- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05519319
Safety and Efficacy of PDT vs RFA vs PDT+RFA for the Treatment of Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
February 18, 2023 updated by: Jianfeng Yang, First People's Hospital of Hangzhou
Clinical Effect and Safety of Photodynamic Therapy Versus Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Photodynamic Therapy Plus Radiofrequency Ablation for Unresectable Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
A median survival period of 3 to 6 months is the prognosis for patients with advanced, unresectable EHCC.
For patients with locally advanced, unresectable EHCC, effective management of tumor growth is the only option to increase stent patency and survival time.
In patients with cholangiocarcinoma, photodynamic therapy (PDT) is therapy that has been shown to improve stent patency and overall survival (OS).
Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been demonstrated in numerous studies to prolong the life spans of individuals with malignant biliary obstruction .
In the literature, comparing the clinical efficacy and adverse outcomes of these two endoscopic procedures is rare.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The lower common bile duct and the hepatic hilar area are the origin of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC).
Patients with advanced, unresectable EHCC have a relatively poor prognosis, with a median survival time of 3 to 6 months.
The only way to prolong stent patency and survival for patients with unresectable locally advanced EHCC is by active control of tumor development.
The only treatment that has consistently demonstrated an improvement in stent patency and overall survival (OS) in cholangiocarcinoma patients is photodynamic therapy (PDT).
The popularity of endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP)-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has grown recently in an effort to increase stent patency and survival time for patients with malignant biliary obstruction.RFA for biliary cholangiocarcinoma has demonstrated safety and effectiveness.
Endoscopic RFA has been shown in various studies to prolong stent patency and the survival of patients with malignant biliary obstruction.
The clinical effectiveness and adverse events of these two endoscopic treatments have not been compared in many papers.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
70
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Zhejiang
-
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 310006
- Recruiting
- Hangzhou First People's Hospital
-
Contact:
- Jianfeng Yang
- Phone Number: 13454132186
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed cholangiocarcinoma;
- unresectable cholangiocarcinoma due to local infiltration of major vessels according to computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP), or endoscopic ultrasound(EUS);
- No previous treatment;
- Adequate bone marrow and organ function (white blood cells>4.0×109/L, hemoglobin>90 g/L, and platelets>75×109/L, serum creatinine<2.0 mg/dl);
- A Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score ≥ 50;
- Signed written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Imaging examination (CT, MRCP, EUS) showed distant metastasis of liver, lung and other organs;
- Coexistent with other malignant tumors;
- Pregnant or nursing women;
- Previous gastrointestinal diversion;
- Participation in another study during the month before enrollment in this study;
- Alcohol and/or substance abuse or potentially poor compliance per a doctor's judgment.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Photodynamic therapy(PDT)
The PDT optical fiber was inserted through the dilation catheterand advanced toward the bile duct stenosis point under visual-radiography.
The dilation catheter was then withdrawn to leave the PDT optical fiber directly across the stricture.
Photoactivation was performed at 640 nm using a diode laser at a light dose of 180 J/cm2at power density of300 mW/cm2 and irradiation time of 600 s.
|
PDT will be performed
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Radiofrequency ablation(RFA)
An RFA electrode (Habib EndoHPB, EMcision, HitchinHerts, UK) was advanced along the guide wire into the bile duct and to the biliary stricture under X-ray fluoroscopic guidance.
A 400 kHz RF generator (RITA 1500X, Angio Dynamics, USA) was connected for RFA at 7-10 W for 90 seconds.
|
RFA will be performed
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: RFA+PDT
The PDT optical fiber was inserted through the dilation catheterand advanced toward the bile duct stenosis point under visual-radiography.
The dilation catheter was then withdrawn to leave the PDT optical fiber directly across the stricture.
Photoactivation was performed at 640 nm using a diode laser at a light dose of 180 J/cm2at power density of300 mW/cm2 and irradiation time of 600 s.
After that An RFA electrode (Habib EndoHPB, EMcision, HitchinHerts, UK) was advanced along the guide wire into the bile duct and to the biliary stricture under X-ray fluoroscopic guidance.
A 400 kHz RF generator (RITA 1500X, Angio Dynamics, USA) was connected for RFA at 7-10 W for 90 seconds.
|
RFA and PDT will be performed
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: Three years
|
OS was defined as the time from initial RFA or PDT to death or the end of the study.
|
Three years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Adverse events
Time Frame: Three years
|
Number of patients with adverse events
|
Three years
|
|
Progression-free survival(PFS)
Time Frame: Three years
|
PFS was measured from therapy until the date of disease progression or death
|
Three years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Gao DJ, Yang JF, Ma SR, Wu J, Wang TT, Jin HB, Xia MX, Zhang YC, Shen HZ, Ye X, Zhang XF, Hu B. Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation plus plastic stent placement versus stent placement alone for unresectable extrahepatic biliary cancer: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Jul;94(1):91-100.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.12.016. Epub 2020 Dec 24.
- Chen P, Yang T, Shi P, Shen J, Feng Q, Su J. Benefits and safety of photodynamic therapy in patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A meta-analysis. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2022 Mar;37:102712. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2022.102712. Epub 2022 Jan 5.
- Li Z, Jiang X, Xiao H, Chen S, Zhu W, Lu H, Cao L, Xue P, Li H, Zhang D. Long-term results of ERCP- or PTCS-directed photodynamic therapy for unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Surg Endosc. 2021 Oct;35(10):5655-5664. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08095-1. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
- Yang J, Wang J, Zhou H, Zhou Y, Wang Y, Jin H, Lou Q, Zhang X. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation for unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a randomized trial. Endoscopy. 2018 Aug;50(8):751-760. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-124870. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 1, 2023
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
December 31, 2025
Study Completion (Anticipated)
June 1, 2026
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 24, 2022
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
August 25, 2022
First Posted (Actual)
August 29, 2022
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
February 21, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 18, 2023
Last Verified
February 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2023-01
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
UNDECIDED
IPD Plan Description
Yet not decided
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.