- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04988737
Usability of a Perioperative Medication-Related Clinical Decision Support Application
November 20, 2025 updated by: Karen C. Nanji,M.D.,M.P.H., Massachusetts General Hospital
Usability of a Perioperative Medication-Related Clinical Decision Support Application: A Randomized Controlled Trial
The goal of this study is to compare the usability of a novel, medication-related clinical decision support (CDS) application to the current standard medication administration and documentation workflow.
The study will occur in a simulation setting, using a manikin and test patient data - no actual patients will participate.
Forty clinician participants will be randomly assigned to either the CDS group (who will complete simulation tasks using the CDS prototype) or the Control group (who will complete simulation tasks using the standard medication administration workflow).
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
40
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
- Massachusetts General Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Anesthesia Clinicians including attending anesthesiologists, Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs), and house staff (residents and fellows)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Study Staff
- Medical Students
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: CDS Group
Clinicians complete tasks using the CDS prototype.
Briefly, the clinician scans the barcode on the syringe label immediately prior to medication administration.
The scan triggers the CDS to display a dosing window with pertinent patient-specific information and/or alert(s) when necessary to prevent a medication error (ME) prior to the medication being administered.
Medication data are then sent from the CDS application to the patient's anesthesia record for automatic documentation in real-time, eliminating the need to manually document the medication in the Anesthesia Information Management System (AIMS).
When necessary, the CDS application generates alerts to prevent medication errors.
Upon receiving an alert, the anesthesia clinician may accept the alert and revise the action that generated the alert, or override the alert and continue with the planned action.
|
Robust, real-time medication-related clinical decision support application for use in the operating room.
The application is fully integrated with existing clinical systems.
It provides visual alerts for medication errors and adverse medication events at the point-of-care.
|
|
No Intervention: Control Group
Clinicians complete tasks using the conventional medication administration and documentation workflow in anesthesia.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Total time to complete 7 simulations tasks.
Time Frame: Measured from task start time to task end time, a cumulative average of 15 minutes
|
Total time (in seconds) to complete 7 simulations tasks.
|
Measured from task start time to task end time, a cumulative average of 15 minutes
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Total number of mouse clicks in 7 simulations tasks.
Time Frame: Measured from task start time to task end time, a cumulative average of 15 minutes
|
Total count of mouse clicks during all 7 simulations tasks.
|
Measured from task start time to task end time, a cumulative average of 15 minutes
|
|
Total distance traveled on the screen in pixels for 7 simulation tasks.
Time Frame: Measured from task start time to task end time, a cumulative average of 15 minutes
|
Total distance traveled on the screen in pixels during all 7 simulation tasks.
|
Measured from task start time to task end time, a cumulative average of 15 minutes
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
System Usability Scale (SUS) score.
Time Frame: Measured at the conclusion of study participation, an average of 15 minutes after the participant's start time
|
SUS is designed and validated only for first-time system users, so it will be completed by the CDS group only.
SUS scores range from 0 to 100 (higher score indicates higher usability).
The scores are not percentiles, but are interpreted using benchmark comparisons to industry standards.
|
Measured at the conclusion of study participation, an average of 15 minutes after the participant's start time
|
|
Number of usability issues.
Time Frame: Identified continuously over the duration of study participation, a cumulative average of 15 mins
|
Usability issues are defined as aspects of the system that prevent the user from accomplishing their goals with effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction.
Usability issues will be identified for the CDS group only.
Usability issues will be identified by a usability expert.
|
Identified continuously over the duration of study participation, a cumulative average of 15 mins
|
|
Single Ease Question score for each simulation task.
Time Frame: Measured at the end of each of the 7 tasks (each task requires an average of 3 minutes to complete)
|
"Overall, how difficult or easy did you find this task?"
Answers will be recorded on a 7-point Likert scale (1= "very difficult"; 7= "very easy").
|
Measured at the end of each of the 7 tasks (each task requires an average of 3 minutes to complete)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Karen C Nanji, MD, MPH, Massachusetts General Hospital
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 27, 2021
Primary Completion (Actual)
February 10, 2021
Study Completion (Actual)
February 10, 2021
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 9, 2021
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 26, 2021
First Posted (Actual)
August 3, 2021
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
November 25, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 20, 2025
Last Verified
July 1, 2021
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2020P000210
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Perioperative Medication Errors
-
Karen C. Nanji,M.D.,M.P.H.Not yet recruitingPerioperative Medication Errors | Perioperative Adverse Medication Events
-
Karen C. Nanji,M.D.,M.P.H.University of California, San Francisco; University of Toronto; University of... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingPerioperative Medication Safety
-
NYU Langone HealthRobert Wood Johnson Foundation; New York City Health and Hospitals CorporationCompletedMedication Adherence | Medication ErrorsUnited States
-
Western Michigan University School of MedicineUniversity of Michigan; Western Michigan UniversityActive, not recruitingMedication Errors | Pediatric Medication ErrorUnited States
-
NYU Langone HealthEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityAgency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)CompletedMedication ErrorsUnited States
-
University of VermontHealth Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)Completed
-
Malmö UniversityLund University; Region SkaneCompleted
-
University of NottinghamNational Institute for Health Research, United KingdomUnknown
-
Weill Medical College of Cornell UniversityCompleted
Clinical Trials on Electronic Clinical Decision Support Application
-
Wuerzburg University HospitalCharite University, Berlin, Germany; Goethe University; RWTH Aachen University; Technical University of Munich and other collaboratorsCompletedSurgery | ASA Class III/IV Patients | Clinical Decision Support SystemsGermany
-
Brittany LapinLearning Health Systems Rehabilitation Research NetworkActive, not recruitingPhysical Therapy EvaluationUnited States
-
Karen C. Nanji,M.D.,M.P.H.Not yet recruitingPerioperative Medication Errors | Perioperative Adverse Medication Events
-
South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation TrustActive, not recruitingStroke | Atrial FibrillationUnited Kingdom
-
Kaiser PermanenteCompletedPulmonary EmbolismUnited States
-
Lynette GohNational University Health System, Singapore; National University of SingaporeRecruitingPre Diabetes | Diabetes (DM)Singapore
-
Seattle Children's HospitalCompleted
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalHarvard Vanguard Medical AssociatesCompletedChronic Kidney DiseaseUnited States
-
Kenya Medical Research InstituteUnknown
-
University of California, San DiegoUniversity of California, Los Angeles; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; RAND; Agency... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingUrinary IncontinenceUnited States