the Optimal Surveillance Frequency for Stage II/III Gastric Cancer

July 18, 2022 updated by: Chang-Ming Huang, Prof., Fujian Medical University

An International Multi-institution Real-world Study of the Optimal Surveillance Frequency for Stage II/III Gastric Cancer

Due to lacking of evidence on surveillance for gastric cancer (GC), this study aimed to determine the optimal postsurgical surveillance strategy for stage II/III GC patients and compare its cost-effectiveness with traditional surveillance strategies.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Background The development of existing follow-up strategies is mainly based on experts' consensus and researches on recurrence patterns due to the lack of direct evidence and unified standards. On the one hand, it is unreasonable to carry out the same postsurgical surveillance for all stage II/III GC patients. Additionally, In addition to the early detection of recurrence, the optimal follow-up strategy should also balance cost and effectiveness. There were no criteria for the arrangement of follow-up in different guidelines, and the optimal postoperative follow-up strategy for patients with stage II/III GC remains unclear.

Methods Prospectively collected data from stage II/III GC patients (n=1,661) who underwent gastrectomy at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital (FJMUUH) between January 2010 and October 2015. For external validation, two independent cohorts were included, which were composed of 380 stage II/III GC patients who underwent gastrectomy at the Mayo Clinic between July 1991 and July 2012 and 270 stage II/III GC patients at the Qinghai university affiliated hospital (QUAH) between May 2010 and Oct 2014. Random survival forest models were used to predict dynamic recurrence hazards and to construct individual surveillance strategies for stage II/III GC. Cost-effectiveness were assessed by Markov model.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

2311

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Fujian
      • Fuzhou, Fujian, China
        • Department of Gastric Surgery

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

A total of 1,661 stage II/III GC patients who underwent gastrectomy at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital (FJMUUH) between January 2010 and October 2015. For external validation, two independent cohorts were included, which were composed of 380 stage II/III GC patients who underwent gastrectomy at the Mayo Clinic between July 1991 and July 2012 and 270 stage II/III GC patients at the Qinghai university affiliated hospital (QUAH) between May 2010 and Oct 2014.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • (1) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores of 0 (asymptomatic) or 1 (symptomatic but completely ambulatory); (2) pathologically confirmed AGC (pStage II and III, except pT4b); (3) no distant metastasis or invasion of adjacent organs (e.g., pancreas, spleen, liver, and colon) detected intra- or post-operatively; and (4) D2 lymph node dissection of gastric cancer.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • (1) American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade >2; (2) remnant gastric or neuroendocrine cancer; (3) history of neoadjuvant chemotherapy; (4) palliative surgery; and (5) death within 30 days after surgery.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
recurrence rate
Time Frame: 5 years
distant, peritoneal, and local recurrence
5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Delayed-detection months
Time Frame: 5 years
A hypothetical cohort of 1000 GC patients was generated to compare the effectiveness of surveillance among the above-mentioned strategies by calculating the sum of the delayed detection months. Delayed detection months were defined as the duration from the occurrence of failure to the next-nearest follow-up. For instance, if a patient develops distant metastasis in the 3rd month while the next nearest planned visit is in the 5th month, the delayed -detection time for this patient is 2 months. The total number of delayed detection months of our risk-based surveillance schedule and that of the control strategies were simulated and compared.
5 years
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs)
Time Frame: 5 years
incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated by dividing the difference in cost by the difference in QALY.
5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Fujian Medical University

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Changming Huang, MD, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

July 15, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 18, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 20, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 20, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • GCFU-01

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastric Cancer

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Argentina

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe