-session items for participants and 2 post-session items for parent coaches.
The post session items for participants include a mixture of likert-type items and open-ended responses to assess aspects of Acceptability, Usefulness, and Feasibility of each session.
There are no total scores given.
The investigators will use the information to refine the curriculum.
The parent coach items assess parent coach perceptions of ability to adhere to the session plan and asking if they have any suggestions to improve the session.
|
2 weeks
|
|
Post-Session Items
Time Frame: 3 weeks
|
There are 9 post-session items for participants and 2 post-session items for parent coaches.
The post session items for participants include a mixture of likert-type items and open-ended responses to assess aspects of Acceptability, Usefulness, and Feasibility of each session.
There are no total scores given.
The investigators will use the information to refine the curriculum.
The parent coach items assess parent coach perceptions of ability to adhere to the session plan and asking if they have any suggestions to improve the session.
|
3 weeks
|
|
Post-Session Items
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
There are 9 post-session items for participants and 2 post-session items for parent coaches.
The post session items for participants include a mixture of likert-type items and open-ended responses to assess aspects of Acceptability, Usefulness, and Feasibility of each session.
There are no total scores given.
The investigators will use the information to refine the curriculum.
The parent coach items assess parent coach perceptions of ability to adhere to the session plan and asking if they have any suggestions to improve the session.
|
4 weeks
|
|
Post-Session Items
Time Frame: 5 weeks
|
There are 9 post-session items for participants and 2 post-session items for parent coaches.
The post session items for participants include a mixture of likert-type items and open-ended responses to assess aspects of Acceptability, Usefulness, and Feasibility of each session.
There are no total scores given.
The investigators will use the information to refine the curriculum.
The parent coach items assess parent coach perceptions of ability to adhere to the session plan and asking if they have any suggestions to improve the session.
|
5 weeks
|
|
Post-Session Items
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
There are 9 post-session items for participants and 2 post-session items for parent coaches.
The post session items for participants include a mixture of likert-type items and open-ended responses to assess aspects of Acceptability, Usefulness, and Feasibility of each session.
There are no total scores given.
The investigators will use the information to refine the curriculum.
The parent coach items assess parent coach perceptions of ability to adhere to the session plan and asking if they have any suggestions to improve the session.
|
6 weeks
|
|
Post-Session Items
Time Frame: 7 weeks
|
There are 9 post-session items for participants and 2 post-session items for parent coaches.
The post session items for participants include a mixture of likert-type items and open-ended responses to assess aspects of Acceptability, Usefulness, and Feasibility of each session.
There are no total scores given.
The investigators will use the information to refine the curriculum.
The parent coach items assess parent coach perceptions of ability to adhere to the session plan and asking if they have any suggestions to improve the session.
|
7 weeks
|
|
Post-Session Items
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
There are 9 post-session items for participants and 2 post-session items for parent coaches.
The post session items for participants include a mixture of likert-type items and open-ended responses to assess aspects of Acceptability, Usefulness, and Feasibility of each session.
There are no total scores given.
The investigators will use the information to refine the curriculum.
The parent coach items assess parent coach perceptions of ability to adhere to the session plan and asking if they have any suggestions to improve the session.
|
8 weeks
|
|
Post-Session Items
Time Frame: 9 weeks
|
There are 9 post-session items for participants and 2 post-session items for parent coaches.
The post session items for participants include a mixture of likert-type items and open-ended responses to assess aspects of Acceptability, Usefulness, and Feasibility of each session.
There are no total scores given.
The investigators will use the information to refine the curriculum.
The parent coach items assess parent coach perceptions of ability to adhere to the session plan and asking if they have any suggestions to improve the session.
|
9 weeks
|
|
Post-Session Items
Time Frame: 10 weeks
|
There are 9 post-session items for participants and 2 post-session items for parent coaches.
The post session items for participants include a mixture of likert-type items and open-ended responses to assess aspects of Acceptability, Usefulness, and Feasibility of each session.
There are no total scores given.
The investigators will use the information to refine the curriculum.
The parent coach items assess parent coach perceptions of ability to adhere to the session plan and asking if they have any suggestions to improve the session.
|
10 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Heather J Risser, PhD, Northwestern University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- STU00214486
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.