OA Clinic-Community CARE Model (OA CARE)

January 9, 2025 updated by: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Optimizing Osteoarthritis Care Through Clinical and Community Partnership

The purpose of this study is to test the OA Clinic-Community CARE Model (OA CARE) which will address all recommended components of knee/hip (osteoarthritis) OA care, include interventions for both patients and primary care providers (PCPs), and utilize a tailored approach that efficiently matches treatments with patients' needs.

The patient component of OA CARE will include evidence-based weight management and exercise programs for all participants (delivered through the YMCA), as well as tailored referrals to physical therapy, additional weight management or nutrition services, sleep-related services and psychological services.

The PCP component of OA CARE will include a video-based summary of current OA treatment guidelines (with emphasis on practical application), collaboration on patients' referrals to specific services described above, and progress reports on enrolled patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study will be a randomized pilot trial of OA CARE among n=60 patients with knee and/or hip osteoarthritis (OA) and overweight/obesity who are not currently meeting physical activity recommendations. Participants will be randomly assigned to OA CARE or a usual care (UC) group. Assessments will be conducted at baseline, 6 months and 12 months. Primary endpoint of the trial will be self-reported pain and function and secondary endpoint will be objectively assessed physical activity (PA), measured via accelerometer.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599
        • UNC Thurston Arthritis Research Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinician diagnosis of knee or hip OA
  • Self-reported knee or hip pain of ≥3 (scale of 0-10) on most days of the week
  • Current Weekly Physical Activity <150 minutes per week
  • Body mass index (BMI) ≥27 kg/m^2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No internet access and a device (computer, tablet, smartphone) to access the virtual weight loss intervention
  • Pain in chest when performing physical activity
  • Pain in chest when not performing physical activity
  • No documented diagnosis of knee or hip OA
  • Total knee or hip replacement surgery, meniscus tear, ligament tear, or other significant lower extremity injury or surgery in the last 6 months
  • Dementia or other memory loss condition
  • Active diagnosis of psychosis
  • Active Substance abuse disorder
  • Severe hearing or visual impairment
  • Serious/terminal illness as indicated by referral to hospice or palliative care
  • Hospitalization for cardiovascular event in last 6 months
  • History of ventricular tachycardia
  • Unstable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (2 hospitalizations within the previous 6 months and/or on oxygen)
  • Stroke with moderate to severe aphasia
  • Recent history (last 6 months) of three or more falls
  • Planning total joint replacement in next 6 months
  • Any other health conditions determined by the study team to be contraindications to a home exercise program or weight loss
  • Current participation in other study related to knee or hip osteoarthritis or physical activity
  • Unable to speak English

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: OA CARE
Participants assigned to the OA CARE intervention will receive a 12-month Medical Membership to a local YMCA and participate in a 12-week weight loss program. Participants will also work with an OA CARE Navigator, who, in partnership with their primary care provider (PCP), will identify any additional programs or resources that may help them manage their osteoarthritis (OA) symptoms.

Once assigned, participants will be contacted by the OA CARE Navigator to coordinate initiating a YMCA Medical Membership. Then, YMCA personnel will contact the participant to schedule the first Weight Loss Program (Program) group session. The Program will be delivered in groups with other OA CARE participants. Participants will also have access to all exercise facilities and programs at the YMCA during the study, and will be assigned a YMCA health coach.

After initiation of the YMCA Medical Membership, the OA CARE Navigator will discuss participant's interests in referrals to other services related to osteoarthritis (OA) management. The Navigator will provide the participant's primary care provider (PCP) with a summary of this discussion and help the participant connect to any programs or resources that do not require provider referrals.

