LITMUS Imaging Study

April 11, 2025 updated by: University of Oxford

Liver Investigation: Testing Marker Utility in Steatohepatitis (LITMUS): Assessment & Validation of Imaging Modality Performance Across the NAFLD Spectrum in a Prospectively Recruited Cohort

The LITMUS Imaging Study is a prospectively recruited, observational study of patients with histologically characterised non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). It aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of imaging biomarkers (ultrasound elastography and magnetic resonance biomarkers) against NAFLD histological scores in a cross-sectional analysis and the natural history of NAFLD in a longitudinal study.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The LITMUS Imaging study is a non-interventional, observational study conducted in parallel to the European NAFLD Registry (NCT04442334), collecting cross-sectional and longitudinal ultrasound elastography and magnetic resonance elastography and imaging data. The LITMUS Imaging study recruits patients with NAFLD who are having a clinically indicated liver biopsy and are already participating in the European NAFLD Registry. Patients in the LITMUS Imaging study have additional imaging assessments at baseline (within 100 days of baseline liver biopsy) and 2 years after baseline (no follow-up biopsy necessary). Imaging assessments include point shear wave elastography, 2D shear wave elastography, MRI scans (Liver Multiscan, deMILI, diffusion weighted imaging, proton density fat fraction, T1 mapping) and MR elastography. Link-anonymised magnetic resonance data are uploaded to a central online portal and analysed centrally by 4 imaging core labs provided by Perspectum (Liver Multiscan), Antaros Medical (MR elastography and DWI), Resoundant (vendor specific PDFF) and University of Seville (deMILI).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

450

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Helsinki, Finland
        • Helsinki University Hospital
      • Angers, France
        • Le Centre de Recherche Clinique (CRC) du CHU d'Angers
      • Paris, France
        • Institut ICAN - Institute of Cardiometabolism And Nutrition Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière
      • Mainz, Germany
        • Universitatsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg Universitat Mainz
      • Würzburg, Germany
        • Universitätsklinikums Würzburg
      • Athens, Greece, 11527
        • Laiko General Hospital of Athens
      • Palermo, Italy
        • Università di Palermo
      • Torino, Italy
        • Department of Medical Sciences University of Torino
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Vall d'Hebron University Hospital
      • Sevilla, Spain
        • Institute of Biomedicine of Sevilla (IBiS), Virgen del Rocío University Hospital
      • Valladolid, Spain
        • HU Clínico de Valladolid
      • Linköping, Sweden
        • Linkoping University Hospital
      • Bern, Switzerland
        • Inselspital, University Hospital
      • Cambridge, United Kingdom
        • Addenbrookes Hospital
      • Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom, NE7 7DN
        • The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
      • Nottingham, United Kingdom
        • Queens Medical Centre
      • Oxford, United Kingdom, OX3 9DU
        • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78201
        • Pinnacle Clinical Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 96 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with known or suspected NAFLD who are undergoing liver biopsy as part of their routine clinical care and are already participating in the European NAFLD Registry

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Recruited to the European NAFLD Registry
  2. Patient had a liver biopsy less than 3 months prior to enrolment into the study or is having a liver biopsy in less than 3 months' time for the assessment of NAFLD.
  3. Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients that do not speak the language in which the patient information is written will be excluded. Due to the nature of the study, being able to read the information about the study or access to a relevant interpreter is a necessary criterion for participant's safety in regards to MR scanning.
  2. Patients judged by the investigator to be unsuitable for inclusion in the study (e.g. where the investigator feels that the participant will not be able to comply with the study procedures)
  3. Any contra-indication to Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) (e.g. ferrous metal implants/fragments, implantable cardiac defibrillator or permanent pacemaker, metal clips following neurosurgery, pregnancy, other condition that would make MR scanning unsafe in the opinion of the scanner operator)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
LITMUS Imaging Study Group
Patients within the European NAFLD Registry who have also consented to participate in the LITMUS Imaging study

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic accuracy of imaging biomarkers for severity of liver fibrosis on histology as reference standard
Time Frame: baseline
sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve
baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnostic accuracy of imaging biomarkers for diagnosis of NASH on histology as reference standard
Time Frame: baseline
sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve
baseline
Diagnostic accuracy of imaging biomarkers for histologically assessed fat and iron deposition as reference standard
Time Frame: baseline
sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve
baseline
To study the natural history of NAFLD and how this may impact prognosis
Time Frame: evaluation of biomarkers at baseline and after 2 years
  1. Longitudinal correlation of change (δ) in MR and US elastography biomarker values with clinical phenotype data*
  2. Survival analysis for the change (δ) in biomarker values
evaluation of biomarkers at baseline and after 2 years
To evaluate reproducibility and observer dependent variability in reporting of liver imaging biomarkers
Time Frame: evaluation of biomarkers within 30 days
Statistical correlation of MR and US elastography data obtained from the same patients acquired or analysed on two time points
evaluation of biomarkers within 30 days
To identify physiological factors that confound the performance of imaging biomarkers for the assessment of fibrosis
Time Frame: baseline
Statistical correlation of MR scans and US elastography imaging biomarkers with liver histology parameters (steatosis, iron deposition, inflammation) and other clinical data (demographics, lab results, patient characteristics)
baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 4, 2019

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 26, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

July 29, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on NAFLD

Subscribe