Comparison of Dry-lab Laparoscopic Training and Robotic Virtual Simulator

May 15, 2024 updated by: Pouya Iranmanesh, University Hospital, Geneva

Comparison of Dry-lab Laparoscopic Training and Robotic Virtual Simulator Training to Develop Basic Laparoscopic Skills: A Randomized Clinical Trial

The objective of the present study is to compare the effectiveness of dry-lab laparoscopic training and robotic simulator training among medical students without any prior laparoscopic experience.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study will be a randomized clinical trial conducted at the Swiss Foundation For Innovation And Training In Surgery (SFITS), which is part of the Geneva University Hospital in Switzerland. Recruitment of a sample of 100 medical students with no prior experience in laparoscopic surgery will be performed. The participants will be randomized in 2 groups (50 participants in each group). The study group will undergo a single session of training using a standard, dry-lab laparoscopic box. The control group will undergo a single session of training using the da Vinci Skills Simulator. Post-training surgical skills for both groups will be measured using exercises from the FLS manual skills assessment. The overall performance on the FLS test will be compared between the two groups .

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Geneva, Switzerland, 1211
        • Recruiting
        • Geneva University Hospitals
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Pouya Iranmanesh, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Medical student at the University of Geneva

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous laparoscopic experience
  • Stereoblindness

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Da Vinci Simulator
Participants will undergo a single session of training using the da Vinci Simulator
Single training session
Active Comparator: Laparascopic training box
Participants will undergo a single session of training using a laparoscopic training box
Single training session

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
FLS score post-training session
Time Frame: Up to 1 hour after the beginning of the exam session.
This score is a composite outcome combining the time needed to finish the exercises and the proficiency in performing them (number of dropped objects, lack of movements precision, exercises rules violations, etc.). The score will go from 0 (worst score) to 800 (best score), with a passing score of 356.
Up to 1 hour after the beginning of the exam session.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Times needed to perform training exercises
Time Frame: Up to 1 hour after the beginning of the training session
Time required to perform the training exercises will be measured in both groups (dry-lab laparoscopic box and da Vinci skills simulator)
Up to 1 hour after the beginning of the training session

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pouya Iranmanesh, MD, University Hospital, Geneva

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 7, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 4, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • University of Geneva

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe