- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04506255
Silicone Taping for the Improvement of Abdominal Donor Site Scars
Silicone Taping for the Improvement of Abdominal Donor Site Scars Following Autologous Breast Reconstruction; A Randomized, Prospective Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Detailed Description
This is a prospective, single center, masked, randomized self-controlled clinical human trial to evaluate the appearance of abdominal scars after autologous free-flap breast reconstruction following post-operative application of silicone tape to improve scar quality. Incisions from 32 adult subjects will act as their own control and will be randomized to have silicone tape applied to one half of their abdominoplasty incision and control treatment using the current standard of care at the investigators institution to the other half, which is no dressing after the initial two week post-op period. A participant size of 32 leaves room in case of participant loss to follow-up, ensuring data will be available for the required sample size of 28 (see statistical analysis section below). A random number sequence generator will be used to randomize which half of the patient's wound will receive the treatment.
Patients will be recruited from plastic surgery clinics at the Queen Elizabeth II (QEII) Health Sciences Centre in Halifax, Nova Scotia. Plastic surgeons will be asked to participate and enroll their breast reconstruction patients, who will undergo a type of abdominoplasty as part of their reconstruction procedure.
Patients will undergo a de novo abdominoplasty procedure as part of a reconstructive breast surgery. Two weeks post-operatively, one side of the patient's abdominoplasty incision will be randomized to receive the silicone tape and the remaining half will be left to heal without any dressing application, which is the current standard at the investigators institution. Each patient will act as their own control. Patients will apply silicone tape on a daily basis, with each piece lasting 24 hours. Tape may be removed for showers and replied after drying. Total length of treatment will be two and a half months.
It is not possible to mask patients, as they will be responsible for ongoing application of the silicone tape. However, the staff surgeon will be masked. Patients will present to their first post-op visit at two weeks. After examination by the staff surgeon, the patient will be seen by the research coordinator who will provide the patient with their randomization treatment assignment. To ensure ongoing masking, at subsequent follow-up visits, patients will remove their dressings one day prior to their appointment with their surgeon. This will ensure no local reaction (i.e. redness after tape removal) that would compromise the masking of staff surgeons.
Patients will then follow up for scar assessment at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months. Unless otherwise required, scar assessments will then be performed at each visit by both the patient and the surgeon using validated objective and subjective scar measures. Patients will also meet with the research coordinator at each follow up visit, to address any questions or concerns about the study and treatment.
The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS & OSAS) system will be used to measure scar appearance. The PSAS and OSAS are tools that the patient uses to assess the scar on color, irregularity, itch, pain, thickness, stiffness and overall opinion, and the surgeon uses to assess pigmentation, pliability, relief, surface area, thickness, vascularity and overall opinion (Appendix A). Of note, only the sum of the components of the OSAS portion of the assessment scale is included to calculate the power and sample size, and will therefore be the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes will include the sum of the components of the PSAS score and the overall scores out of 10 for both the PSAS and OSAS from the patient and masked surgeon.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Jason G Williams, MD
- Phone Number: 902-473-6315
- Email: Jason.Williams@nshealth.ca
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Emily Burke, MD
- Phone Number: 902-694-8080
- Email: Emily.Burke@dal.ca
Study Locations
-
-
Nova Scotia
-
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3H 3A7
- Recruiting
- Halifax Infirmary
-
Contact:
- Jason Williams
- Phone Number: 902-473-6315
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- undergoing de novo abdominoplasty procedures as part of their breast reconstruction
Exclusion Criteria:
- patients with a history of collagen disease, connective tissue disorders, psoriasis or lupus
- patients with scleroderma
- patients with a history of adverse reaction to adhesives or silicone allergy
- patients with signs of dehiscence or infection resulting in modification to the experimental or control dressings
- patients who are unable to care for their incisions
- patients who are current smokers
- patients who are currently on steroids.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Silicone tape
Adult subjects will act as their own control and will be randomized to have silicone tape applied to one half of their abdominoplasty incision.
Patients will apply silicone tape on a daily basis, with each piece lasting 24 hours.
Tape may be removed for showers and replied after drying.
Total length of treatment will be two and a half months.
|
Medical grade tape with silicone adhesive
|
|
No Intervention: No dressing
Control treatment using the current standard of care at our institution to the other half, which is no dressing after the initial two week post-op period, will be used on the other half of the incision for comparison.
Each individual patient will act as their own control.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS & OSAS) System
Time Frame: 6 week follow up, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months.
|
The POSAS is a tool that the patient uses to assess the scar on color, irregularity, itch, pain, thickness, stiffness and overall opinion, and the surgeon uses to assess pigmentation, pliability, relief, surface area, thickness, vascularity and overall opinion.
Each component is scored out of 10, with a lower score indicating a better scar.
