Transcranial Pulse Stimulation Open-label Self-controlled Trial For Mild Neurocognitive Disorder

April 11, 2022 updated by: The University of Hong Kong

Efficacy and Safety of Transcranial Pulse Stimulation (TPS) in Older Adults With Mild Neurocognitive Disorder - an Open-label Self-controlled Trial

Background:

A significant proportion of older adults suffered from age-related diseases particularly dementia, also known as major neurocognitive disorder (NCD), which is becoming a worldwide health burden. In principle, Interventions for dementia should have optimal benefits at the earliest preclinical stage yet no evidence has been found to support a particular pharmacological approach in preventing cognitive decline during the stage of mild NCD. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS), on the other hand, is increasingly recognized as a potential alternative to tackle this problem. Typical NIBS include transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). A new kind of NIBS named Transcranial Pulse stimulation (TPS) is also recently used for treating patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD).TPS is a kind of NIBS that uses repetitive sin ultrashort pulses in the ultrasound frequency range to stimulate the brain, and it can provide better spatial precision and reach deeper brain regions comparing to tDCS and TMS. The mechanism of TPS is to convert the mechanical TPS stimulus into biochemical responses, thus influence some fundamental cell functions. A recent study showed that there is a significant improvement in using TPS in treating AD. However, there has been no study investigating the effect of TPS on older adults with mild NCD.

Objective:

This study is an open-label self-controlled study to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of TPS on cognition in older adults with mild NCD. We hypothesized that a 2-week TPS intervention could significantly improve patient's global cognition which will be maintained for 12 weeks.

Design:

The current study is an open-label self-controlled interventional trial of TPS guided by neuro-navigation using structural MRI. All participants will undergo the treatment as usual (TAU) period as self-controlled for 12 weeks. They will then receive a six-session TPS intervention for 2 weeks with three sessions per week. A 12 weeks post-intervention assessment will then be conducted.

Data Analysis:

Primary outcome and secondary outcomes assessment would be carried out at baseline, after TAU period, immediately after the intervention and 12 weeks after the intervention. The primary outcome will be the change of the Hong Kong Chinese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (HK-MoCA). The secondary outcome includes specific cognitive domains, daily functioning, mood, and apathy. The intention-to-treat analysis would be carried out.

Significance:

The result of the current study would provide further data on the effectiveness and tolerability of TPS as a new treatment in patients with mild NCD.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Background Age-related diseases, particularly dementia, now known as major neurocognitive disorder (NCD), are a great health burden in Hong Kong and worldwide. Interventions that aim to ameliorate cognitive decline or prevent dementia offer a compelling alternative paradigm for reducing the impact of the disease, not only on individuals but also on their families and on society. In principle, to achieve its optimal benefits, intervention for dementia should begin at the earliest preclinical stage. However, no evidence has been found to support a pharmacological approach to the prevention, reduction, or postponement of cognitive decline during the stage of mild NCD. Besides pharmacological approaches, non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) is increasingly recognised as a potential alternative to tackle this problem. The typical examples of NIBS are transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Besides these, there is a new NIBS named transcranial pulse stimulation (TPS), also known as low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy (Li-ESWT), which recently obtained CE marking in 2018 for the treatment of the central nervous system (CNS) in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD).

The introduction of TPS TPS is using repetitive single ultrashort pulses in the ultrasound frequency range to stimulate the brain. With a neuro-navigation device, TPS can achieve this in a highly focal and precisely targeted manner. TPS differs from tDCS and TMS using direct or induced electric current. Using electric current to stimulate the brain may be limited by the problem of conductivity and failure to reach deep brain regions. Instead, low-intensity focused ultrasound provides good spatial precision and resolution to noninvasively modulate subcortical areas, despite the problem of skull attenuation. Using lower ultrasound frequencies TPS can successfully improve skull penetration in humans.

Biological mechanism of TPS The basic mechanism of TPS is mechanotransduction. It is a biological pathway through which the cells convert the mechanical TPS stimulus into biochemical responses, thus influencing some fundamental cell functions such as migration, proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis. The ultrashort ultrasound pulse could enhance the cell proliferation and differentiation in cultured neural stem cell, which plays an important role in the repair of brain function in CNS diseases. The TPS may affect neurons and induce neuroplastic effects through several pathways including increasing cell permeability, stimulation of mechanosensitive ion channels, the release of nitric oxide resulting in vasodilation, increased metabolic activity and angiogenesis, stimulation of vascular growth factors (VEGF) and stimulation of brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF).

