Functional and Electromyographical Changes After PRP or Dextrose Injection in Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis

April 11, 2022 updated by: Chen Yueh

Functional and Electromyographical Changes After Platelet Rich Plasma or Dextrose Injection in Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis

The purpose of this study is to find out functional and electromyographical changes after platelet rich plasma and dextrose injection in chronic lateral epicondylitis.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Both platelet rich plasma (PRP) and dextrose treat chronic lateral epicondylalgia (CLE), mechanically by enhancing tendon cell proliferation, differentiation, and maturation. In fact, hypertonic glucose injection is much cost-effective as compared to PRP. Hence, it is of clinical value to compare the recovery of extensor carpi radialis breveis (ECRB) muscular structure and muscular function between PRP and hypertonic glucose injection.

The investigators will measure functional outcome and force gradation after PRP and glucose injection in CLE patients using multi-electromyography, functional score (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE)) and force (gripping power and maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) during wrist extension) before and 12 weeks after injection. The hypotheses of this study are 1) lower MVC and greater force fluctuations of a force task in the affected muscle in individuals with CLE; 2) lower discharge rate and higher discharge variability of motor units of a force task in the affected muscle in individuals with CLE than those in the contralateral sound side; 3) the PRP group shows a greater improvement in a visual analog scale (VAS), DASH, PRTEE score, MVC, and the size of force fluctuations than the glucose group after treatment. 4) the PRP group shows a greater discharge rate and lower discharge variability for a force task than the glucose group after treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

90

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Tainan, Taiwan, 72152
        • Recruiting
        • Chen Yueh
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

The control group

Inclusion criteria:

1. The ages of 20-65 years without any neurological or muscular disease.

Exclusion criteria:

1. Systemic disorders such as diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, or hepatitis

The treatment group (Experimental group)

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with lateral epicondylitis in the elbow (age: 20-65 years old)
  2. Pain unresponsive to 1 of 3 conventional therapy programs (local steroid injections, physical/occupational therapy, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications)
  3. History of elbow pain for at least 3 months
  4. Elbow pain at least 50 mm/100 mm using a visual analog scale (VAS)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Healthy population between the ages of 20-65 years
  2. Pregnancy
  3. History of bleeding disorder, anemia, or any blood disorder (such as Hemoglobin <11 g/dL; Hematocrit <33%; Platelet count outside of the normal range of 150 to 400 x1000/u)
  4. Active bilateral elbow tendinosis within 4 weeks, previous surgery for elbow tendinosis or fracture of the affected elbow
  5. History of arthritis or, cervical radiculopathy, carpal tunnel syndrome on the affected side within 1 year before randomization
  6. Systemic disorders such as diabetes, rheumatoid arthritis, or hepatitis
  7. Uncooperative patient or patient with neurological disorders who is incapable of following directions or who is predictably unwilling to return for follow-up examinations
  8. Hypothyroidism
  9. Received local steroid injections within 6 weeks, physical/occupational therapy within 4 weeks, or non- steroidal anti-inflammatory medications within 1 week
  10. Intolerance to acetaminophen

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: platelet rich plasma group
Preparing 2 mL of PRP with concentration of 4-6 times the average normal values, 20mL of blood will be first collected from the patient's upper limb cubital vein using an 18G needle.
Preparing 2 mL of PRP with concentration of 4-6 times the average normal values, 20mL of blood will be first collected from the patient's upper limb cubital vein using an 18G needle. A local subcutaneous anesthesia (2 ml of 1% lidocaine) will be finished by the orthopedist.
Active Comparator: dextrose group
4 ml of PRP + 4 ml of 0.9% saline -h 2 ml of 1% lidocaine (10-ml syringe).
The group will use 4 ml of PRP + 4 ml of 0.9% saline -h 2 ml of 1% lidocaine (10-ml syringe).
No Intervention: Placebo (the control group)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain score on a visual analog scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
a 10 cm line with anchor statements on the left (no pain) and on the right (extreme pain)
12 weeks
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score
Time Frame: 12 weeks
scored 0 (no disability) to 100
12 weeks
Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation (PRTEE) score
Time Frame: 12 weeks
pain and disability from 0 to 10(0 = no difficulty, 10 = unable to do)
12 weeks
Level of force
Time Frame: 12 weeks
extension of maximal voluntary contraction
12 weeks
Level of force
Time Frame: 12 weeks
gripping power
12 weeks
The gradation of muscle force(the surface electromyogram)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
the number of motor units active
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yueh Chen, Madou Sin-Lau Hosptial, the Presbyterian Church in Taiwan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 25, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tennis Elbow

Clinical Trials on Platelet Rich Plasma

3
Subscribe