- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05579067
Comparative Evaluation of Functional Results and Survival Rate of Peroneus Longus Tendon - PLT and Hamstring Tendon - HT Used for Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Comparison of treatment results - survival and reconstruction of autographs and functional results of the knee joint, and functional results of the ankle joint, obtained in the study groups operated using two methods:
A- the use of a long fibular tendon autograft taken from the lower leg of the same limb and used as a graft for ACL reconstruction (anterior cruciate ligament) of the knee joint; B- the use of Hamstring muscle tendon autograft (Semitendonus and slender muscle) taken from the lower leg of the same limb and used as a graft for ACL reconstruction (anterior cruciate ligament) of the knee joint.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Dolnośląsk
-
Wrocław, Dolnośląsk, Poland, 53-110
- Recruiting
- eMKa MED Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18-65 years;
- Surgery for ACL damage to the knee joint;
- Arthroscopic surgery;
- No prior knee surgical interventions;
- No additional pathologies in this anatomical area;
- Patient informed consent to participate in research.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age under 18 or over 65;
- Previous surgical interventions in the examined anatomical area;
- Additional pathologies in this area identified as part of preoperative diagnostics;
- Damage to the second knee joint;
- Failure to comply with the rigor of the same rehabilitation treatment protocol.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Evaluation of functional results and survival rate of peroneus longus tendon used for ACLR.
|
The use of a peroneus longus tendon autograft taken from the lower leg of the same limb and used as a graft to reconstruct the ACL (anterior cruciate ligament) of the knee joint.
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Evaluation of functional results and survival rate of hamstring tendon used for ACL reconstruction.
|
The use of Hamstring muscle tendon autograft (Semitendinus and slender muscle) taken from the lower leg of the same limb and used as a graft to reconstruct the ACL (anterior cruciate ligament) of the knee joint.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Tegner Activity Level Scale (TAS)
Time Frame: 1 day
|
The Tegner Activity Scale (TAS) aims to provide a standardized method in determining the level of activity prior to injury and level of activity post injury that can be documented on a numerical scale. The Tegner activity scale is a one-item score that graded activity based on work and sports activities on a scale of 0 to 10. Zero represents disability because of knee problems and 10 represents national or international level soccer. |
1 day
|
|
Tegner Activity Level Scale (TAS)
Time Frame: 3 months after procedure
|
The Tegner Activity Scale (TAS) aims to provide a standardized method in determining the level of activity prior to injury and level of activity post injury that can be documented on a numerical scale. The Tegner activity scale is a one-item score that graded activity based on work and sports activities on a scale of 0 to 10. Zero represents disability because of knee problems and 10 represents national or international level soccer. |
3 months after procedure
|
|
Tegner Activity Level Scale (TAS)
Time Frame: 6 months after procedure
|
The Tegner Activity Scale (TAS) aims to provide a standardized method in determining the level of activity prior to injury and level of activity post injury that can be documented on a numerical scale. The Tegner activity scale is a one-item score that graded activity based on work and sports activities on a scale of 0 to 10. Zero represents disability because of knee problems and 10 represents national or international level soccer. |
6 months after procedure
|
|
Tegner Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale
Time Frame: 1 day
|
The Tegner Lyshom Knee Scoring Scale is a patient-reported instrument that consists of subscales for pain, instability, locking, swelling, limp, stair climbing, squatting, and the need for support. Scores range from 0 (worse disability) to 100 (less disability). Grading the Tegner Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale:
|
1 day
|
|
Tegner Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale
Time Frame: 3 months after procedure
|
The Tegner Lyshom Knee Scoring Scale is a patient-reported instrument that consists of subscales for pain, instability, locking, swelling, limp, stair climbing, squatting, and the need for support. Scores range from 0 (worse disability) to 100 (less disability). Grading the Tegner Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale:
|
3 months after procedure
|
|
Tegner Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale
Time Frame: 6 months after procedure
|
The Tegner Lyshom Knee Scoring Scale is a patient-reported instrument that consists of subscales for pain, instability, locking, swelling, limp, stair climbing, squatting, and the need for support. Scores range from 0 (worse disability) to 100 (less disability). Grading the Tegner Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale:
|
6 months after procedure
|
|
IKDC SUBJECTIVE KNEE EVALUATION FORM
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Interpreted as a measure of function, such that higher scores represent higher levels of function and lower levels of symptoms.
A score of 100 is interpreted to mean no limitation with sporting activities or daily living and the complete absence of symptoms.
|
1 day
|
|
IKDC SUBJECTIVE KNEE EVALUATION FORM
Time Frame: 3 months after procedure
|
Interpreted as a measure of function, such that higher scores represent higher levels of function and lower levels of symptoms.
A score of 100 is interpreted to mean no limitation with sporting activities or daily living and the complete absence of symptoms.
|
3 months after procedure
|
|
IKDC SUBJECTIVE KNEE EVALUATION FORM
Time Frame: 6 months after procedure
|
Interpreted as a measure of function, such that higher scores represent higher levels of function and lower levels of symptoms.
A score of 100 is interpreted to mean no limitation with sporting activities or daily living and the complete absence of symptoms.
|
6 months after procedure
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time Frame: 1 day
|
BMI is interpreted using standard weight status categories: I : below 18.5 kg/m2 - underweight; II : 18.5 - 24.9 kg/m2 - healthy weight; III : 25.0 - 29.9 kg/m2 - overweight; IV : 30.0 kg/m2 and above - obesity. |
1 day
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time Frame: 3 months after procedure
|
BMI is interpreted using standard weight status categories: I : below 18.5 kg/m2 - underweight; II : 18.5 - 24.9 kg/m2 - healthy weight; III : 25.0 - 29.9 kg/m2 - overweight; IV : 30.0 kg/m2 and above - obesity. |
3 months after procedure
|
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time Frame: 6 months after procedure
|
BMI is interpreted using standard weight status categories: I : below 18.5 kg/m2 - underweight; II : 18.5 - 24.9 kg/m2 - healthy weight; III : 25.0 - 29.9 kg/m2 - overweight; IV : 30.0 kg/m2 and above - obesity. |
6 months after procedure
|
|
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Time Frame: 6 months after procedure
|
1,5 Tesli
|
6 months after procedure
|
|
Ultrasonography (USG)
Time Frame: 6 months after procedure
|
Ultrasound examination on the apparatus with the option of elastometry
|
6 months after procedure
|
|
Biomechanical examination
Time Frame: 3 months after procedure
|
On the Biodex 3 System measuring device
|
3 months after procedure
|
|
Biomechanical examination
Time Frame: 6 months after procedure
|
On the Biodex 3 System measuring device
|
6 months after procedure
|
|
Visual Analogue Score (VAS)
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Visual Analogue Score - subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. 100-mm VAS ratings of:
|
1 day
|
|
Visual Analogue Score (VAS)
Time Frame: 3 months after procedure
|
Visual Analogue Score - subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. 100-mm VAS ratings of:
|
3 months after procedure
|
|
Visual Analogue Score (VAS)
Time Frame: 6 months after procedure
|
Visual Analogue Score - subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. 100-mm VAS ratings of:
|
6 months after procedure
|
|
The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS)
Time Frame: 1 day
|
is a standardized evaluation of the clinical status of the ankle-hindfoot.
It incorporates both subjective and objective information.
Patients report their pain, and physicians assess alignment.
The patient and physician work together to complete the functional portion.each
measure is comprised of nine questions and cover three categories: Pain (40 points), function (50 points) and alignment (10 points).
These are all scored together for a total of 100 points.
Scores range from 0 to 100, with healthy ankles receiving 100 points.
|
1 day
|
|
The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS)
Time Frame: 3 month after procedure
|
is a standardized evaluation of the clinical status of the ankle-hindfoot.
It incorporates both subjective and objective information.
Patients report their pain, and physicians assess alignment.
The patient and physician work together to complete the functional portion.each
measure is comprised of nine questions and cover three categories: Pain (40 points), function (50 points) and alignment (10 points).
These are all scored together for a total of 100 points.
Scores range from 0 to 100, with healthy ankles receiving 100 points.
|
3 month after procedure
|
|
The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS)
Time Frame: 6 month after procedure
|
is a standardized evaluation of the clinical status of the ankle-hindfoot.
It incorporates both subjective and objective information.
Patients report their pain, and physicians assess alignment.
The patient and physician work together to complete the functional portion.each
measure is comprised of nine questions and cover three categories: Pain (40 points), function (50 points) and alignment (10 points).
These are all scored together for a total of 100 points.
Scores range from 0 to 100, with healthy ankles receiving 100 points.
|
6 month after procedure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- KB-84/2022
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
-
Alexander Rofner-MorettiRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction | Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuryAustria
-
Haute Ecole ARC SanteCompletedAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injury | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction RehabilitationSwitzerland
-
Medical University of GrazCompletedAnterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury | Knee Instability | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft FailureAustria
-
Universidad de GranadaRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injury | Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) ReconstructionSpain
-
University of BathVersus ArthritisRecruitingPost-traumatic Osteoarthritis | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear | Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionUnited Kingdom
-
Ankara City Hospital BilkentRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament TearTurkey
-
Sanford HealthActive, not recruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament TearUnited States
-
University of Colorado, DenverChildren's Hospital ColoradoActive, not recruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament TearUnited States
-
eMKa MED Medical CenterWroclaw Medical UniversityRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear | Knee Injuries | Knee Ligament InjuryPoland
-
University of CalgaryWorkers' Compensation Board, AlbertaCompletedAnterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury | Chronic Instability of Knee | Deficiency of Anterior Cruciate LigamentCanada