Placebo Comparator: Usual Care
Participants assigned to this group will receive no additional treatment from the study for about 12 months.
Participants assigned to the usual care group will receive no additional treatment from the study for about 12 months. However, this group will be offered a 12-month Medical Membership to a local YMCA after completing the final assessment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6 (Follow-up)
For the WOMAC total score, the test questions are scored on a scale of 0-4. The scores for each subscale are summed up, with a possible score range of 0-20 for Pain, 0-8 for Stiffness, and 0-68 for Physical Function. The overall WOMAC score is determined by summing the scores for all three subscales and the score ranges include 0-96 (derived from a 0-4 Likert scale), with higher scores indicating worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.
Baseline, Month 6 (Follow-up)
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12 (Follow-up)
For the WOMAC total score, the test questions are scored on a scale of 0-4. The scores for each subscale are summed up, with a possible score range of 0-20 for Pain, 0-8 for Stiffness, and 0-68 for Physical Function. The overall WOMAC score is determined by summing the scores for all three subscales and the score ranges include 0-96 (derived from a 0-4 Likert scale), with higher scores indicating worse pain, stiffness, and functional limitations.
Baseline, Month 12 (Follow-up)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Pain Subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6 (Follow-up)
The WOMAC Pain Subscale is a measure of lower extremity pain. It includes 5 items rated on a Likert scale of 0 (no pain) to 4 (extreme pain), with a total range of 0-20 with higher scores indicating worse symptoms and function.
Baseline, Month 6 (Follow-up)
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Pain Subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12 (Follow-up)
The WOMAC Pain Subscale is a measure of lower extremity pain. It includes 5 items rated on a Likert scale of 0 (no pain) to 4 (extreme pain), with a total range of 0-20 with higher scores indicating worse symptoms and function.
Baseline, Month 12 (Follow-up)
Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Function Subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6 (Follow-up)
The WOMAC function subscale includes 17 items rated on a Likert scale of 0 (no difficulty) to 4 (extreme difficulty), with ranges of 0-68 for the function subscale with higher scores indicating worse symptoms and function.
Baseline, Month 6 (Follow-up)
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) Function Subscale
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12 (Follow-up)
The WOMAC function subscale includes 17 items rated on a Likert scale of 0 (no difficulty) to 4 (extreme difficulty), with ranges of 0-68 for the function subscale with higher scores indicating worse symptoms and function.
Baseline, Month 12 (Follow-up)
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Body Weight
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12 (Follow-up)
Body weight assessed using a research / clinical grade scale (e.g., Tanita) that will be calibrated regularly.
Baseline, Month 12 (Follow-up)
Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Objectively Assessed Physical Activity Per Week (Accelerometer), Log Transformed.
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6 (Follow-up)

Minutes of moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) per week measured via accelerometer.

This measure was log transformed because raw data did not meet assumptoms for statsitical models.

Baseline, Month 6 (Follow-up)
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Objectively Assessed Physical Activity Per Week (Accelerometer), Log Transformed
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12 (Follow-up)

Minutes of moderate to vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) per week measured via accelerometer.

This measure was log transformed because raw data did not meet assumptoms for statsitical models.

