Animation Education Program Applied to Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Patients

Animation Education Program Applied to Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Patients Effect on Patient Care Results: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Objectives This study investigated the effect of animation education developed for respiratory rehabilitation among sleeve gastrectomy patients on patient care results.

Design This is a randomized controlled study. Method A total of 66 patients who were going to have sleeve gastrectomy were randomly divided into two groups each including 33 participants. The intervention group was provided with animation education. The control group received routine face-to-face education. Postoperative risk of respiratory complications, presence of dyspnea, nausea, and vomiting, frequency of postoperative respiratory exercises, and satisfaction with postoperative respiratory education were examined. Patients' pain and sleep quality were examined one day before the surgery and on the postoperative first and fifth days.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Surgery; Educational Problems
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: Animation Education Program Applied to Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Patients

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 66
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Turkey
  • Erzurum, Turkey, 25070
    • Ataturk University

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: Child; Adult; Older Adult
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

The patients,

who are in clinical treatment for sleeve gastrectomy; who are 18 years of age or older, mentally healthy; who can speak and understand Turkish; who owns and can use smartphones; who do not have chronic diseases related to the respiratory system (lung diseases, etc.); who are volunteers, will be included in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

The Patients

who are a lung infection in the last month who are neurological disease who are major psychiatric diagnosis who are vision and hearing problems who are intolerable dyspnea who do not agree to participate in the study, will be excluded

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Animation Education Program Applied to Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Patients; The intervention group is the group in which the investigors applied animation education program Intervention: Behavioral: Animation Education Program	Behavioral: Animation Education Program Applied to Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Patients; Behavioral: Animation Education Program The investigators will apply Animation Education Program.
No Intervention: Standard Clinical Care Applied to Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Patients; The control group is the group that receives standard clinical care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Visual Analog Scale	Pain levels Visual Analog Scale (VAS): The VAS was used to evaluate the severity of pain in patients. VAS is a 10 cm ruler that shows no pain on one edge and unbearable pain on the other edge. Therefore, patients are asked to evaluate their pain between 0 "no pain" and 10 "unbearable pain." They show the severity of their pain using a sign on that ruler. The point indicated by the patient is recorded from the starting point of 0. VAS is an understandable and easily applicable scale to evaluate the pain levels of patients	until the treatment is completed,an average of 5 days
Richard Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ)	Sleep quality Richard Campbell Sleep Questionnaire (RCSQ) The scale was developed by Richards in 1987. Its Turkish validity and reliability study was conducted by Özlü and Özer in 2015. RCSQ evaluates the depth of night sleep, time to fall asleep, frequency of awakening, time awake when awakened, sleep quality, and the noise level in the environment. The scale consists of 6 questions. Each item is scored between 0 and 100 using the VAS. A score of 0-25 points obtained from the scale indicates very bad sleep and 76-100 indicates very good sleep.	until the treatment is completed,an average of 5 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Respiratory complications question form	respiratory complications	until the treatment is completed,an average of 5 days

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Ataturk University

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): February 1, 2020
• Primary Completion (Actual): June 1, 2021
• Study Completion (Actual): June 15, 2021

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: December 29, 2021
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: February 12, 2022
• First Posted (Actual): February 23, 2022

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): May 9, 2022
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: May 4, 2022
• Last Verified: May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Other Study ID Numbers: AEP16

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No