Of note, only the sum of the components of the OSAS portion of the assessment scale is included to calculate the power and sample size, and will therefore be the primary outcome.
|
6 week follow up, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months.
|
|
Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS & OSAS) System
Time Frame: 3 month follow up
|
The POSAS is a tool that the patient uses to assess the scar on color, irregularity, itch, pain, thickness, stiffness and overall opinion, and the surgeon uses to assess pigmentation, pliability, relief, surface area, thickness, vascularity and overall opinion.
Each component is scored out of 10, with a lower score indicating a better scar.
Of note, only the sum of the components of the OSAS portion of the assessment scale is included to calculate the power and sample size, and will therefore be the primary outcome.
|
3 month follow up
|
|
Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS & OSAS) System
Time Frame: 6 month follow up
|
The POSAS is a tool that the patient uses to assess the scar on color, irregularity, itch, pain, thickness, stiffness and overall opinion, and the surgeon uses to assess pigmentation, pliability, relief, surface area, thickness, vascularity and overall opinion.
Each component is scored out of 10, with a lower score indicating a better scar.
Of note, only the sum of the components of the OSAS portion of the assessment scale is included to calculate the power and sample size, and will therefore be the primary outcome.
|
6 month follow up
|
|
Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS & OSAS) System
Time Frame: 12 month follow up
|
The POSAS is a tool that the patient uses to assess the scar on color, irregularity, itch, pain, thickness, stiffness and overall opinion, and the surgeon uses to assess pigmentation, pliability, relief, surface area, thickness, vascularity and overall opinion.
Each component is scored out of 10, with a lower score indicating a better scar.
Of note, only the sum of the components of the OSAS portion of the assessment scale is included to calculate the power and sample size, and will therefore be the primary outcome.
|
12 month follow up
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS & OSAS) System
Time Frame: 6 week follow up
|
Secondary outcomes will include the sum of the components of the PSAS score and the overall scores out of 10 for both the PSAS and OSAS from the patient and masked surgeon.
A lower score in each component indicates an improved scar.
|
6 week follow up
|
|
Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS & OSAS) System
Time Frame: 3 month follow up
|
Secondary outcomes will include the sum of the components of the PSAS score and the overall scores out of 10 for both the PSAS and OSAS from the patient and masked surgeon.
A lower score in each component indicates an improved scar.
|
3 month follow up
|
|
Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS & OSAS) System
Time Frame: 6 month follow up
|
Secondary outcomes will include the sum of the components of the PSAS score and the overall scores out of 10 for both the PSAS and OSAS from the patient and masked surgeon.
A lower score in each component indicates an improved scar.
|
6 month follow up
|
|
Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (PSAS & OSAS) System
Time Frame: 12 month follow up
|
Secondary outcomes will include the sum of the components of the PSAS score and the overall scores out of 10 for both the PSAS and OSAS from the patient and masked surgeon.
A lower score in each component indicates an improved scar.
|
12 month follow up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jason G Williams, MD, Nova Scotia Health Authority
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Draaijers LJ, Tempelman FR, Botman YA, Tuinebreijer WE, Middelkoop E, Kreis RW, van Zuijlen PP. The patient and observer scar assessment scale: a reliable and feasible tool for scar evaluation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Jun;113(7):1960-5; discussion 1966-7. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000122207.28773.56.
- van de Kar AL, Corion LU, Smeulders MJ, Draaijers LJ, van der Horst CM, van Zuijlen PP. Reliable and feasible evaluation of linear scars by the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005 Aug;116(2):514-22. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000172982.43599.d6.
- Mustoe TA, Cooter RD, Gold MH, Hobbs FD, Ramelet AA, Shakespeare PG, Stella M, Teot L, Wood FM, Ziegler UE; International Advisory Panel on Scar Management. International clinical recommendations on scar management. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Aug;110(2):560-71. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200208000-00031.
- Truong PT, Lee JC, Soer B, Gaul CA, Olivotto IA. Reliability and validity testing of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in evaluating linear scars after breast cancer surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Feb;119(2):487-94. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000252949.77525.bc.
- O'Brien L, Jones DJ. Silicone gel sheeting for preventing and treating hypertrophic and keloid scars. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 12;2013(9):CD003826. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003826.pub3.
- Fearmonti R, Bond J, Erdmann D, Levinson H. A review of scar scales and scar measuring devices. Eplasty. 2010 Jun 21;10:e43.
- Longaker MT, Rohrich RJ, Greenberg L, Furnas H, Wald R, Bansal V, Seify H, Tran A, Weston J, Korman JM, Chan R, Kaufman D, Dev VR, Mele JA, Januszyk M, Cowley C, McLaughlin P, Beasley B, Gurtner GC. A randomized controlled trial of the embrace advanced scar therapy device to reduce incisional scar formation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Sep;134(3):536-546. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000417.
