Radiographic Bone Volume Alteration After Jaw Cyst Enucleation With Different Bone Grafts

Https://Www.Zjuss.cn

For decades, implantology has attracted extensive interest for restoration in patients with the defect of dentition. It has emerged as a very established prosthetic with a 5-year survival rate of 96% . However, defect of dentition resulted from jaw cyst remains an ongoing challenge for subsequent implantation treatment. Since it presents as a larger bone lesion than normal teeth extraction sockets and bone quality and quantity in teeth missing area can significantly impact dental implant failure rates .

Jaw cysts are one of the most common diseases occurring in the oral and maxillofacial area, and often cause destructive bone lesions followed by specific clinical features, such as located pain, swelling and loosen teeth. Over the years, enucleation of jaw bone cysts has been the standard method of management of jaw cysts because its conservational protocol to remove the lesion thoroughly and reserve important structures and functions. Unfortunately, management of the residual bony cavity remains as a huge dilemma whether to filing the defect with additional material. Clot formation in the first instance is the conventional option for residual cavity recovery. Iodoform sponges are traditionally used in cysts as stuffing material for inflammation preventative purpose, however, it cannot help with the following bone formation. Without any bone filling material, researches revealed that spontaneous bone healing index can be from 25.85% to 76% and from 43.46% to 81.03% after 6 and 12 months post-operative respectively. These ranged results indicated that spontaneous bone healing is not efficient enough especially for patients with the extraction of relevant teeth who may process a subsequent surgery for implantation. As an alternative to this, bone graft material in the surgery has gained increasing attention. Autogenous bone, artificial bone substitutes and mix of them are widely applied to achieve higher bone regeneration. Thereby an alternative surgical procedure should be considered for patients at risk of missing teeth because of jaw cysts. Whether bone graft material could make a remarkable improvement of bone regeneration after cyst enucleation and would this actually benefit the follow-up implantation? Answers are urged to be delivered.

Based on the published data, few studies have yielded in the bone healing comparison of spontaneous bone healing and xenograft in jaw cysts. Besides, with the development of medical radiograph, three-dimensional images have played a more important role in the clinic. Whereas, to our knowledge, most researches had adopted two-dimensional radiograph for measurement, such as panoramic radiographs rather than three dimensions.

Therefore, we conducted a prospective study to evaluate the shrinkage rate in cyst patients with different extra xenograft (Bio-Oss and collagen sponge). Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and three-dimensional model reconstruction were recommended for radiographic and digital analyzation. In summary, this study was aimed to evaluate bone volume augmentation after jaw cyst enucleation with different bone substitutes filling by CBCT and to analyze other influence factors for bone formation as well.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Zhejiang
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 310000
        • Recruiting
        • Stomatology Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • jaw bone cyst with the maximum diameter from 1.5cm to 4.0cm;
  • focal teeth were preserved with root canal treatment;
  • no previous surgical treatment of the cyst site;
  • no evidence of acute inflammation;
  • in good physical status and oral health;
  • regular attendance at control visits.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy or lactation;
  • aggregate systemic pathologies such as diabetes, thyroid disorders, bone metabolism diseases, among others;
  • patients taking calcium, bisphosphonates, glucocorticoids, or other drugs that can interfere with bone metabolism;
  • patients with uncontrolled periodontal conditions, endodontic conditions and other oral disorders;
  • heavy smoke (10 cigarettes/day or more).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
NO_INTERVENTION: Control group
Patients in control group will be treated by cyst enucleation.
EXPERIMENTAL: Collagen sponge group
Cystic lesions in collagen sponge group will be filled by collagen sponge.
The bone cavity will be filled with collagen sponge.
EXPERIMENTAL: GBR group
Cystic lesions in GBR group will be filled by deproteinized bovine substitute (DBBM, Bio-Oss®, granulometry 0.25-1 mm; Geistlich Pharma AG) and covered by absorbable collagen membrane (Bio-Gide®, Geistlich Pharma AG).
The bone cavity will be applied with guided bone regeneration with deproteinized bovine substitute (DBBM, Bio-Oss®, granulometry 0.25-1 mm; Geistlich Pharma AG) and absorbable collagen membrane (Bio-Gide®, Geistlich Pharma AG) .
EXPERIMENTAL: CS/GBR group
Cystic lesions in GBR group will be filled by collagen sponge and deproteinized bovine substitute (DBBM, Bio-Oss®, granulometry 0.25-1 mm; Geistlich Pharma AG) and covered by absorbable collagen membrane (Bio-Gide®, Geistlich Pharma AG).
The bone cavity will be applied with guided bone regeneration with collagen sponge and deproteinized bovine substitute (DBBM, Bio-Oss®, granulometry 0.25-1 mm; Geistlich Pharma AG) and absorbable collagen membrane (Bio-Gide®, Geistlich Pharma AG) .

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Shrinkage rate of residual bone cavity
Time Frame: 3 months
(pre-operative cyst volume - 3 / 6 months post-operative defect volume) / pre-operative cyst volume × 100%.
3 months
Shrinkage rate of residual bone cavity
Time Frame: 6 months
(pre-operative cyst volume - 3 / 6 months post-operative defect volume) / pre-operative cyst volume × 100%.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bone density
Time Frame: 3 months
HU value of newly-formed bone
3 months
Bone density
Time Frame: 6 months
HU value of newly-formed bone
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jue Shi, Doctor, Zhejiang University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

June 1, 2022

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

January 30, 2024

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

September 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 21, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

July 28, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 28, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • OMSJC

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe