- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05017129
E-training of Inmate Peer Caregivers for Enhancing Geriatric and End-of-life Care in Prisons
July 17, 2025 updated by: Klein Buendel, Inc.
E-training of Inmate Peer Caregivers for Enhancing Geriatric and End-of-life Care in Prisons - Phase II
The demographics of the U.S. prison population are shifting at a dramatic rate requiring new approaches to prison healthcare.
Current estimates suggest that there are 2.3 million incarcerated persons in the U.S. Similar to the free world, the aging of the Baby Boom generation is occurring in prisons.
Notably, inmates 50 and older constitute over 20% of prisoners in state or federal facilities.
From 1996-2016, there was an 280% growth in the number of state and federal prisoners age 55 or older, which is in sharp contrast to younger inmates that grew by only 3% during this time period.
A surge in older adult offenders in the U.S. has not occurred but rather statutes now impose stiffer sentences, resulting in longer periods of incarceration, such as life without parole or 20+ years.
At the same time, early release policies remain restrictive.
As a result, sentenced offenders are living through middle and older adulthood within the confines of prisons.
Study Overview
Detailed Description
There are over 1,719 United States (US) state and federal prisons with over 2.3 million prisoners.
In 2017, more than 20% of sentenced prisoners were age 50 or older.
The health status of older inmates is often parallel with free-living people who are far older (e.g., 10-15 years).
Older prisoners disproportionately contribute to the steeply rising correctional healthcare costs and their death rate is 10 times that of younger prisoners.
Corrections budgets are stretched as they strive to meet the care needs of aged and dying prisoners.
Carefully selected and vetted inmates offer an abundant human resource that is poised to contribute in important ways to augment prison staff in meeting growing care needs of older and dying inmates.
However, the lack of standardized, evidence-based, training that is geared toward this target audience is a current barrier to ensuring high quality inmate caregiving.
In response to this need, our Phase I project E-training of Inmate Peer Caregivers for Enhancing Geriatric and End-of-Life Care in Prisons demonstrated that inmate access to technology is growing and inmates can be successful e-learners.
Specifically, we learned: (1) there is a need and interest for products such as our Inmates Care computer-based learning (CBL); (2) trainings should be engaging, interactive, and contextually sensitive to the specific environment, target user, and security constraints, while at the same time being mindful of emerging trends in regard to technology use by inmates (e.g., availability of tablets for purchase and use in many states); and finally, (3) that interactive, media-rich prototype modules with high acceptability and usability could be developed.
The specifications document and commercialization plan indicated it is possible to develop a full-scale Inmates Care learning system in Phase II and a Technology Niche Analyses® revealed market potential exists.
The purpose of this Phase II application is to continue research and development of the Inmates Care learning system with an emphasis on developing a scalable unit for commercialization and testing scale-up in a larger number of more diverse state prisons.
More specifically, the aims of this Phase II study are to: 1) Develop a full scale media-rich interactive computer-based learning system Inmates Care, that consists of six modules aimed at augmenting the highly variable face-to-face inmate caregiving programs in state prisons with standardized, evidence-based training to prepare inmates in assisting with end-of-life (EOL) and geriatric care; and one Training Overview and Rollout module that prepares staff to use Inmates Care as a tool for inmate peer caregiver training; 2) Conduct in-person usability testing of the full-scale Inmates Care program in two rounds in state prisons to evaluate logistics, inmate and staff impressions, user interface, ease of use, and perceived barriers in order to optimize the scalable unit for broader dissemination (n=30); and 3) Test scale-up of the full-scale Inmates Care program in state prisons across the nation to evaluate knowledge acquisition outcomes, usage patterns, and commercialization opportunities (n=288).
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
53
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Colorado
-
Golden, Colorado, United States, 80401
- Klein Buendel, Inc.