- Bleasdale B, Finnegan S, Murray K, Kelly S, Percival SL. The Use of Silicone Adhesives for Scar Reduction. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2015 Jul 1;4(7):422-430. doi: 10.1089/wound.2015.0625.
- Hsu KC, Luan CW, Tsai YW. Review of Silicone Gel Sheeting and Silicone Gel for the Prevention of Hypertrophic Scars and Keloids. Wounds. 2017 May;29(5):154-158.
- Sidgwick GP, McGeorge D, Bayat A. A comprehensive evidence-based review on the role of topicals and dressings in the management of skin scarring. Arch Dermatol Res. 2015 Aug;307(6):461-77. doi: 10.1007/s00403-015-1572-0. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
- Meaume S, Le Pillouer-Prost A, Richert B, Roseeuw D, Vadoud J. Management of scars: updated practical guidelines and use of silicones. Eur J Dermatol. 2014 Jul-Aug;24(4):435-43. doi: 10.1684/ejd.2014.2356.
- Finnerty CC, Jeschke MG, Branski LK, Barret JP, Dziewulski P, Herndon DN. Hypertrophic scarring: the greatest unmet challenge after burn injury. Lancet. 2016 Oct 1;388(10052):1427-1436. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31406-4.
- Lorenz HP, Adzick NS. Scarless skin wound repair in the fetus. West J Med. 1993 Sep;159(3):350-5.
- Gurtner GC, Werner S, Barrandon Y, Longaker MT. Wound repair and regeneration. Nature. 2008 May 15;453(7193):314-21. doi: 10.1038/nature07039.
- Mustoe TA. Evolution of silicone therapy and mechanism of action in scar management. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2008 Jan;32(1):82-92. doi: 10.1007/s00266-007-9030-9. Epub 2007 Oct 30.
- Khoo TL, Halim AS, Zakaria Z, Mat Saad AZ, Wu LY, Lau HY. A prospective, randomised, double-blinded trial to study the efficacy of topical tocotrienol in the prevention of hypertrophic scars. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011 Jun;64(6):e137-45. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2010.08.029. Epub 2010 Sep 24.
- Kappel S, Kleinerman R, King TH, Sivamani R, Taylor S, Nguyen U, Eisen DB. Does wound eversion improve cosmetic outcome?: Results of a randomized, split-scar, comparative trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 Apr;72(4):668-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.11.032. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
- Joo JS, Zhuang AR, Tchanque-Fossuo C, Tartar D, Armstrong AW, King TH, Sivamani RK, Eisen DB. Dermal suture only versus layered closure: A randomized, split wound comparative effectiveness trial. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Dec;81(6):1346-1352. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.08.040. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
- Duncan JAL, Bond JS, Mason T, Ludlow A, Cridland P, O'Kane S, Ferguson MWJ. Visual analogue scale scoring and ranking: a suitable and sensitive method for assessing scar quality? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006 Sep 15;118(4):909-918. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000232378.88776.b0.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1025794
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Scar
-
University of California, DavisCompletedLinear Scar | Zigzag ScarUnited States
-
Wake Forest University Health SciencesCompleted
-
Capstone TherapeuticsCompletedScar Prevention | Scar ReductionUnited States
-
Medstar Health Research InstituteActive, not recruitingBurn Scar | Scar | Skin Graft ScarUnited States
-
Iran University of Medical SciencesRecruitingDry Needling | Scar Tissue | Hypertrophic Scar | Hypertrophic Surgical Scar | Hypertrophic Scar of Upper Arm (Disorder)United States, Iran, Islamic Republic of
-
Maternal and Child Health Hospital of FoshanWithdrawn
-
Lumenis Be Ltd.Terminated
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruiting
-
CellinCellsNot yet recruiting
-
University of PittsburghUnited States Department of DefenseTerminatedBurn Scar | Restrictive Scar Contracture | Restrictive Hypertrophic Scar | Burn Scar ContracturesUnited States
Clinical Trials on Silicone tape
-
Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.Unknown
-
Solventum US LLC3MCompleted
-
HARTMANN GROUPCompletedDiabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU) | Venous Leg Ulcer (VLU)Poland
-
Taipei Medical University WanFang HospitalUnknownAnkle Sprains | TapingTaiwan
-
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung UniversityActive, not recruitingFatigue | Strength | Kinesio Taping | Dynamic TapeTaiwan
-
John Paul II University of Applied Sciences in...CompletedMuscle WeaknessPoland
-
University Rovira i VirgiliCompleted
-
Mid Atlantic RetinaCompletedDiabetic Retinopathy | Retinal Detachment | Vitrectomy | Proliferative VitreoretinopathyUnited States
-
Universidade Norte do ParanáCompletedChronic Ankle Instability | Ankle Sprains | Athletes FootBrazil
-
Essity Hygiene and Health ABNot yet recruitingSkin (FLACC Scores of Test Subjects) After Tape RemovalSweden