Risk Prediction and Its Intelligent Assessment for Cognitive Impairment Among Community-dwelling Older Adults

April 2, 2024 updated by: Xiaozhen LV, Peking University Sixth Hospital
Cognitive impairment is one of the core early signs of dementia, and it is also a key stage for community-based dementia prevention. Accurate and convenient prediction of cognitive impairment can help the community to identify and manage the high-risk population of dementia. Previous studies had developed several dementia predicting models, but such models may be not suitable for cognitive impairment prediction. Based on the national representative follow-up data of Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS), this project aims to develop and validate a brief cognitive impairment prediction algorithm among the community-dwelling elderly, using machine learning methods (such as Logistic regression, Naïve Bayes model, Extreme Gradient Boosting Tree and so on). Finally, based on the constructed model, an easy-to-use online intelligent assessment tool for predicting cognitive impairment risk will be developed. The general practitioners, social workers and the elderly would be invited to use the tool and we will revise the tool according to their suggestions and comments. This project is expected to provide scientific basis and technical support for community-based dementia prevention, and will also be useful for the elderly to easily understand their cognitive health.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

13228

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China, 100191
        • Peking University Six Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population of this project was those community-dwelling older adults with normal cognitive function at baseline and completed cognitive function assessment three years later.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Aged 65 or over at baseline;
  2. With normal cognitive function at baseline (score ≥ 18 on the Chinese version of Mini-Mental State Examination, MMSE);
  3. Completed MMSE assessment three years later;
  4. Provided informed consent voluntarily.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Aged <65;
  2. had a history of dementia or MMSE score < 18 at baseline;
  3. lost to follow-up or without cognitive function assessment three years later;
  4. Refused to participate the survey.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Training cohort
The training cohort will be used for model development.
Testing cohort
The testing cohort, a new cohort compared with the training cohort, will be used for model external validation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
AUC
Time Frame: an average of 3 years after baseline assessement
the AUC of the prediciton model based on the test data
an average of 3 years after baseline assessement

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
sensitivity
Time Frame: an average of 3 years after baseline assessement
the sensitivity of the prediciton model based on the test data
an average of 3 years after baseline assessement
specificity
Time Frame: an average of 3 years after baseline assessement
the specificity of the prediciton model based on the test data
an average of 3 years after baseline assessement
positive predictive value
Time Frame: an average of 3 years after baseline assessement
the positive predictive value of the prediciton model based on the test data
an average of 3 years after baseline assessement
negative predictive value
Time Frame: an average of 3 years after baseline assessement
the negative predictive value of the prediciton model based on the test data
an average of 3 years after baseline assessement

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Feifei Gao, Ph.D, Peking University Six Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 11, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 17, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 23, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 4, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 2, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SHOUFA2020-3-4114

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Impairment

Subscribe