The Safety and Efficacy of TLL-018 in Active Rheumatoid Arthritis

September 1, 2023 updated by: Hangzhou Highlightll Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd

A Phase 2A, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Tofacitinib-parallel-group Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of TLL-018 in Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Had an Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Methotrexate.

This is a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, tofacitinib-parallel-group, phase 2A study to assess the safety and efficacy of TLL-018 in active rheumatoid arthritis subject who had an inadequate response or intolerance to methotrexate.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

101

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100000
        • Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosed with RA based on either the 1987-revised American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria or the 2010 ACR/European League against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria and have an inadequate response or intolerance to methotrexate.
  2. Subjects must have been receiving oral or parenteral methotrexate therapy ≥ 3 months and on a stable prescription of 7.5 to 25 mg/week for at least 4 weeks prior to Baseline Visit.
  3. Have active RA as defined by the following minimum disease activity criteria:

    • ≥ 6 swollen joints (based on 66 joint counts) at Screening and Baseline Visits;
    • ≥ 6 tender joints (based on 68 joint counts) at Screening and Baseline Visits;
    • high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) > upper limit of normal (ULN) OR positive for both rheumatoid factor and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) at Screening.
  4. For subjects with inadequate response to methotrexate, subjects must have discontinued all oral disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) prior to Baseline Visit as specified below or for at least five times the mean terminal elimination half-life of a drug, whichever is longer:

    • ≥4 weeks prior to Baseline Visit for minocycline, penicillamine, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine, azathioprine, gold formulations, cyclophosphamide;
    • ≥12 weeks prior to Baseline Visit for leflunomide if no elimination procedure was followed, or adhere to a washout procedure (i.e., 11 days washout with colestyramine, or 30 days washout with activated charcoal).
  5. The organ function level must meet the following requirements:

Bone marrow: Blood routine results showed hemoglobin ≥90g/L, platelet ≥100×109/L, neutrophil absolute count ≥1.5×109/L; Liver: serum bilirubin ≤1.5 times the upper limit of normal value, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) ≤1.5 times the upper limit of normal value, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤1.5 times the upper limit of normal value; Serum creatinine <1.5 times the upper limit of normal value; Urine protein ≤1+, if urine protein >1+, urine protein should be collected for 24 hours, the total amount should be ≤1 g. Female subjects of childbearing potential must test negative for pregnancy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. History of Felty syndrome (Rheumatoid arthritis - Splenomegaly syndrome).
  2. A history of herpes zoster or disseminated herpes simplex.
  3. Treatment with any JAK inhibitor (tofacitinib, baricitinib, ruxolitinib) within 2 weeks prior to study start.
  4. Subjects have severe, progressive or uncontrollable symptoms of kidney, liver, blood, gastrointestinal, lung, cardiovascular, neurological or brain disease.
  5. Current treatment or treatment within 4 weeks or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to the first dose of study medication with another investigational medication or current enrollment in another investigational drug protocol.
  6. If the laboratory T-Spot test (or other TB diagnostic test) is positive, the investigator will determine the activity based on the history and clinical manifestations, and the patients diagnosed as active TB should be excluded.
  7. Positive blood screen for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), or hepatitis C antibody.
  8. Pregnant or breastfeeding female.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Sequence 1
TLL018 tablets, 1piece,BID
Oral tablets administered at dose1 BID daily for 24 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Sequence 1
Oral tablets administered at dose2 BID daily for 24 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Sequence 2
Oral tablets administered at dose3 BID daily for 24 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Sequence 3
Experimental: Sequence 2
TLL018 tablets, 2pieces, BID
Oral tablets administered at dose1 BID daily for 24 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Sequence 1
Oral tablets administered at dose2 BID daily for 24 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Sequence 2
Oral tablets administered at dose3 BID daily for 24 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Sequence 3
Experimental: Sequence 3
TLL018 tablets, 3pieces, BID
Oral tablets administered at dose1 BID daily for 24 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Sequence 1
Oral tablets administered at dose2 BID daily for 24 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Sequence 2
Oral tablets administered at dose3 BID daily for 24 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Sequence 3
Active Comparator: Sequence 4
TOFA tablets, 1pieces, BID
Oral tablets administered at 5 mg BID daily for 24 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Sequence 4

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12

A participant was a responder if the following 3 criteria for improvement from baseline were met:

  • ≥50% improvement in 68-tender joint count;
  • ≥50% improvement in 66-swollen joint count; and
  • ≥50% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following parameters:
Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response
Time Frame: Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
ACR20 response: greater than or equal to (>=) 20 percent (%) improvement in painful and tender joint count; >= 20% improvement in swollen joint count; and >= 20% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP)at each visit.
Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Number of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response
Time Frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
ACR50 response: greater than or equal to (>=) 50 percent (%) improvement in painful and tender joint count; >= 50% improvement in swollen joint count; and >= 50% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at each visit.
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Number of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response
Time Frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
ACR70 response: greater than or equal to (>=) 70 percent (%) improvement in painful and tender joint count; >= 70% improvement in swollen joint count; and >= 70% improvement in at least 3 of 5 remaining ACR core measures: participant assessment of pain; participant global assessment of disease activity; physician global assessment of disease activity; self-assessed disability (disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]); and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at each visit.
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count-High-Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (DAS28-hsCRP)
Time Frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Disease Activity Score (DAS) based on a 28 joint count hsCRP consisted of composite numerical score of following variables: tender joint count (TJC28), swollen joint count (SJC28), hsCRP (mg/mL), and participant's global assessment of disease activity. DAS28-hsCRP was calculated using following formula: DAS28-hsCRP equals to (=) 0.56*square root (sqrt) (TJC28) plus (+) 0.28*sqrt (SJC28) + 0.36*natural log(hsCRP+1) + 0.014*participant's global assessment of disease activity + 0.96. Scores ranged 0-9.4, where lower scores indicated less disease activity. Change = value at observation minus value at baseline.
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Change From Baseline in Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)
Time Frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
CDAI is calculated as the sum of tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity as assessed by Multi-dimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) subscore, and Investigator's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (VAS in cm). 28 joints are examined. The range for the CDAI is 0 - 76 with a negative change in CDAI score indicating an improvement in disease activity and a positive change in score indicating a worsening of disease activity.
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Changes From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Total Score
Time Frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
HAQ-DI score was an evaluation of the functional status for a participant. The 20-question instrument assessed the degree of difficulty a person had in accomplishing tasks in 8 functional areas (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping, and activities of daily living). Responses in each functional area were scored from 0, indicated no difficulty, to 3, indicated inability to perform a task in that area. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range: 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Percent Change From Baseline in Participant's Assessment of Pain Based on Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score
Time Frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
The participants were asked to assess their level of pain by marking a vertical tick on a 100 mm horizontal VAS scale. The scale ranged from 0-100 mm, where 0 indicated no pain and 100 indicated worst possible pain.
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Arthritis
Time Frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your arthritis affects you, how are you feeling today?" Participants responded by using a 0 - 100 mm Visual Analog Scale where 0 = very well and 100 = very poorly. Change = score at observation minus score at baseline.
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Arthritis
Time Frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity was measured on a 0 to 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), with 0 mm = no disease activity; very good and 100 mm = worst disease activity; very poor. Change = score at observation minus score at baseline.
Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 16, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 19, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

May 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 15, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

November 24, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 5, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 1, 2023

Last Verified

September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe