Agility Training and Its Relations in Elderly Adults With and Without MCI

August 27, 2026 updated by: National Taiwan University Hospital

The Effects of an Agility Training and Its Relation to Motor, Cognitive Performance and Fall Risk in Elderly Adults With and Without Mild Cognitive Impairment

The following three-part proposal will focus on the effects of agility training as well as the relationship between agility ability and motor and cognitive function, and risk of falls in elderly adults with or without mild cognitive impairment (MCI).

Part I is a cross-sectional study design that will assess the level of agility in healthy young adults, healthy elderly adults, and elderly adults with MCI to determine the effect of aging and cognition decline on agility and the relations between agility, cognitive, and motor functions. Thirty participants will be screened for eligibility and recruited for each group (90 participants total). After collecting basic data, all participants will undergo cognitive and motor function tests, as well as an agility test. Cognitive function tests include tests of global cognition, working memory, mental set shifting, and selective attention. Motor function tests include tests of single and dual task walking, strength, power, balance, flexibility, and endurance. The agility test contains stop-and-go, change of direction, and spatial orientation components. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) will be used to evaluate the brain activation during the agility test, cognitive tests, and single and dual task walking. Results from all tests will be used to determine the motor, cognitive, and other predictive factors associated with agility performance, and will be used in the design of the training program in Part II and III.

Part II and III are single-blinded randomized controlled trials that will explore the short and long-term effects of a multicomponent training and an agility training protocol on agility, motor, and cognitive function in elderly adults with and without MCI. Seventy-five elderly adults with MCI (Part II) and seventy-five healthy elderly (Part III) will be recruited. After screening for eligibility and collection of demographic data, participants will undergo a pretest assessment. In addition to the motor, cognitive, and agility tests used in Part I, information on history of falls, falls efficacy, and quality of life will be assessed for each participant. Brain activation will be assessed during the agility test, cognitive tests, and single and dual task walking assessments using fNIRS. Participants will be randomly allocated into one of three groups: the control group, the multicomponent training group, or the agility training group (n=25 in each group). Intervention will be executed at a frequency of 45 minutes per session, 2 times a week for 8 weeks. The control group will receive home-based health education guidelines. The multicomponent training group will engage in 3 to 4 exercises each training session comprising the influencing factors of agility, and the agility training group will engage in integrated task-specific training. A post-test will be conducted after the 8-week intervention, and 1-month, 6-month, and 12-month follow-ups will be conducted for elderly adults with MCI. The healthy elderly adults will be assessed after the intervention and at the 1-month follow-up after training.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

83

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan
        • National Taiwan University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Part 1:

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. has a score of ≥ 24 on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)
  2. able to walk independently for more than 30 meters without assistive aids
  3. able to follow orders

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. poorly-controlled or unstable systematic disease
  2. has a history of central nervous system disease
  3. currently taking antidepressants, anti-anxiety, or other psychiatric drugs that may affect blood flow in the brain
  4. subjects with achromatopsia

Part 2:

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. older than 65 years old
  2. score of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) ≥ 24 and score of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) ≤ 26
  3. able to walk independently for more than 30 meters without assistive aids
  4. able to follow orders

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. poorly controlled or unstable systematic disease
  2. has a history of central nervous system disease
  3. currently taking antidepressants, anti-anxiety, or other psychiatric drugs that may affect blood flow in the brain
  4. has other medical conditions for which exercise is contraindicated
  5. subjects with achromatopsia

Part 3:

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. older than 65 years old
  2. score of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) ≥ 24
  3. able to walk independently for more than 30 meters without assistive aids
  4. able to follow orders

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. poorly controlled or unstable systematic disease
  2. has a history of central nervous system disease
  3. currently taking antidepressants, anti-anxiety, or other psychiatric drugs that may affect blood flow in the brain
  4. has other medical conditions for which exercise is contraindicated
  5. subjects with achromatopsia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Healthy adults
Year 1: To assess levels of agility and agility performance in relation to the motor and cognitive abilities of healthy young adults, healthy elderly, and elderly with MCI.
No Intervention: Healthy elderly and mild cognitive impairment elderly
Year 1: To assess levels of agility and agility performance in relation to the motor and cognitive abilities of healthy young adults, healthy elderly, and elderly with MCI.
Active Comparator: Mild cognitive impairment elderly with health education
Year 2: To determine the short and long-term effects of a multicomponent training protocol and an agility training protocol on agility, motor, and cognitive function in elderly with MCI.
Participants in the control group will receive health educational guidelines. Guideline contents include home-based exercise program, nutrition recommendations, and fall prevention education.
Experimental: Mild cognitive impairment elderly with multicomponent training
Year 2: To determine the short and long-term effects of a multicomponent training protocol and an agility training protocol on agility, motor, and cognitive function in elderly with MCI.
Multicomponent exercises will be designed according to the results of Part I of our study. Results of Part I of this study will determine the contributing factors of agility, such as muscle strength, endurance, and cognitive function. A physical therapist will train the participants 3-4 exercises (3-4 factors) in each session. The physical therapist will adjust the difficulty of each exercise according to the participant's ability and condition.
Experimental: Mild cognitive impairment elderly with agility training
Year 2: To determine the short and long-term effects of a multicomponent training protocol and an agility training protocol on agility, motor, and cognitive function in elderly with MCI.
The agility-based task-specific exercises will be conducted in this group and will incorporate stop-and-go, change in direction, change in velocity, acceleration and deceleration training. There are four training configurations with 3 levels of difficulty, which will be manipulated by increasing speed, distance, number of repetitions, number of directions, congruency, and/or complexity of the task, or by decreasing the number and duration of the rest intervals. The physical therapist will adjust the difficulty of each exercise according to the participant's ability and condition.
Active Comparator: Healthy elderly with health education
Year 3: To determine the short and long-term effects of a multicomponent training protocol and an agility training protocol on agility ability, motor, and cognitive function in healthy elderly adults.
Participants in the control group will receive health educational guidelines. Guideline contents include home-based exercise program, nutrition recommendations, and fall prevention education.
Experimental: Healthy elderly with multicomponent training
Year 3: To determine the short and long-term effects of a multicomponent training protocol and an agility training protocol on agility ability, motor, and cognitive function in healthy elderly adults.
Multicomponent exercises will be designed according to the results of Part I of our study. Results of Part I of this study will determine the contributing factors of agility, such as muscle strength, endurance, and cognitive function. A physical therapist will train the participants 3-4 exercises (3-4 factors) in each session. The physical therapist will adjust the difficulty of each exercise according to the participant's ability and condition.
Experimental: Healthy elderly with agility training
Year 3: To determine the short and long-term effects of a multicomponent training protocol and an agility training protocol on agility ability, motor, and cognitive function in healthy elderly adults.
The agility-based task-specific exercises will be conducted in this group and will incorporate stop-and-go, change in direction, change in velocity, acceleration and deceleration training. There are four training configurations with 3 levels of difficulty, which will be manipulated by increasing speed, distance, number of repetitions, number of directions, congruency, and/or complexity of the task, or by decreasing the number and duration of the rest intervals. The physical therapist will adjust the difficulty of each exercise according to the participant's ability and condition.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Agility Challenge for the Elderly (ACE)
Time Frame: Part 1:Baseline; Part 2: Pre-intervention, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 8-month, and 14-month
An agility course developed for a 9m x 18m volleyball court and includes three segments that each aim to test a specific aspect of agility, including stop-and-go, change of direction, and spatial orientation.
Part 1:Baseline; Part 2: Pre-intervention, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 8-month, and 14-month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fall history and fear of falls
Time Frame: Part 1:Baseline; Part 2: Pre-intervention, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 8-month, and 14-month
Fall history will be recorded by the number of fall episodes in the past 6 months and whether it caused injury.
Part 1:Baseline; Part 2: Pre-intervention, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 8-month, and 14-month
Quality of life (QOL)
Time Frame: Part 1:Baseline; Part 2: Pre-intervention, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 8-month, and 14-month
Quality of life (QOL) will be evaluated by Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36).
Part 1:Baseline; Part 2: Pre-intervention, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 8-month, and 14-month
Brain activation
Time Frame: Part 1:Baseline; Part 2: Pre-intervention, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 8-month, and 14-month
A multichannel wearable fNIRS imaging system (NIRSport2, NIRx Medical Technologies LLC, Glen Head, NY, USA) will be used to detect the hemodynamics of brain areas associated with the agility test, cognitive tasks, and single and dual task walking test.
Part 1:Baseline; Part 2: Pre-intervention, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 8-month, and 14-month
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Time Frame: Part 1:Baseline; Part 2: Pre-intervention, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 8-month, and 14-month
MoCA contains 16 items and 11 categories to assess multiple cognitive domains, is a screening instrument for MCI, and its validity has been established in various clinical groups and countries.
Part 1:Baseline; Part 2: Pre-intervention, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 8-month, and 14-month
Mental set shifting
Time Frame: Part 1:Baseline; Part 2: Pre-intervention, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 8-month, and 14-month
The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) will be used to measure participants' ability to shift their cognitive ability in response to the demands of environment.
Part 1:Baseline; Part 2: Pre-intervention, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 8-month, and 14-month
Working memory
Time Frame: Part 1:Baseline; Part 2: Pre-intervention, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 8-month, and 14-month
The backward digit span test (DGS) will be used to measure working memory.
Part 1:Baseline; Part 2: Pre-intervention, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 8-month, and 14-month
Selective attention and inhibition
Time Frame: Part 1:Baseline; Part 2: Pre-intervention, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 8-month, and 14-month
The Stroop Color and Word Test (SCWT) will be used to measure selective attention.
Part 1:Baseline; Part 2: Pre-intervention, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 8-month, and 14-month
Motor Function
Time Frame: Part 1:Baseline; Part 2: Pre-intervention, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 8-month, and 14-month
Walking performance, normal walking, cognitive dual-task walking, muscle strength of bilateral lower limbs, five times sit to stand test, timed up and go, quiet static standing task, and the 360° turning task, flexibility, 6-minute walk test (6WMT).
Part 1:Baseline; Part 2: Pre-intervention, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 8-month, and 14-month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yan Ci Liu, PhD, National Taiwan University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 28, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 13, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

March 13, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 24, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 13, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 31, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 27, 2026

Last Verified

August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe