Cognitive Fatigue, Self-Regulation, and Academic Performance: A Physiological Study (FRAPS)

March 21, 2023 updated by: Georgios CHRISTOPOULOS, Nanyang Technological University
This study aims to examine the relationship among cognitive fatigue, self-regulation, and academic performance.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

1) Sievertsen et al. (2016) have demonstrated that standardised test performance decreased with every hour later in the day and increased after a break. Hence, we hypothesise that standardised test performance would vary as a function of physiological response during cognitive fatigue. 2) Martin et al. (2019) found that those who participate in more self-regulatory activity were less susceptible to the effects of cognitive fatigue. Hence, we hypothesise that greater self-regulation may moderate the relationship between cognitive fatigue and standardised test performance. Individual differences (i.e., age, gender, caffeine and food intake, body mass index, skin temperature, sleep quality, depression, anxiety, stress, baseline physiology and behavioural performance) will be examined and accounted for.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

162

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Singapore, Singapore, 639798
        • Recruiting
        • Cultural Science Innovations, Nanyang Technological University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 35 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Singapore-based
  • Non-clinical
  • 18-35years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals with hearing difficulties or failing to meet the minimal threshold for normal hearing
  • Individuals with a history of ear, developmental, neurological, or psychiatric disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental: Fatigue Manipulation
5-min urban park video clip (Presented on a TV)
20-min 2-back task (Presented on a computer)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
2-Back Task (Change)
Time Frame: during fatigue manipulation procedure
Change in Accuracy over time
during fatigue manipulation procedure
2-Back Task (Change)
Time Frame: during fatigue manipulation procedure
Change in Reaction Time over time
during fatigue manipulation procedure
Fatigue State Questionnaire
Time Frame: up to 5 mins after fatigue manipulation
Fatigue State Questionnaire Score
up to 5 mins after fatigue manipulation
Electrocardiograph (Change)
Time Frame: during fatigue manipulation procedure
Change in Heart Rate Variability over time
during fatigue manipulation procedure
Electrodermal Activity (Change)
Time Frame: during fatigue manipulation procedure
Change in Skin Conductance Level over time
during fatigue manipulation procedure
Electrodermal Activity (Change)
Time Frame: during fatigue manipulation procedure
Change in Skin Conductance Response over time
during fatigue manipulation procedure
Short Self-Regulation Questionnaire
Time Frame: up to 1 hour before fatigue manipulation
Short Self-Regulation Questionnaire Score
up to 1 hour before fatigue manipulation
Academic Performance
Time Frame: up to 1 hour before fatigue manipulation
Self-reported Academic Results
up to 1 hour before fatigue manipulation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 26, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 15, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 12, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 19, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 23, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • COT-V4-2020-1-S003

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mental Fatigue

Clinical Trials on Baseline

3
Subscribe