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
University Park, Pennsylvania, United States, 16802
- Pennsylvania State University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Inmate Peer Caregivers:
- providing geriatric and/or EOL care at participating state prison (Aims 1 and 2 only);
- age >18;
- able to speak and understand English; and
- able to consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Under the age of 18
- Unable to speak and understand English
Prison Staff:
Inclusion Criteria:
- age >18;
- able to speak and understand English;
- able to consent; and
- have been exposed to inmate peer caregiving (e.g., through training them, oversight of a peer caregiving program, or working with inmate peer caregivers in the infirmary, personal care, or hospice area of prisons)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Under the age of 18
- Unable to speak and understand English
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Inmates Care modules
This is a within-subjects, pre-post design with a single intervention.
The intervention is a 6 module computer-based learning program for training peer caregivers in end-of-life care.
|
The single intervention is a computer-based learning program.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Knowledge Acquisition
Time Frame: Pre-test (prior to online training- Total Score)
|
There are no existing measures to evaluate improvements in knowledge among inmates and staff for geriatric and EOL care of inmates.
Therefore, the primary outcome measure will be developed for this project.
Scale development and psychometric properties will be evaluated (e.g., content-validity, criterion-related validity, construct validity, and internal consistency) using: (1) domain identification and item generation; (2) content expert validation, and (3) pilot test.
|
Pre-test (prior to online training- Total Score)
|
|
Inmates Program Findings
Time Frame: Post-test (immediately following online training) approximately one hour
|
Evaluate improvements in knowledge among inmates
|
Post-test (immediately following online training) approximately one hour
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
System Usability Scale (SUS)
Time Frame: After small-scale usability testing and at post-test for the large-scale testing. Approximately two hours
|
The SUS is a validated tool for assessing the usability and acceptability of technological products.
|
After small-scale usability testing and at post-test for the large-scale testing. Approximately two hours
|
|
Qualitative questions
Time Frame: After small-scale usability testing and at post-test for the large-scale testing. Approximately two hours
|
Six brief open-end questions that ask how helpful the program was, how the liked program was, and whether the user has any suggested changes to the program.
|
After small-scale usability testing and at post-test for the large-scale testing. Approximately two hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Barbara Walkosz, PhD, Klein Buendel, Inc.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
June 15, 2020
Primary Completion (Actual)
December 19, 2024
Study Completion (Actual)
December 31, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 8, 2021
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 17, 2021
First Posted (Actual)
August 23, 2021
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
July 22, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 17, 2025
Last Verified
July 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 0327
- 5R44AG057239-03 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Aging
-
Florida Institute for Human and Machine CognitionNot yet recruitingAging | Healthy Aging | Aging WellUnited States
-
Tuba MadenCompletedAging | Aging Problems | Aging Disorder
-
University of CopenhagenRecruitingAging | Healthy Aging | Aging FrailtyDenmark
-
Radboud University Medical CenterTerminated
-
Northwestern UniversityPotocsnak Human Longevity LabRecruitingAging | Aging Well | Aging, Biological | Aging, HealthyUnited States
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NiceNot yet recruitingAging | Aging, HealthyFrance
-
University of Santiago de CompostelaEuropean Regional Development Fund; Center for Industrial Technological Development...Completed
-
TruDiagnosticBlushield USANot yet recruitingAging | Aging Well
-
Arizona State UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
San Diego State UniversityCompleted
Clinical Trials on Inmates Care
-
Tehran University of Medical SciencesBoston UniversityNot yet recruitingMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting | Vitamin D3 Deficiency | Adult ALL
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterMaastricht UniversityCompleted
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterRecruitingLung Cancer | Gastrointestinal CancerUnited States
-
KU LeuvenUniversitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenCompletedStroke | Frailty | Hip FracturesBelgium
-
Carlos III Health InstituteHealth Department of the Basque GovernmentCompleted
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedAdvanced Care PlanningUnited States
-
Kaiser PermanenteCompletedAttention-deficit HyperactivityUnited States
-
Vastra Gotaland RegionRecruiting
-
University of Lausanne HospitalsNational Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI); Swiss National Science FoundationCompletedPulmonary EmbolismSwitzerland, France, United States, Belgium
-
Vanderbilt UniversityCompletedMidwifery | Prenatal Care | Maternal Health Services | Perinatal Care | Maternal-child Health ServicesUnited States