Skills to Enhance Positivity in Suicidal Youth (STEP)

October 11, 2025 updated by: Anthony Spirito, Brown University

Skills to Enhance Positivity in Adolescents at Risk for Suicide

This is a Hybrid Type I Effectiveness-Implementation design. Specifically, this study proposes to test the effectiveness of STEP in reducing suicidal events and ideation in 216 adolescents, admitted to inpatient psychiatric care due to suicide risk. Participants will be randomized to either STEP or ETAU. STEP involves 4 in-person sessions (3 individual, 1 family) focused on psychoeducation regarding positive and negative affect, mindfulness meditation, gratitude, and savoring. Mood monitoring prompts and skill reminders will be sent daily for the first month post-discharge and three times a week for the following two months. The ETAU condition will receive reminders to log into a safety resource app, matched in frequency to the STEP group. Effectiveness aspects of the design include using clinical staff as interventionists and having very few exclusion criteria.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

216 participants and their families (across two sites) will be randomized to either STEP or ETAU (as described in the research strategy). Aims and hypotheses are below:

Aim 1: Examine the effectiveness of STEP in reducing suicidal events (attempt or emergency intervention to intercede attempt), active SI (with intent or plan), and depression at 6-month f/u (primary) and suicidal events at 12-month follow-up (f/u). H1: It is hypothesized that those randomized to STEP, compared to ETAU, will have lower rates of suicide events (H1A), active SI (H1B), and depression (H1C) over the 6-month follow-up period; H1D: It is hypothesized that those randomized to STEP, compared to ETAU, will have lower rates of suicidal events at the 12-month, long term f/u.

Aim 2: Examine engagement of the hypothesized mechanisms at the 3- and 6-month f/u. It is hypothesized that those randomized to STEP, compared to ETAU, will have: H2A: higher attention to positive affect, assessed by implicit tasks; H2B: higher gratitude and satisfaction with life, assessed by self-report; H2C: lower negative affect, assessed by implicit tasks and self-report.

Aim 3: Examine whether hypothesized mechanisms mediate reduction of suicidal events and ideation. H3: Changes in attention to positive affect, gratitude, satisfaction with life, and negative affect at 3-month f/u will be related to improvements in suicidal ideation and suicidal events at the 6-month f/u.

Secondary Aim Examine elements supporting external validity. Acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of STEP to patients, parents, clinicians, and administrators will be assessed by: 1) a survey consisting of brief, standardized measures of these items, and 2) qualitative interviews to further explore these perceptions. These findings will be used to: 1) modify STEP to address potential barriers, and 2) develop implementation strategies designed to overcome these challenges, for testing in a future Hybrid Type III effectiveness-implementation trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

216

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Recruiting
        • Children's Hospital
        • Contact:
    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02906
      • Riverside, Rhode Island, United States, 02903

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years to 60 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria: Patients

  • Ages 12- 60 years
  • hospitalized on an inpatient psychiatric unit due to suicide risk
  • past month suicide attempts or suicidal ideation
  • proficient in English (parent either English or Spanish
  • access to a smart phone.

Inclusion Criteria: Stakeholders

Ages 22 - 60 years

  • work with adolescents hospitalized on an inpatient psychiatric unit due to suicide risk
  • proficient in English or Spanish

Exclusion Criteria:

  • active psychotic disorder
  • significant cognitive impairment or deficits
  • ward of the State
  • discharge to residential facility.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: STEP: Positivity skill enhancement
This intervention includes the Enhanced TAU described below plus it entails 4 in-person sessions delivered during an inpatient psychiatric admission, followed by mood monitoring and skills messages delivered post-discharge via app, to promote the practice of increasing attention to positive affect and experiences as a means of reducing risk for suicidal behavior.
Behavioral intervention to increase positive affect
Active Comparator: Enhanced TAU
his comparison intervention involves regular programming of the inpatient psychiatric unit, followed by safety plan and resources loaded onto an app that the participant has access to post-discharge.
Standard care plus a phone app with a personalized safety plan

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Suicidal events
Time Frame: baseline; change from baseline at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up
Composite variable of either a suicide attempt or emergency intervention to intercede when suicidal behavior may be imminent; Will be obtained from clinical interviews (C-SSRS; CASA) with the participant and parent(s).
baseline; change from baseline at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up
Suicidal ideation
Time Frame: baseline; change from baseline at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up
Suicide Ideation (SI) will be operationalized as proportion of participants with active SI as assessed by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale interview: 5 items on suicidal ideation rated yes or no
baseline; change from baseline at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up
Proportion of Weeks with Suicidal ideation
Time Frame: baseline; change from baseline at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up
The proportion of weeks during follow-up with active suicidal ideation as assessed by the Adolescent version of the Longitudinal Interview for Follow-Up Events (A-LIFE) scale (interview based assessment), with the participant.
baseline; change from baseline at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up
Depression
Time Frame: baseline; change from baseline at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up
Depressive symptom severity will be assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II). The BDI-II will be administered to the adolescent participant and their parent (reporting on the adolescent participant) with scores ranging from 0 to 63 with higher scores reflecting greater depression.
baseline; change from baseline at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Attention to positive affect
Time Frame: baseline; change from baseline at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up
Using eye tracking we will measure fixation and overall gaze duration during a dot probe task using emotional and neutral words to determine whether there is a change in attention to positive affect (participant only).
baseline; change from baseline at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up
Implicit positive and negative affect
Time Frame: baseline; change from baseline at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up
Implicit positive affect will be assessed using the Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test (IPANAT), which is an indirect assessment of automatic activation of affective representations that utilizes artificial words paired with positive and negative words (participant only).
baseline; change from baseline at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up
Explicit positive and negative affect
Time Frame: baseline; change from baseline at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up
Explicit positive affect will be assessed using the Modified Differential Emotions Scale (mDES) which is a 20 item short term self-report of positive and negative emotions administered to the participant only. There are 10 items in the positive affect and 10 items in the negative affect subscales with scores ranging from 0 to 30 for each subscale with higher scores reflecting higher affect.
baseline; change from baseline at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up
Gratitude
Time Frame: baseline; change from baseline at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up
Gratitude will be assessed with the 6 item Gratitude Scale, administered to the participant only. Scores range from 6 to 42 with higher scores indicating greater gratitude.
baseline; change from baseline at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up
Satisfaction with life scale
Time Frame: baseline; change from baseline at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up
5 self-report questions about participant satisfaction with life with scores ranging from 7 to 35 with higher scores indicating higher satisfaction with life.
baseline; change from baseline at 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 4, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 25, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 6, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

October 15, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1023

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

We will release demographics, primary and secondary data thru the NDA

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Final data set available within one year of completion

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

University-based researchers

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Suicide, Attempted

Clinical Trials on STEP

Subscribe