Implant Stability Changes In Dental Implants Installed By Osseodensification and Conventional Methods

May 22, 2022 updated by: Noor Abdulhakeem, University of Baghdad

Implant Stability Changes In Dental Implants Installed By Osseodensification and Conventional Methods: A Randomized Controlled Study

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of Osseodensification on implant stability during the healing period The objective of this study is to compare between dental implant stability after osteotomy site preparation using osseodensification technique and conventional drilling technique immediately after implant installation (primary stability) , 6 week after the insertion of implant and 12 weeks later (secondary stability)

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

35

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Babalmatham
      • Baghdad, Babalmatham, Iraq, 00964
        • Baghdad University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. medically fit patients ≥ 18 years of age including both genders
  2. alveolar ridges of sufficient vertical and horizontal dimensions
  3. bone density less than 850 Hounsfield units (HU) which corresponds to D3-D5 bone density according to Misch bone classification based on preoperative CBCT findings

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with high bone density (more than 850 HU which corresponds to D1 and D2 according to Misch classification are not suitable for osseodensification.
  2. Patient with severe buccal plate undercut or concavity
  3. Active infection or inflammation in the implant zone
  4. Presence of any uncontrolled systemic diseases.
  5. Any patient need advance treatment such as sinus lifting and bone augmentation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: condensation drilling technique
condensation of bone (osseodensefecation technique)
dental implant placement by using a different drilling techniques
SHAM_COMPARATOR: conventional drilling technique
control group
dental implant placement by using a different drilling techniques

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
primary stability
Time Frame: 0 day (baseline)
Mean implant stability between different comparators following implants insertion by using resonance frequency analysis scaled from 1 to 100
0 day (baseline)
stability at the dip period
Time Frame: 6 week post surgery
Mean implant stability between different comparators following implants insertion by using resonance frequency analysis scaled from 1 to 100
6 week post surgery
secondary stability
Time Frame: 12 week post surgery
Mean implant stability between different comparators following implants insertion by using resonance frequency analysis scaled from 1 to 100
12 week post surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Salwan Y Bede, BDS,FIMBS, University of Bagh

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 5, 2022

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 1, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

January 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 7, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 25, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 25, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • dental implant

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Implant Stability

Clinical Trials on dental implant placement

Subscribe