Diagnosis of Nodules ≤2 cm Based on US and CEUS Compared With Current Clinical Procedure

December 11, 2022 updated by: Tianjin Third Central Hospital

Screening and Diagnosis of Nodules ≤2 cm in High-risk HCC Patients in China Based on US and CEUS: a Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study

Due to different etiologies, diagnosis and treatment of HCC in China is different from that in Western countries.US is an important screening method for HCC in patients with liver cirrhosis. CEUS, as an enhanced imaging method based on US, has the advantages of convenience, non-radiation, low cost, short examination time, and the diagnostic performance of HCC is comparable to that of CECT, CEMRI, and hepatobiliary-specific MRI.

It is of great significance to consider the cost-effectiveness of each examination based on the principle of cost minimization. Therefore, we propose immediate CEUS examination for suspicious lesions ≤2 cm screened by US, and determine the diagnostic process of further diagnostic methods based on the CEUS results. The aim of this study is to establish a screening and diagnosis process for HCC ≤2 cm suitable for China considering time effect, economic effect and diagnostic efficiency.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

6730

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Tianjin
      • Tianjin, Tianjin, China, 300170
        • Recruiting
        • Tianjin Third Central Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients are at high risk of HCC.
  2. The ages of patients are between 18 and 80.
  3. Patients are with solid liver lesion(s) ≤ 2 cm detected by US.
  4. Patient signs the informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients are with liver cirrhosis due to congenital hepatic fibrosis or due to hepatic vascular diseases such as hereditary telangiectasia, Budd-Chiari syndrome, chronic portal vein occlusion syndrome, congestive heart disease.
  2. Patient's age is < 18 years old or > 80 years old.
  3. Patients with known hypersensitivity to CEUS, CECT, CEMRI, or hepatobiliary-specific MRI contrast agents.
  4. Patient is a pregnant or breastfeeding woman.
  5. Patient is not diagnosed based on the reference diagnostic criteria required by the study.
  6. Patient is considered to be unsuitable to participate in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Immediate CEUS group
CEUS (SonoVue) was performed immediately after routine US screening of suspicious lesions. The lesions were classified according to CEUS examination by the diagnosing physician, including consideration of HCC, suspected HCC, and benign lesions. Further hepatobiliary-specific MRI (Modis/Primexian) was performed for lesions considered HCC or suspicious for HCC, and benign lesions were followed up. The diagnostic findings of hepatobiliary-specific MRI were classified by the diagnosing physician and included consideration of HCC, suspected HCC, and benign lesions. For hepatobiliary-specific MRI lesions considered HCC or suspicious for HCC, pathological examination was performed, and benign lesions were followed up.
Subjects will receive CEUS examination immediately for the suspicious lesion detected by US.
No Intervention: Current clinical procedure group
After the suspicious lesions were screened by routine US, CECT, CEMRI and hepatobiliary-specific MRI (the first enhanced imaging examination) were independently selected by clinicians. According to the first examination results of the contrast-enhanced image, the diagnosis was classified by the diagnosing physician, including considering HCC, suspicious HCC, and benign lesions. Another contrast-enhanced imaging examination (CECT or CEMRI or hepatobiliary-specific MRI or CEUS) was performed again for lesions considered or suspected of HCC (second contrast-enhanced imaging study), and negative lesions were followed up. According to the examination results of the second enhanced imaging, the classification includes considering HCC, suspicious HCC, and benign. Pathological examination was performed for lesions considered HCC or suspicious for HCC on the second enhanced image, and benign lesions were followed up.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic performance based on US and immediate CEUS with current routine
Time Frame: 6 to 12 months
The diagnostic efficacy,including sensitivity, specificity, accurary and AUC, of the two groups for HCC from the detection of suspicious lesions by routine US screening to the final diagnosis.
6 to 12 months
Time benefits based on US and immediate CEUS with current routine
Time Frame: 6 to 12 months
Time from the detection of suspicious lesions by routine US screening to the first diagnosis of HCC by enhanced imaging examinations and the final diagnosis of HCC.
6 to 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The economic benefit based on US and immediate CEUS with current routine
Time Frame: 6 to 12 months
The cost of imaging studies from the discovery of suspicious lesions by routine US screening to the final clinical diagnosis of HCC or the clinical diagnosis of benign lesions.
6 to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 26, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 4, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 13, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 11, 2022

Last Verified

December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Liver Cirrhosis

Clinical Trials on Immediate CEUS

3
Subscribe