Usability of a Perioperative Medication-Related Clinical Decision Support Application

November 20, 2025 updated by: Karen C. Nanji,M.D.,M.P.H., Massachusetts General Hospital

Usability of a Perioperative Medication-Related Clinical Decision Support Application: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The goal of this study is to compare the usability of a novel, medication-related clinical decision support (CDS) application to the current standard medication administration and documentation workflow. The study will occur in a simulation setting, using a manikin and test patient data - no actual patients will participate. Forty clinician participants will be randomly assigned to either the CDS group (who will complete simulation tasks using the CDS prototype) or the Control group (who will complete simulation tasks using the standard medication administration workflow).

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Anesthesia Clinicians including attending anesthesiologists, Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs), and house staff (residents and fellows)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Study Staff
  • Medical Students

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CDS Group
Clinicians complete tasks using the CDS prototype. Briefly, the clinician scans the barcode on the syringe label immediately prior to medication administration. The scan triggers the CDS to display a dosing window with pertinent patient-specific information and/or alert(s) when necessary to prevent a medication error (ME) prior to the medication being administered. Medication data are then sent from the CDS application to the patient's anesthesia record for automatic documentation in real-time, eliminating the need to manually document the medication in the Anesthesia Information Management System (AIMS). When necessary, the CDS application generates alerts to prevent medication errors. Upon receiving an alert, the anesthesia clinician may accept the alert and revise the action that generated the alert, or override the alert and continue with the planned action.
Robust, real-time medication-related clinical decision support application for use in the operating room. The application is fully integrated with existing clinical systems. It provides visual alerts for medication errors and adverse medication events at the point-of-care.
No Intervention: Control Group
Clinicians complete tasks using the conventional medication administration and documentation workflow in anesthesia.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total time to complete 7 simulations tasks.
Time Frame: Measured from task start time to task end time, a cumulative average of 15 minutes
Total time (in seconds) to complete 7 simulations tasks.
Measured from task start time to task end time, a cumulative average of 15 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total number of mouse clicks in 7 simulations tasks.
Time Frame: Measured from task start time to task end time, a cumulative average of 15 minutes
Total count of mouse clicks during all 7 simulations tasks.
Measured from task start time to task end time, a cumulative average of 15 minutes
Total distance traveled on the screen in pixels for 7 simulation tasks.
Time Frame: Measured from task start time to task end time, a cumulative average of 15 minutes
Total distance traveled on the screen in pixels during all 7 simulation tasks.
Measured from task start time to task end time, a cumulative average of 15 minutes

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
System Usability Scale (SUS) score.
Time Frame: Measured at the conclusion of study participation, an average of 15 minutes after the participant's start time
SUS is designed and validated only for first-time system users, so it will be completed by the CDS group only. SUS scores range from 0 to 100 (higher score indicates higher usability). The scores are not percentiles, but are interpreted using benchmark comparisons to industry standards.
Measured at the conclusion of study participation, an average of 15 minutes after the participant's start time
Number of usability issues.
Time Frame: Identified continuously over the duration of study participation, a cumulative average of 15 mins
Usability issues are defined as aspects of the system that prevent the user from accomplishing their goals with effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction. Usability issues will be identified for the CDS group only. Usability issues will be identified by a usability expert.
Identified continuously over the duration of study participation, a cumulative average of 15 mins
Single Ease Question score for each simulation task.
Time Frame: Measured at the end of each of the 7 tasks (each task requires an average of 3 minutes to complete)
"Overall, how difficult or easy did you find this task?" Answers will be recorded on a 7-point Likert scale (1= "very difficult"; 7= "very easy").
Measured at the end of each of the 7 tasks (each task requires an average of 3 minutes to complete)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Karen C Nanji, MD, MPH, Massachusetts General Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 27, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 10, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

February 10, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 3, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2020P000210

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Perioperative Medication Errors

Clinical Trials on Electronic Clinical Decision Support Application

Subscribe