Individualized Prehabilitation for Enhancing Recovery and Surgical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy and Surgery for Soft Tissue Sarcoma

January 14, 2026 updated by: Mayo Clinic

Pre-Operative ERAS® (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery): Randomized Feasibility Trial of Implementing Individualized Prehabilitation for People Undergoing Neo-Adjuvant Radiotherapy and Lower Limb Soft-Tissue Sarcoma Surgery

This clinical trial evaluates whether patients with deep soft tissue sarcomas who receive a tailored prehabilitation exercise regimen during standard radiotherapy and prior to standard of care surgery have better recovery and surgical outcomes than those who do not. Patients undergoing surgery to soft tissue sarcomas are at high risk for post-operative disability, which is associated with high rates of depression and poor health-related quality of life. Prehabilitation is the practice of exercising before surgery to ensure that the patient is in the best possible condition. It allows patients to prepare their bodies for recovery after surgery, which may result in better surgical outcomes, recovery, and quality of life after surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine if a tailored prehabilitation program focusing on functional optimization of spared limb tissue in two groups of patients with localized, lower extremity soft tissue sarcoma, one with prehabilitation and one with equal attention and informational support, improves functional outcome as measure by the Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS).

II. To identify the measures and metrics most responsive to the intervention using the (TESS), Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT), wearable Heel2Toe sensor technology, and daily step count.

III. To estimate recruitment, retention, adherence, and acceptability rates.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To compare changes in quality of life over time as a result of the prehabilitation intervention using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS), European Quality of Life Five Dimension Five Level Scale Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) (Euroqol Group), the Patient Generated Index (PGI).

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM I: Patients perform personalized prehabilitation physical therapy exercises twice a day (BID) 5 days per week for 8 weeks while receiving standard of care radiotherapy and prior to standard of care surgery, attend telemedicine visits with a physical therapist once a week for 9 weeks, and receive educational materials. Patients undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) at week 9.

ARM II: Patients receive educational materials and attend a telemedicine visit with a research assistant once a week for 8 weeks while receiving standard of care radiotherapy prior to standard of care surgery. Patients undergo MRI and CT at week 9.

After completion of study, patients are followed up at weeks 2, 6, and 12.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85259
        • Recruiting
        • Mayo Clinic in Arizona
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Krista A. Goulding, MD, MPH

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically or cytologically-proven deep soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the lower extremity
  • Localized
  • Adults, 18 and older
  • All gender types
  • Subjects must be able to provide appropriate consent or have an appropriate representative available to do so

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Soft tissue sarcomas that are in a superficial location relative to fascia
  • Patients with metastatic disease (distant or nodal)
  • Both and upper and lower extremity involvement

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm I (prehabilitation physical therapy)
Patients perform personalized prehabilitation physical therapy exercises BID 5 days per week for 8 weeks while receiving standard of care radiotherapy and prior to standard of care surgery, attend telemedicine visits with a physical therapist once a week for 9 weeks, and receive educational materials. Patients undergo MRI and CT at week 9.
Ancillary studies
Undergo MRI
Other Names:
  • MRI
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scan
  • Medical Imaging, Magnetic Resonance / Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
  • MR
  • MR Imaging
  • MRI Scan
  • NMR Imaging
  • NMRI
  • Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Undergo CT
Other Names:
  • CT
  • CAT
  • CAT Scan
  • Computed Axial Tomography
  • Computerized Axial Tomography
  • Computerized Tomography
  • CT Scan
  • tomography
Receive educational materials
Other Names:
  • Education for Intervention
  • Intervention by Education
  • Intervention through Education
  • Intervention, Educational
Receive prehabilitation physical therapy
Other Names:
  • PT
  • Physiatric Procedure
  • Physical Medicine Procedure
  • Physical Therapeutics
  • Physical Therapy Procedure
  • Physiotherapy
  • Physiotherapy Procedure
Attend telemedicine visits
Other Names:
  • Telehealth
Active Comparator: Arm II (educational materials)
Patients receive educational materials and attend a telemedicine visit with a research assistant once a week for 8 weeks while receiving standard of care radiotherapy and prior to standard of care surgery. Patients undergo MRI and CT at week 9.
Ancillary studies
Undergo MRI
Other Names:
  • MRI
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scan
  • Medical Imaging, Magnetic Resonance / Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
  • MR
  • MR Imaging
  • MRI Scan
  • NMR Imaging
  • NMRI
  • Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Undergo CT
Other Names:
  • CT
  • CAT
  • CAT Scan
  • Computed Axial Tomography
  • Computerized Axial Tomography
  • Computerized Tomography
  • CT Scan
  • tomography
Receive educational materials
Other Names:
  • Education for Intervention
  • Intervention by Education
  • Intervention through Education
  • Intervention, Educational
Attend telemedicine visits
Other Names:
  • Telehealth

