Effects of Low Frequency Magnet Therapy on Spasticity in Patients With Cerebral Palsy

February 7, 2022 updated by: Ali AlGhamdi, King Fahad Armed Forces Hospital

Placebo Controlled, Randomized, Double Blind, Clinical Trial of the Effects of Low Frequency Magnet Therapy on Spasticity in Patients With Cerebral Palsy

Background: Spasticity is a major challenge in patients with cerebral palsy (CP). It may cause unwanted complications and may affect the patient's quality of life. Currently there is no satisfactory long lasting control of spasticity. Many lines of evidence indicate that magnet therapy may be a useful intervention in the management of spasticity. Several studies showed that magnet may inhibit neuronal firing in the human nervous system; however, its effects weren't studied on spasticity. Objectives: The goal of the present study was to determine the short-and long-term effects of pulsed low frequency magnetic field therapy on spasticity in patient with CP. Methods: 48 patients with CP, who have measureable level of spasticity, were selected. The sample was divided randomly into active magnet group (received magnet therapy, 32 subjects) and placebo group (16 subjects). At the end of the 4th week the magnet group was divided into two sub-groups: 1st sub-group received magnet therapy for another 4 weeks while the other received the placebo. Measurements was taken at baseline, 4th, 8th and 12th weeks. Modified Ashworth Scale was used to measure spasticity, foot pressure platform system was used to measure the contact area and the maximum force of the feet, gross motor function measure (GMFM) was used to measure the functional level of the patients. The cerebral palsy quality of life (CP-QoL) questionnaire was used to measure the patients' various dimensions of quality of life.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

48

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

4 years to 14 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A confirmed diagnosis of diplegic or quadriplegic CP of both genders,
  • Able to stand without assistance.
  • Age from 4-16 years
  • Measureable spasticity (1 or more according to the Modified Ashworth Scale).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have recent organ transplants.
  • Have heart pace maker.
  • Have cardiac arrhythmia, tachy cardiac conditions or large aneurysm.
  • Have heavy psychosis.
  • Underwent any neuromuscular blockers of Spasticity.
  • Underwent any surgery of tendon lengthening before or during the study.
  • Have epileptic episodes.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: 12 sessions of magnet
EXPERIMENTAL: 24 sessions of magnet
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo magnet intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline Modified Ashowreth Scale at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Time Frame: baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
measure the muscle resistance following a passive stretch - grades from (0 - 4), lower score means better outcome
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Change from baseline Gross Motor Function Scale at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Time Frame: baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
to evaluate the children with CP according to their motor functional ability - Scores (0% - 100%) where higher grade means better outcome.
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Change from baseline Feet Contact Area at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Time Frame: baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
The weight distribution between the feet and the ground - Higher grade means better outcome
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Change from baseline Feet Maximum Force at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Time Frame: baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Measuring Feet Maximum Force of the participants - Higher grade means better outcome
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Change from baseline Cerebral Palsy Quality of Live Questionnaire (Social well-being and acceptance dimension) at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Time Frame: baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
  1. Items numbers in the questionnaire: (1,3,4,5,6,7,10,11,12,13,14,15).
  2. Each item has an answer from one to nine; where 1= very unhappy, 3 = unhappy, 5 = neither happy nor unhappy, 7 = happy, and 9 = very happy.
  3. To be calculated by summation of all the dimension's score.
  4. Higher score means better outcome
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Change from baseline Cerebral Palsy Quality of Live Questionnaire (Functioning dimension) at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Time Frame: baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
  1. Items numbers in the questionnaire: (8,22,23,24,27,29,34,35,37,38,39,40).
  2. Each item has an answer from one to nine; where 1= very unhappy, 3 = unhappy, 5 = neither happy nor unhappy, 7 = happy, and 9 = very happy.
  3. To be calculated by summation of all the dimension's score.
  4. Higher score means better outcome
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Change from baseline Cerebral Palsy Quality of Live Questionnaire (Participation and physical health dimension) at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Time Frame: baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
  1. Items numbers in the questionnaire: (9,16,17,18,19,20,21,25,26,30,37).
  2. Each item has an answer from one to nine; where 1= very unhappy, 3 = unhappy, 5 = neither happy nor unhappy, 7 = happy, and 9 = very happy.
  3. To be calculated by summation of all the dimension's score.
  4. Higher score means better outcome
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Change from baseline Cerebral Palsy Quality of Live Questionnaire (Emotional well-being dimension) at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Time Frame: baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
  1. Items numbers in the questionnaire: (2,28,31,32,33,52).
  2. Each item has an answer from one to nine; where 1= very unhappy, 3 = unhappy, 5 = neither happy nor unhappy, 7 = happy, and 9 = very happy.
  3. To be calculated by summation of all the dimension's score.
  4. Higher score means better outcome.
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Change from baseline Cerebral Palsy Quality of Live Questionnaire (Access to services dimension) at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Time Frame: baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
  1. Items numbers in the questionnaire: (41, 42, 43, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61).
  2. Each item has an answer from one to nine; where 1= very unhappy, 3 = unhappy, 5 = neither happy nor unhappy, 7 = happy, and 9 = very happy.
  3. To be calculated by summation of all the dimension's score.
  4. Higher score means better outcome.
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Change from baseline Cerebral Palsy Quality of Live Questionnaire (Pain and impact of disability dimension) at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Time Frame: baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
  1. Items numbers in the questionnaire: (44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51).
  2. Each item has an answer from one to nine; where (1= not bothered at all) to (9 = very bothered).
  3. To be calculated by summation of all the dimension's score.
  4. Higher score means worse outcome.
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Change from baseline Cerebral Palsy Quality of Live Questionnaire (Family health dimension) at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Time Frame: baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
  1. Items numbers in the questionnaire: (62, 63, 64, 65).
  2. Each item has an answer from one to nine; where 1= very unhappy, 3 = unhappy, 5 = neither happy nor unhappy, 7 = happy, and 9 = very happy.
  3. To be calculated by summation of all the dimension's score.
  4. Higher score means better outcome.
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Comparison of Modified Ashowreth Scale scores between the three groups from baseline at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Time Frame: baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
measure the muscle resistance following a passive stretch - grades from (0 - 4), lower score means better outcome
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Comparison of Gross Motor Function Scale scores between the three groups from baseline at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Time Frame: baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
to evaluate the children with CP according to their motor functional ability - Scores (0% - 100%) where higher grade means better outcome.
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Comparison of Feet Contact Area scores between the three groups from baseline at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Time Frame: baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
The weight distribution between the feet and the ground - Higher grade means better outcome
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Comparison of Feet Maximum Force scores between the three groups from baseline at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Time Frame: baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Measuring Feet Maximum Force of the participants - Higher grade means better outcome
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Comparison of Cerebral Palsy Quality of Live Questionnaire (Social well-being and acceptance dimension) scores between the three groups from baseline at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Time Frame: baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
  1. Items numbers in the questionnaire: (1,3,4,5,6,7,10,11,12,13,14,15).
  2. Each item has an answer from one to nine; where 1= very unhappy, 3 = unhappy, 5 = neither happy nor unhappy, 7 = happy, and 9 = very happy.
  3. To be calculated by summation of all the dimension's score.
  4. Higher score means better outcome
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Comparison of Cerebral Palsy Quality of Live Questionnaire (Functioning dimension) scores between the three groups from baseline at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Time Frame: baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
  1. Items numbers in the questionnaire: (8,22,23,24,27,29,34,35,37,38,39,40).
  2. Each item has an answer from one to nine; where 1= very unhappy, 3 = unhappy, 5 = neither happy nor unhappy, 7 = happy, and 9 = very happy.
  3. To be calculated by summation of all the dimension's score.
  4. Higher score means better outcome
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Comparison of Cerebral Palsy Quality of Live Questionnaire (Participation and physical health dimension) scores between the three groups from baseline at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Time Frame: baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
  1. Items numbers in the questionnaire: (9,16,17,18,19,20,21,25,26,30,37).
  2. Each item has an answer from one to nine; where 1= very unhappy, 3 = unhappy, 5 = neither happy nor unhappy, 7 = happy, and 9 = very happy.
  3. To be calculated by summation of all the dimension's score.
  4. Higher score means better outcome
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Comparison of Cerebral Palsy Quality of Live Questionnaire (Emotional well-being dimension) scores between the three groups from baseline at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Time Frame: baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
  1. Items numbers in the questionnaire: (2,28,31,32,33,52).
  2. Each item has an answer from one to nine; where 1= very unhappy, 3 = unhappy, 5 = neither happy nor unhappy, 7 = happy, and 9 = very happy.
  3. To be calculated by summation of all the dimension's score.
  4. Higher score means better outcome.
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Comparison of Cerebral Palsy Quality of Live Questionnaire (Access to services dimension) scores between the three groups from baseline at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Time Frame: baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
  1. Items numbers in the questionnaire: (41, 42, 43, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61).
  2. Each item has an answer from one to nine; where 1= very unhappy, 3 = unhappy, 5 = neither happy nor unhappy, 7 = happy, and 9 = very happy.
  3. To be calculated by summation of all the dimension's score.
  4. Higher score means better outcome.
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Comparison of Cerebral Palsy Quality of Live Questionnaire (Pain and impact of disability dimension) scores between the three groups from baseline at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Time Frame: baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
  1. Items numbers in the questionnaire: (44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51).
  2. Each item has an answer from one to nine; where (1= not bothered at all) to (9 = very bothered).
  3. To be calculated by summation of all the dimension's score.
  4. Higher score means worse outcome.
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
Comparison of Cerebral Palsy Quality of Live Questionnaire (Family health dimension) scores between the three groups from baseline at 4, 8 and 12 weeks
Time Frame: baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week
  1. Items numbers in the questionnaire: (62, 63, 64, 65).
  2. Each item has an answer from one to nine; where 1= very unhappy, 3 = unhappy, 5 = neither happy nor unhappy, 7 = happy, and 9 = very happy.
  3. To be calculated by summation of all the dimension's score.
  4. Higher score means better outcome.
baseline, 4th week, 8th week and 12th week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2014

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2015

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 8, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

February 16, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

February 16, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spastic Cerebral Palsy

Clinical Trials on Low frequency magnetic therapy

3
Subscribe