Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Versus Anticoagulation Monotherapy in Intermediate-High Risk PE (CANARY)

December 28, 2021 updated by: Parham Sadeghipour, Rajaie Cardiovascular Medical and Research Center

Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis Versus ANticoagulation Monotherapy in Patients With Acute Intermediate-High Risk PulmonarY Embolism: The CANARY Randomized Clinical Trial

In an open-label parallel groups blinded-endpoint randomized clinical trial, the investigators aim to assess the safety and efficacy of conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) vs anticoagulation monotherapy on outcomes of patients with acute intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism. The investigators hypothesize that CDT will have a superior efficacy and safety compared with anticoagulation-only therapy regarding the proportion of patients with a right ventricle to left ventricle (RV/LV) ratio > 0.9 at a 3-month follow-up by an imaging core laboratory, major bleeding, severe thrombocytopenia, or vascular access complication.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Treatment of intermediate risk PE is still debated. Despite the promising results of small studies on the efficacy and safety of systemic thrombolytic therapy, larger trials failed to show a net clinical benefit. Pulmonary EmbolIsmTHrOmbolysis (PEITHO) trial which compared the full-dose systemic thrombolysis (i.e., tenecteplase) versus anticoagulation therapy in patients with intermediate-risk PE showed significant lower incidence of mortality or hemodynamic collapse in the first 7 days after randomization in patients who received tenecteplase (2.6% vs 5.6% in placebo group, [odds ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.23 to 0.87; P value, 0.02]). However the mortality benefit was neutralized by the increased risk of major bleeding in thrombolytic arm (11.5% vs 2.4% in the tenecteplase and placebo group, respectively. Importantly, during the long-term follow up (median of 37.8 months) of PEITHO participants, the thrombolytic therapy failed to improve the RV right ventricular function, residual dyspnea ( 36% in thrombolysis group vs 30.1% in the placebo group), or mortality rates (20.3% in thrombolysis group vs 18 % in the placebo group ). CTEPH occurred in ( 2.1% in thrombolysis group vs 3.2% in the placebo group. The lack of benefit of full-dose thrombolytic in PEITHO, might have several explanations. Intermediate risk PE compose of heterogenous group of patients with different prognosis in whom one fits all approach would not be applicable. This heterogeneity in prognosis were underlined in the latest guideline of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) which classified the intermediate-risk PE category into two groups of intermediate-low and intermediate-high risk patients according to the right ventricle function and cardiac biomarker levels. Second, lower-dose thrombolytic regimen might result in the same benefit with lower bleeding events. CDT, by delivering drug locally, claims to increase the efficacy of thrombolytic agents and consequently decrease the required dose which might translate to lower bleeding events.

In an open-label parallel groups blinded-endpoint randomized clinical trial, we aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of standard catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) vs anticoagulation-only therapy in patients with acute intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism. The hypothesis is that CDT will have a superior efficacy and safety regarding the proportion of patients with a RV/LV ratio > 0.9 at a 3-month follow-up assessed by an imaging core laboratory with the lower complications of major bleeding, severe thrombocytopenia, and vascular access complication.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

94

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients ≥18 years
  2. Confirmed acute pulmonary emboli by computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA)
  3. Symptom onset ≤14 day
  4. Elevated N-terminal-proB-type natriuretic peptide and cardiac troponin
  5. Right ventricle/left ventricle ratio >0.9 in transthoracic echocardiography
  6. Less than 48 hours of anticoagulation therapy
  7. Willingness for participation in the study with signed and dated informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pulmonary emboli detected by modalities other than CTPA
  2. Segmental PE
  3. High risk (massive)
  4. Severe renal dysfunction(creatinine clearance [CrCl] below 30 mL/min)
  5. Terminal illness Surgery within 2 weeks
  6. Platelet count <50.000 /µL
  7. Pre and post catheter directed thrombolysis echocardiography exam not possible
  8. Contraindication to thrombolytic therapy
  9. Concomitant right heart thrombi
  10. Allergic reaction to study medications
  11. Lack or withdrawal of informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT)
Conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) will be the interventional arm. CDT will be administered using fixed-dose of 24 mg tissue plasminogen activator infusion over 24 hours (0.5 mg/h per catheter if bilateral or 1 mg/h per unilateral catheter) with 500 unit per hour of infusion of unfractionated heparin during the thrombolytic therapy. The therapeutic dose of heparin will immediately be substituted the CDT after termination, and twice-daily subcutaneous enoxaparin (1mg/kg) for the first 48 hours after the thrombolytic therapy will be administered. Direct oral anticoagulation will be in ones with no clinical deterioration.
Conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis with fixed-dose of 24 mg tissue plasminogen activator infusion over 24 hours
Other Names:
  • Cragg-McNamara™ valved infusion catheters
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Anticoagulation-only therapy
The anticoagulation-only therapy will be the assigned treatment in the control arm. Control patients will receive subcutaneous enoxaparin (twice-daily, 1mg/kg) in the first 48hours of enrollment. Direct oral anticoagulation will be in ones with no clinical deterioration.
Subcutaneous enoxaparin twice-daily (1mg/kg)
Other Names:
  • low molecular weight heparin (LMWH)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The proportion of patients with a RV/LV ratio >0.9
Time Frame: At 3 months from randomization
Proportion of patients with a RV/LV ratio >0.9 at a assessed by an imaging core laboratory 3-month follow-up
At 3 months from randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The proportion of patients with an RV/LV ratio >0.9
Time Frame: At 72 hours from randomization
A composite of the proportion of patients with a RV/LV ratio >0.9 at a assessed by an imaging core laboratory 72 hours follow-up
At 72 hours from randomization
The proportion of patients with Unrecovered RV
Time Frame: At 3 months from randomization
The PEITHO definition for RV recovery was employed, as follows: 1) RV size (at the mid-cavity level In apical 4-chamber view) <35 mm, 2) pulmonary artery pressure <35 mm Hg, 3) an RV/LV ratio <0.9, and 4) the normalization of RV free wall motion. The fulfillment of all the criteria, some criteria, and none of the criteria was defined as complete, partial, and no recovery, respectively.
At 3 months from randomization
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: Within 3-month Study period
Survival status of the patient (being alive or dead) at the end of 3 months follow up
Within 3-month Study period
Major bleeding
Time Frame: Within 3-month Study period
According to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC 3 or 5 bleeding)
Within 3-month Study period
Severe thrombocytopenia
Time Frame: Within 3-month Study period
Platelet count <20.000/µL
Within 3-month Study period
Vascular access complication
Time Frame: Within 3-month Study period
Major vascular access complication
Within 3-month Study period

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
A composite of all-cause death or the primary outcome
Time Frame: Within 3-month Study period
Composite patients who died or patients with a RV/LV ratio >0.9 at a assessed by an imaging core laboratory 3-month follow-up
Within 3-month Study period
PE-related mortality.
Time Frame: Within 3-month Study period
Autopsy-confirmed PE with no more likely cause of death or objectively confirmed PE before death in the absence of another more likely cause of death
Within 3-month Study period
Hospital length of stay
Time Frame: Within 3-month Study period
The total days of the initial hospitalization
Within 3-month Study period
Six-minute walk test (6MWt) at three-month follow up
Time Frame: Within 3-month Study period
The functional capacity of the patient
Within 3-month Study period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

December 22, 2018

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

February 2, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 2, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 10, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 28, 2021

First Posted (ACTUAL)

December 29, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 29, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 28, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Data will become available to interested investigators upon submitting a reasonable research request, approved by the Steering Committee of the trial.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Embolism

Clinical Trials on Conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA)

Subscribe