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility as measured by recruitment, retention, adherence, and acceptability
Time Frame: Up to 22 weeks
Univariate descriptive statistics and frequency distributions will be calculated, as appropriate for all variables. Baseline values for demographic, clinical, and outcome variables will be tabulated for the treatment groups.
Up to 22 weeks
Efficacy potential
Time Frame: Up to 22 weeks
Univariate descriptive statistics and frequency distributions will be calculated, as appropriate for all variables. Baseline values for demographic, clinical, and outcome variables will be tabulated for the treatment groups. Between-group effect sizes will be estimated for continuous outcomes.
Up to 22 weeks
Toronto Extremity Salvage Score
Time Frame: At 2, 6, and 12 weeks
This is a self-report measure comprising 30 items (23 for activities of daily living; 7 items for role participation). Will use this measure, completed using observed performance for feasible items and self-report for the remaining items (getting in and out of a car, shopping; driving). Univariate descriptive statistics and frequency distributions will be calculated, as appropriate for all variables. Baseline values for demographic, clinical, and outcome variables will be tabulated for the treatment groups. Between-group effect sizes will be estimated from a mixed model which considers the individual as a cluster with multiple measures per person.
At 2, 6, and 12 weeks
Functional walking capacity
Time Frame: At 2, 6, and 12 weeks
Functional walking capacity is defined as walking capacity needed for everyday activities of daily living such as shopping, traveling to and from work, and walking in the workplace or public buildings. The six minute walk test (6MWT) is the gold standard measure for this. The units are distance in meters covered during the test. There is a standardized mobile application for measuring and data comes minute by minute to assess fatigability. Univariate descriptive statistics and frequency distributions will be calculated, as appropriate for all variables.
At 2, 6, and 12 weeks
Gait quality
Time Frame: Up to 22 weeks
Gait quality will be measured during the 6MWT using a wearable developed by the team, Heel2Toe sensor. The parameters of gait quality will include proportion of steps with as strong a heel strike pre-operatively, as well as distribution of cadence and of angular velocity. Irregular stepping pattern is indicated by lack of heel strike, large variability in cadence, stride length, and angular velocity as indicated by coefficient of variation. Univariate descriptive statistics and frequency distributions will be calculated, as appropriate for all variables.
Up to 22 weeks
Daily step count
Time Frame: Up to 22 weeks
Daily step count for the duration of the study will be obtained using the native accelerometer/gyroscope and pedometers available on both iPhone and android devices. Will summarize this complex data using benchmarks of 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 (000 steps) based on meaningful physical activity targets. Will measure the time to achieve these targets post-surgery. These will be captured for the 9 week prehabilitation period and the post-surgery recovery period. As indicated, will focus on steps taken outside of the house as "in house" steps tend to be of very low cadence. For step counts, time to reach the benchmarks of 1, 3, 5, 7, 9 (000 steps) will be calculated and presented descriptively. Univariate descriptive statistics and frequency distributions will be calculated, as appropriate for all variables.
Up to 22 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Symptom status
Time Frame: Up to 22 weeks
Symptom status will be assessed using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale which assesses 7 symptoms including pain, fatigue, distress, and overall well-being. Univariate descriptive statistics and frequency distributions will be calculated, as appropriate for all variables.
Up to 22 weeks
Global health related quality of life
Time Frame: Up to 22 weeks
Global health related quality of life will be measured using the 5-level EQ-5D version (Euroqol Group) and the Patient Generated Index will be used to assess quality of life. Univariate descriptive statistics and frequency distributions will be calculated, as appropriate for all variables.
Up to 22 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Krista A. Goulding, MD, MPH, Mayo Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 8, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 8, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 8, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 31, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 2, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 16, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 14, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Clinical Trials on Questionnaire Administration

Subscribe