Stroke Patients', Music Therapist' Engagement and Patients' Finger Movement During Music Therapeutic Interaction

August 29, 2023 updated by: Avi Ohry, Reuth Rehabilitation Hospital

Stroke Patients', Music Therapist' Engagement and Patients' Finger Movement During Music Therapeutic Interaction - A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: Hand functional impairments are common among stroke patients. Rehabilitation therapies increase the possibility of functional recovery. Stroke patients' engagement and effort to work toward achieving rehabilitation goals is of major significance. Neurologically, patient's engagement is being reflected in their brain activity through high levels of sustained attention while performing therapy exercises. Therefore, greater engagement might lead to better sustained attention. Nevertheless, their therapist's engagement, the type of exercise used and the quality of patient-therapist interaction play a significant role in enhancing patients' engagement. Music therapeutic interaction between stroke patient and music therapist, which involves active music making, enhances patient's engagement and improves their affected hand and finger movement.

Objectives: (a) To investigate real-time mechanisms and possible association between: stroke patient's engagement level, music therapist's engagement level and the patient's real-time finger tapping movement of his affected hand. This will be assessed during a Piano Learning exercise versus a Free Improvisation exercise, while the music therapist is musically interacting with the patient on the piano during both exercises. (b) To assess patient's engagement level and real-time finger tapping movement during both exercises when compared to their scores at baseline (when playing alone).

Methods: This study, conducted in Reuth Rehabilitation Hospital, Israel, will include 30 right-handed stroke patients, with right impaired hand, 1-12 months following stroke. This is a two-arm, randomized controlled trial (RCT) in which the participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. In each group participants will perform the same two exercises with the therapist, but the order of the exercises will be reversed within each group. This will be carried out in a single session. Measurement tools will include an EEG marker - The Cognitive Effort Index (CEI) used for real-time measuring patient's and music therapist's engagement's levels, and a MIDI-based assessment of the patient's finger tapping movement during the session.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background:

Hand functional impairments are common among stroke patients. Rehabilitation therapies increase the possibility of functional recovery. Stroke patients' engagement and effort to work toward achieving rehabilitation goals is of major significance. Neurologically, patient's engagement is being reflected in their brain activity through high levels of sustained attention while performing therapy exercises. Therefore, greater engagement might lead to better sustained attention. Nevertheless, their therapist's engagement, the type of exercise used and the quality of patient-therapist interaction play a significant role in enhancing patients' engagement. Music therapeutic interaction between stroke patient and music therapist, which involves active music making, enhances patient's engagement and improves their affected hand and finger movement.

Objectives: (a) To investigate real-time mechanisms and possible association between: stroke patient's engagement level, music therapist's engagement level and the patient's real-time finger tapping movement of his affected hand. This will be assessed during a Piano Learning exercise versus a Free Improvisation exercise, while the music therapist is musically interacting with the patient on the piano during both exercises. (b) To assess patient's engagement level and real-time finger tapping movement during both exercises when compared to their scores at baseline (when playing alone).

Methods:

Participants The study will include post-stroke rehabilitation patients with right hemiparesis (n=30), recruited from Reuth Rehabilitation Hospital 1-12 months following the stroke event. The recruitment process is as follows: The research team will screen patients' records on a daily basis to identify potentially eligible participants. Eligible patients will be invited by the researcher to participate in the study. After obtaining informed consent the researcher will meet them for the intervention.

Study Design and Procedures This is a two-arm, randomized controlled trial (RCT) in which participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. In each group, participants will perform the same two piano exercises with the music therapist, but the order of the exercises will be reversed for each group. In both groups, the musical exercises will be carried out in a single session. Patients' and therapist's engagement levels and patients' finger-tapping movement scores will be measured during both exercises. Patients' engagement level and finger tapping movement scores will also be assessed at baseline (at the beginning of the session). All sessions will be delivered by the same music therapist. During both sessions, the therapist and the patient will each be wearing single channel EEG devices to monitor engagement, via the Cognitive Effort Index (CEI). Additionally, patient's finger tapping movement features of their right affected hand (velocity and regularity) will be collected via Cubase recording software while they perform both musical exercises on a MIDI keyboard with the therapist, as well as at baseline (where they play alone). The patient's MIDI data files will be exported for analysis after the session has been completed. Finally, supplementary video recordings of the patient's hands while performing the musical exercises during both exercises will be synchronized with the CEI and the MIDI and audio recording data. The video and audio data from the video camera will be used by the research team to keep track of the session's content.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Tel Aviv, Israel, 6902732
        • Recruiting
        • Reuth Rehabilitation Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients after unilateral ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke with right-side hemiparesis (left hemisphere stroke)
  2. Men and women age above 18 years old.
  3. Right-handed patients.
  4. Patients with sufficient autonomy in motor functions of the affected upper limb - Manual Muscle Testing (MMT) of the upper limb - Grades between 3-/5 and 4+/5 (inclusive) in at least 3 out of 5 muscle groups of the affected upper limb (shoulder, elbow, forearm, wrist, and fingers).
  5. Patients able to understand, agree, and sign an Informed Consent Form.
  6. Patients with no previous formal piano playing education.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients who do not speak or understand Hebrew at a sufficient level.
  2. Patients with global aphasia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group A: Piano Learning then Free Improvisation
This arm (n=15) will first begin the intervention with a Piano Learning exercise followed by a Free Improvisation exercise.

During all 15 sessions (one session per patient) all patients will be asked to perform two piano playing exercises:

Exercise 1 - Piano Learning exercise - The music therapist will guide the patient to use separate finger movement and to play a brief extract from a familiar song. The therapist guiding techniques may include (but not restricted to) demonstrating to the patient which keys to press (turn- taking), playing the same notes with them in synchronization, or harmonizing the patient's playing.

The patient will then be asked to perform exercise 2. Exercise 2: Free Improvisation exercise -The patient will be instructed to use separate finger movement while playing freely on the piano while the therapist musically. The therapist will use various MT accompaniment techniques.

Both exercises will be performed for the same amount of time (5 minutes each).

Active Comparator: Group B: Free Improvisation then Piano Learning
This arm (n=15) will first begin the intervention with a Free Improvisation exercise followed by a Piano Learning exercise.

During all 15 sessions (one session per patient) all patients will be asked to perform two piano playing exercises:

Exercise 1: Free Improvisation exercise -The patient will be instructed to use separate finger movement while playing freely on the piano while the therapist musically interacts with them. The therapist will use various MT accompaniment techniques.

The patient will then be asked to perform exercise 2. Exercise 2 - Piano Learning exercise - The music therapist will guide the patient to use separate finger movement and to play a brief extract from a familiar song. The therapist guiding techniques may include (but not restricted to) demonstrating to the patient which keys to press (turn- taking), playing the same notes with them in synchronization, or harmonizing the patient's playing.

Both exercises will be performed for the same amount of time (5 minutes each).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Level of Patient Engagement during Baseline based on CEI Measurement
Time Frame: 1 session, 5 minutes
Cognitive Effort Index (CEI) - An easy to use EEG marker for attention which provides a real-time measurement of the patient's and therapist's engagements' levels throughout the session. The CEI data is sampled using a dry electrodes system, with one frontal electrode and one reference electrode on the earlobe. The sampled data is transferred through a wireless connection to a computer, where the data is processed and the CEI marker is generated every 10 seconds and presented by the CEI monitor. The CEI level of engagement appears within the scale of 0-1. During both sessions the patient will not see the CEI monitor.
1 session, 5 minutes
The Level of Patient Engagement during Piano Learning Exercise based on CEI Measurement
Time Frame: 1 session, 5 minutes
Cognitive Effort Index (CEI) - An easy to use EEG marker for attention which provides a real-time measurement of the patient's and therapist's engagements' levels throughout the session. The CEI data is sampled using a dry electrodes system, with one frontal electrode and one reference electrode on the earlobe. The sampled data is transferred through a wireless connection to a computer, where the data is processed and the CEI marker is generated every 10 seconds and presented by the CEI monitor. The CEI level of engagement appears within the scale of 0-1. During both sessions the patient will not see the CEI monitor.
1 session, 5 minutes
The Level of Patient Engagement during Free Improvisation Exercise based on CEI Measurement
Time Frame: 1 session, 5 minutes
Cognitive Effort Index (CEI) - An easy to use EEG marker for attention which provides a real-time measurement of the patient's and therapist's engagements' levels throughout the session. The CEI data is sampled using a dry electrodes system, with one frontal electrode and one reference electrode on the earlobe. The sampled data is transferred through a wireless connection to a computer, where the data is processed and the CEI marker is generated every 10 seconds and presented by the CEI monitor. The CEI level of engagement appears within the scale of 0-1. During both sessions the patient will not see the CEI monitor.
1 session, 5 minutes
Patient's finger tapping movement during baseline
Time Frame: 1 session, 5 minutes
The patient's finger tapping movement data (velocity and regularity) will be collected via Cubase recording software while performing both musical exercises on a MIDI keyboard, as well as at baseline (where they play alone). The patient's MIDI data files will be exported for analysis after sessions have been completed.
1 session, 5 minutes
Patient's finger tapping movement during Piano Learning Exercise
Time Frame: 1 session, 5 minutes
The patient's finger tapping movement data (velocity and regularity) will be collected via Cubase recording software while performing both musical exercises on a MIDI keyboard, as well as at baseline (where they play alone). The patient's MIDI data files will be exported for analysis after sessions have been completed.
1 session, 5 minutes
Patient's finger tapping movement during Free Improvisation Exercise
Time Frame: 1 session, 5 minutes
The patient's finger tapping movement data (velocity and regularity) will be collected via Cubase recording software while performing both musical exercises on a MIDI keyboard, as well as at baseline (where they play alone). The patient's MIDI data files will be exported for analysis after sessions have been completed.
1 session, 5 minutes
The Level of Therapist Engagement during Piano Learning Exercise based on CEI Measurement
Time Frame: 1 session, 5 minutes
As described in Patient Engagement, however, Therapist Engagement will not be measured during baseline.
1 session, 5 minutes
The Level of Therapist Engagement during Free Improvisation Exercise based on CEI Measurement
Time Frame: 1 session, 5 minutes
As described in Patient Engagement, however, Therapist Engagement will not be measured during baseline.
1 session, 5 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Avi Ohry, MD, Reuth Rehabilitation Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 16, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 26, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 31, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hemiparesis;Poststroke/CVA

Clinical Trials on Piano Learning then Free Improvisation

Subscribe