Baseline, Month 12 (Follow-up)
Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Steps Per Day, Log Transformed
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6 (Follow-up)
Step counts measured via accelerometer. This measure was log transformed because raw data did not meet assumptoms for statsitical models.
Baseline, Month 6 (Follow-up)
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Steps Per Day, Log Transformed
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12 (Follow-up)
Step counts measured via accelerometer. This measure was log transformed because raw data did not meet assumptoms for statsitical models.
Baseline, Month 12 (Follow-up)
Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Minutes of Any Physical Activity (PA) Per Day, Standardized to a 16 Hour Day
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6 (Follow-up)
Minutes of any PA measured via accelerometer. This measure was standardized to a 16 hour day to address between-patient differences in amount of wear time.
Baseline, Month 6 (Follow-up)
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Minutes of Any Physical Activity (PA) Per Day, Standardized to 16 Hour Day
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12 (Follow-up)
Minutes of any PA measured via accelerometer. This measure was standardized to a 16 hour day to address between-patient differences in amount of wear time.
Baseline, Month 12 (Follow-up)
Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Self-Reported Minutes of Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity Per Week, Square Root Transformed
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6 (Follow-up)
Self-Reported Physical Activity will be assessed using the Modified version of the CHAMPS (Community Health Activities Model Program for Seniors) Physical Activity Measure. Data from the questionnaire is used to determine variety, frequency, and minutes per week from physical activity. Separate scores are derived for physical activities of moderate or greater intensity (metabolic equivalents MET ≥ 3.0) and for all activities listed (light, moderate, and vigorous). Estimates of frequency (days per week) range from 0 to 7 days per week. Estimates of Variety (# different activities), while open, generally ranges from 0 to 5, values above 5 are checked. Estimates of minutes, generally range from 0 to 180 per day. Individuals reporting more than 180 minutes per day are checked. For all physical activity outcomes higher values equal a greater amount of activity. This measure was square root transformed becuase raw failed to meet assumptions for statistical analyses.
Baseline, Month 6 (Follow-up)
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Self-Reported Minutes of Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity Per Week, Square Root Transformed
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12 (Follow-up)

Self-Reported Physical Activity will be assessed using the Modified version of the CHAMPS (Community Health Activities Model Program for Seniors) Physical Activity Measure. Data from the questionnaire is used to determine variety, frequency, and minutes per week from physical activity. Separate scores are derived for physical activities of moderate or greater intensity (metabolic equivalents (MET) ≥ 3.0) and for all activities listed (light, moderate, and vigorous). Estimates of frequency (days per week) range from 0 to 7 days per week. Estimates of Variety (# different activities), while open, generally ranges from 0 to 5, values above 5 are checked. Estimates of minutes, generally range from 0 to 180 per day. Individuals reporting more than 180 minutes per day are checked. For all physical activity outcomes higher values equal a greater amount of activity.

This measure was square root transformed because raw data did not meet assumptions for statistical models.

Baseline, Month 12 (Follow-up)
Change From Baseline to Month 6 in Sedentary Minutes Per Day, Standardized to a 16 Hour Day
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 6 (Follow-up)
Sedentary minutes measured via accelerometer This measure was standardized to a 16 hour day to address between-patient differences in amount of wear time.
Baseline, Month 6 (Follow-up)
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Sedentary Minutes Per Day, Standardized to a 16 Hour Day
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12 (Follow-up)
Sedentary minutes measured via accelerometer This measure was standardized to a 16 hour day to address between-patient differences in amount of wear time.
Baseline, Month 12 (Follow-up)
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in 30-second Chair Stand Test
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12 (Follow-up)
Assessed to test participant leg strength and endurance. Measured by total number of chair stands (up and down equals one stand) completed in 30 seconds.
Baseline, Month 12 (Follow-up)
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in Timed Up-and-go (TUG) Test
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12 (Follow-up)
Assessed to measure participant functional mobility. Measured by how many seconds it takes for participant to stand up, walk to the mark, turn around, return & sit back into a chair with their back resting on the back of the chair.
Baseline, Month 12 (Follow-up)
Change From Baseline to Month 12 in 2-minute March Test
Time Frame: Baseline, Month 12 (Follow-up)
Assessed to evaluate participant functional aerobic endurance. Measured by number of steps completed in 2 minutes.
Baseline, Month 12 (Follow-up)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kelli D Allen, PhD, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 7, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 8, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

February 8, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 21, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

April 27, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Deidentified individual data that supports the results will be shared following publication provided the investigator who proposes to use the data has approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB), Independent Ethics Committee (IEC), or Research Ethics Board (REB), as applicable, and executes a data use/ sharing agreement with University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC).

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will become available following publication of primary and secondary outcomes. Research study records will be maintained for no less than 6 years following the completion of the study.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data will be accessible following publication of study results and will be available for no less than 6 years following the completion of the study.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on OA CARE Intervention

Subscribe