Comparison of IntraArticular Platelet-Rich-Plasma to Corticosteroid Injections for Patients With Zygapophyseal Joint (Z-Joint) Low Back Pain Confirmed by Dual Intra-Articular Local Anesthetic Injections

Comparison of IntraArticular Platelet-Rich-Plasma to Corticosteroid Injections for Patients With Zygapophyseal Joint (Z-Joint) Low Back Pain Confirmed by Dual Intra-Articular Local Anesthetic Injections: A Triple Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of IntraArticular Platelet-Rich-Plasma to Corticosteroid Injections for Patients with Zygapophyseal Joint (Z-Joint) Low Back Pain Confirmed by Dual Intra-Articular Local Anesthetic Injections: A Triple Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Abstract/Project Summary Background: Zygapophyseal joint (Z-joint) pain represents up to 40% of lower back pain (LBP), a very common and disabling health issue. There are currently two treatment options for patients with Z-joint LBP unresponsive to conservative treatment: corticosteroid (CS) injections and radiofrequency ablation. CS injection is a shorter, less invasive and readily available procedure. Despite its accepted use, it has not shown its efficacy over placebo.

The use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been investigated for LBP treatment. PRP injection has the same advantages as CS and recent studies suggest that PRP injections are more effective than cortisone from two to six months post treatment. However, no blinded controlled trials have compared these two treatments, and no data is available on the efficacy of PRP after six months for LBP treatment.

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to compare the effect of intra-articular leucocyte poor (LP) PRP to CS injections on pain, function and quality-of-life at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12month post treatment. The two main outcomes will be the ODI score improvement and the proportion of participants who needs a second injection in each group at one year post treatment.

Study Design: Triple-blinded randomized controlled trial Patient Sample: Fifty participants with radiological signs of osteoarthritis and Z-Joint LBP confirmed by dual intra-articular local anesthetic injections will be recruited and randomized in two groups: CS and LP-PRP injection groups.

Method: Participants will be assessed in person, by mail or by phone at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12-months post-treatment by a blinded evaluator. Pain will be assessed by a visual analogue scale (VAS) when bending over, function by the Oswestry Low Back Disability Index (ODI), quality of life by the SF36 questionnaire and satisfaction by the Modified McNabb Scale.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Montréal, Quebec, Canada
        • Centre Hopsitalier Université de Montreal

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • - 40 years old or more; given the low prevalence of facet pain in younger adults
  • LBP present for more than six months, with an axial predominance
  • Persistent LBP after three months of non-interventional treatment
  • Pretreatment ODI score of at least 30/100 (moderate disability associated with LBP)
  • Pretreatment LBP VAS of at least 4/10
  • 80% LBP reduction 30 minutes after 2 intra-articular diagnostic blocs with Xylocaine and Marcaine
  • Radiological signs of facet joint degeneration (on X-rays, CT Scan or MRI)
  • Absence of neurological deficit
  • Sufficient knowledge of French or English to complete the questionnaires

Exclusion Criteria:

  • - Less than 40 years old
  • Failure to achieve intra-articular diagnostic block
  • Intra-articular injection of CS 3 months or less before recruitment
  • Oral corticosteroid use in the last two weeks
  • Inflammatory disease
  • Systemic infection
  • Infection at injection site
  • Vertebral fracture
  • Spine tumour
  • Surgical intervention at injection site prior to the study or planned
  • Cognitive disorder that impairs the ability to answer the questionnaires
  • Pregnancy
  • Breastfeeding
  • Coagulopathy affecting platelets
  • Drug affecting platelets that cannot be stopped (except acetylsalicylic acid)
  • Intolerance or allergies to local anesthetics, contrast agent, CS, and blood products

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Corticosteroid group
Patients will receive intra-articular z-joint injection of cortisone
Facet block using cortisone
Experimental: PRP group
Patients will receive intra-articular z-joint injection of PRP
Facet block using PRP

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 0, 3, 9, 12 months
visual analogue scale of pain scale from 0-10 (higher is worse)
0, 3, 9, 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Oswestry low back disability index
Time Frame: 0, 3, 9, 12 months
function due to back pain scale 0-100 (higher is worse)
0, 3, 9, 12 months
Change in Short Form 36 scale
Time Frame: 0, 3, 9, 12 months
quality of life scale score from 0-100 (higher is better)
0, 3, 9, 12 months
Change in Modified McNabb scale
Time Frame: 0, 3, 9, 12 months
satisfaction score 1-5 (higher is better)
0, 3, 9, 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 26, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 12, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 7, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Cortisone injection

3
Subscribe