Clinical effects of TPS Focused ultrasound demonstrated the neuromodulation effect in the human brain. Focused ultrasound can modulate the amplitude of somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) when targeted at the cortical regions that generate these potentials and even the deep structure such as the thalamus. TPS, previously named as Li-ESWT was applied to five patients with unresponsive wakefulness syndrome. They received 4-week (3 times per week) treatment, 4000 pulses each, every 6 months for an average of two to four years. There was significant improvement in the vigilance and in three patients the percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube could be removed due to improved oropharyngeal motor function. In the most recent study, TPS was applied to 35 elderly with AD. They were treated in 3 TPS sessions (6000 pulses each) per week for 2-4 weeks, either over classical AD affected sites such as the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, areas of the memory and language network, or over all accessible brain areas (global brain stimulation). Significant improvement in the CERAD (Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease) score was demonstrated (immediately as well as 1 and 3 months after stimulation. fMRI also showed significant increased connectivity within the memory network.

Safety issue of TPS TPS uses very low energy for the brain stimulation. In vivo animal TPS study did not cause any tissue damage despite using 6-7-fold higher energy levels compared with those in human studies. Furthermore, the intervention did not cause any serious adverse effects such as intracranial bleeding, oedema or other intracranial pathology, as confirmed with MRI in a previous AD study. Few subjects reported headache (4%), pain or pressure (1%) and mood deterioration (3%). The CE marked TPS system has proven to be safe in >1500 treatments.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Calvin Pak Wing Cheng, MBBS (HKU)
  • Phone Number: 852 22554486
  • Email: chengpsy@hku.hk

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Tommy Kwan Hin Fong, MPsyMed
  • Phone Number: 852 64214186
  • Email: tommykhf@hku.hk

Study Locations

      • Hong Kong, Hong Kong
        • Recruiting
        • The Hong Kong Jockey Club Building for Interdisciplinary Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1. 60 years of age or above
  • 2. Chinese ethnicity
  • 3. Mild neurocognitive disorder (NCD) meeting the 5th Edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) criteria
  • 4. At least 3 months of stable anti-dementia therapy prior to enrolment (unchanged medication, if receiving)
  • 5. Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. A HK-MoCA score below the second percentile according to the subject's age and education level
  • 2. Alcohol or substance dependence
  • 3. Concomitant unstable major medical conditions or major neurological conditions such as brain tumour, brain aneurysm
  • 4. Haemophilia or other blood clotting disorders or thrombosis
  • 5. Significant communicative impairments
  • 6. Participants with any metal implant in brain or treated area of the head

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment Group
A 2-week intervention TPS intervention will result in a significant improvement in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (HK-MoCA; Hong Kong Chinese version), which will be maintained for 12 weeks.

A global brain stimulation approach, which homogenously distributes the total energy of 6000 TPS pulses per session over all accessible brain areas.

