Evaluation of Use of Clinical Decision Support System in HIV Care in Resource Constrained Settings (CDSS)

July 5, 2012 updated by: Tom Oluoch, Kenya Medical Research Institute

Evaluation of Use of Clinical Decision Support System for Early Detection of Immunological Treatment Failure Among HIV Patients in Resource Constrained Settings

The purpose of this study is to determine whether the use of a Computerized Decision Support System (CDSS) in form of alerts to clinicians enhances early detection of immunological treatment failure in HIV patients.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

We hypothesize that there is no difference in the time to detecting immunological treatment failure among HIV patients in resource poor settings whether the clinicians use an Electronic Medical Record (EMR) system with a Computerized Decision Support (CDSS) or an EMR without a CDSS. In this study, 20 clinics were assigned to the intervention (EMR+CDSS) arm and non-intervention arm (EMR only) and will be followed up for 12 months to assess whether there are any differences in time taken to detect immunological treatment failure based on CD4 cell count.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1460

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Nyanza
      • Kisumu, Nyanza, Kenya
        • KEMRI/CDC Clinical Research Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All HIV patients enrolled in participating clinics

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
NO_INTERVENTION: EMR Only
Clinics in this arm of the study will have a standard Electronic Medical Record (EMR) system installed - without a computerized decision support system.
Clinics in this arm of the study will have a standard Electronic Medical Record (EMR) system installed - without a computerized decision support system.
EXPERIMENTAL: EMR+CDSS
Clinics in this arm of the study will have an Electronic Medical Record (EMR) system with Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) enhancement implemented as alerts to aid the clinician in decision making.
Clinics in this arm of the study will have an Electronic Medical Record (EMR) system with Clinical Decision Support System (CDSS) enhancement implemented as alerts to aid the clinician in decision making.
Other Names:
  • Clinical Decision Support Systems
  • Electronic Medical Records

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The main end-point of the study will be the proportion of patients on treatment who have experienced treatment failure and appropriate clinical action taken according to the guidelines.
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Other outcome measures will be the proportion of CD4 cell counts done on time and proportion of pre-ART patient eligible for treatment that are initiated within 30 days of eligibility. The median time taken to clinical action will be measured.
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tom Oluoch, MSc, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Principal Investigator: Daniel Kwaro, MD, KEMRI-CDC

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 1, 2013

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 3, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 5, 2012

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 6, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

July 6, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 5, 2012

Last Verified

July 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV

Clinical Trials on EMR Only

Subscribe