Prefrontal, Temporal and Occipital brain areas were stimulated by ultrashort (3μs) ultrasound pulses with typical energy levels of 0.2-0.25 mJ/mm2 and pulse frequencies of 4-5 Hz (pulses per second).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Global Cognition
Time Frame: Baseline, 12-week Treatment-As-Usual, Immediate after 2-week TPS Treatment, 12-week Follow-up
Global cognition measured using the Hong Kong Chinese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (HK-MoCA) is our primary outcome. The total score ranges from 0-30 with higher scores indicating better cognition.
Baseline, 12-week Treatment-As-Usual, Immediate after 2-week TPS Treatment, 12-week Follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Verbal Fluency
Time Frame: Baseline, 12-week Treatment-As-Usual, Immediate after 2-week TPS Treatment, 12-week Follow-up
Measured by the category verbal fluency test.
Baseline, 12-week Treatment-As-Usual, Immediate after 2-week TPS Treatment, 12-week Follow-up
Change in Working Memory
Time Frame: Baseline, 12-week Treatment-As-Usual, Immediate after 2-week TPS Treatment, 12-week Follow-up
Measured by forward and backward digit span test.
Baseline, 12-week Treatment-As-Usual, Immediate after 2-week TPS Treatment, 12-week Follow-up
Change in Executive Functioning
Time Frame: Baseline, 12-week Treatment-As-Usual, Immediate after 2-week TPS Treatment, 12-week Follow-up
Measured by the Trail Making Test Parts A and B.
Baseline, 12-week Treatment-As-Usual, Immediate after 2-week TPS Treatment, 12-week Follow-up
Change in Attention
Time Frame: Baseline, 12-week Treatment-As-Usual, Immediate after 2-week TPS Treatment, 12-week Follow-up
Measured by the Stroop test.
Baseline, 12-week Treatment-As-Usual, Immediate after 2-week TPS Treatment, 12-week Follow-up
Change in Depressive Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline, 12-week Treatment-As-Usual, Immediate after 2-week TPS Treatment, 12-week Follow-up
Depressive symptoms will be assessed by the HAM-D-17, which is a widely used and reliable measure of depressive symptoms. Scores range from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating more severe depression.
Baseline, 12-week Treatment-As-Usual, Immediate after 2-week TPS Treatment, 12-week Follow-up
Change in Daily Functioning
Time Frame: Baseline, 12-week Treatment-As-Usual, Immediate after 2-week TPS Treatment, 12-week Follow-up
Instrumental activities of daily living will be assessed with the Hong Kong Chinese version of the Lawton Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Scale.
Baseline, 12-week Treatment-As-Usual, Immediate after 2-week TPS Treatment, 12-week Follow-up
Change in Apathy
Time Frame: Baseline, 12-week Treatment-As-Usual, Immediate after 2-week TPS Treatment, 12-week Follow-up
The severity of apathy will be measured using the Hong Kong version of the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES-HK) (in press, abstract). The AES-HK is an 18-item scale designed to measure apathy as a neuropsychiatric symptom. It is the most psychometrically sound measure of apathy across some disease populations. The internal consistency of the AES-HK was estimated using Cronbach's alpha, which yielded a coefficient of 0.946. The inter-rater and test-retest reliability were both satisfactory.
Baseline, 12-week Treatment-As-Usual, Immediate after 2-week TPS Treatment, 12-week Follow-up
Change in Adverse Effects and Risk Indicators
Time Frame: Across 6 TPS Treatment sessions
A checklist of potential adverse effects associated with TPS administration will be generated from the available literature on AD. The checklist will be used to monitor tolerability and adverse events in each session throughout the intervention.
Across 6 TPS Treatment sessions
Changes in Brain Regional Volume Differences and White Matter Hyperintensities (WMH)
Time Frame: Baseline, 12-week Follow-up
Participants will receive pre and post treatment MRI scan to measure any changes in structural and functional connectivity changes in the brain. Structural MRI scans including T1- and T2-weighted fluid attenuation inversion recovery (T2-FLAIR) sequences, and Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) will be used for assessing regional volume differences and WMH across the whole brain.
Baseline, 12-week Follow-up
Change in Brain Functional Connectivity
Time Frame: Baseline, 12-week Follow-up
Participants will receive pre and post treatment MRI scan to measure any changes in structural and functional connectivity changes in the brain. Resting-state fMRI of 150 T2-weighted gradient echo planar imaging (EPI) will be acquired, during which subjects will view a fixation cross ('+') passively at the centre of the screen. All resting state-fMRI (rs-fMRI) volumes will be pre-processed, with motion correction, slice timing correction, then linearly registered to the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) standard space.
Baseline, 12-week Follow-up
Change in Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF)
Time Frame: Baseline, Immediate after 2-week TPS Treatment
A 20 ml venous blood sample will be collected from all participants before and after the TPS intervention to examine Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF).
Baseline, Immediate after 2-week TPS Treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Calvin Pak Wing Cheng, MBBS (HKU), The University of Hong Kong

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 20, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 20, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 23, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 15, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Since the study involves sensitive and private medical history from recruited or self-enrolled subjects, individual data will not be available to other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mild Neurocognitive Disorder

Clinical Trials on Transcranial Pulse Stimulation (TPS)

3
Subscribe