- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05328544
Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament of the Knee Joint, by the Method of Stabilization of the Screw With a Bioabsorbable Method, With or Without the Use of Autogenous Spongiform Bone Grafts.
Clinical and Comparative Evaluation of the Results of Autograft Healing of the Tendon of the Semitendinus Muscle in the Tibial Canal, After Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament of the Knee Joint, by the Method of Stabilization of the Screw With a Bioabsorbable Method, With or Without the Use of Autogenous Spongiform Bone Grafts.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
- Procedure: ACL reconstruction of the knee joint by arthroscopic technique, with the tibial fixation method using a bioabsorbable screw (Arthrex) with the use of autogenous cancellous bone grafts
- Procedure: ACL reconstruction of the knee joint by arthroscopic technique, with the tibial fixation method using a bioabsorbable screw (Arthrex) without the use of autogenous cancellous bone grafts
Detailed Description
Assessment of the results of autograft healing of the tendon of the semitendinus muscle in the tibial canal, after the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) of the knee joint using the arthroscopic technique, with the method of tibial stabilization with a bioabsorbable screw (Arthrex) with the use of autogenous transplantation of spongy bone, drilling of the tibial canal inserted into the tibial canal prior to insertion of the screw. The detailed objectives are: comparison of the treatment results - healing and reconstruction of the autograft of the semitendinus tendon in the tibial canal of the knee joint, obtained in the study groups using two methods:
A- stabilization of the tibial attachment with a bioabsorbable screw (Arthrex) with simultaneous application to the tibial canal of autogenous cancellous bone grafts taken during the drilling of this canal and
B- stabilization of the tibial insertion with a bioabsorbable screw (Arthrex) without simultaneous application of autogenous cancellous bone grafts to the tibial canal.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Dolnośląsk
-
Wrocław, Dolnośląsk, Poland, 53-110
- Recruiting
- eMKa MED Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18-65 years;
- Surgery for ACL damage to the knee joint;
- Arthroscopic surgery;
- No prior knee surgical interventions;
- No additional pathologies in this anatomical area;
- Informed consent of the patient to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age under 18 or over 65;
- Previous surgical interventions in the examined anatomical area;
- Additional pathologies in this area identified as part of preoperative diagnostics;
- Damage to the second knee joint;
- Failure to comply with the rigor of the same rehabilitation treatment protocol.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: ACL Reconstruction with the use of autogenous spongiform bone grafts
Stabilization of the tibial insertion with a bioabsorbable screw (Arthrex) with simultaneous application to the tibial canal of autogenous cancellous bone grafts taken during the drilling of this canal.
|
Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) of the joint the knee stabilization method, a bioabsorbable screw with the use of an autogenous spongy bone graft taken during drilling of the tibial canal into the tibial canate before inserting the screw.
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: ACL Reconstruction without the use of autogenous spongiform bone grafts
Stabilization of the tibial attachment with a bioabsorbable screw (Arthrex) without simultaneous application of autogenous cancellous bone grafts to the tibial canal.
|
Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) of the joint the knee stabilization method, a bioabsorbable screw without the use of an autogenous spongy bone graft taken during drilling of the tibial canal into the tibial canate before inserting the screw.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Tegner Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale
Time Frame: 1 day
|
The Tegner Lyshom Knee Scoring Scale is a patient-reported instrument that consists of subscales for pain, instability, locking, swelling, limp, stair climbing, squatting, and the need for support. Scores range from 0 (worse disability) to 100 (less disability). Grading the Tegner Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale:
|
1 day
|
Tegner Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale
Time Frame: 3 months after procedure
|
The Tegner Lyshom Knee Scoring Scale is a patient-reported instrument that consists of subscales for pain, instability, locking, swelling, limp, stair climbing, squatting, and the need for support. Scores range from 0 (worse disability) to 100 (less disability). Grading the Tegner Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale:
|
3 months after procedure
|
Tegner Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale
Time Frame: 6 months after procedure
|
The Tegner Lyshom Knee Scoring Scale is a patient-reported instrument that consists of subscales for pain, instability, locking, swelling, limp, stair climbing, squatting, and the need for support. Scores range from 0 (worse disability) to 100 (less disability). Grading the Tegner Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale:
|
6 months after procedure
|
IKDC SUBJECTIVE KNEE EVALUATION FORM
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Interpreted as a measure of function, such that higher scores represent higher levels of function and lower levels of symptoms.
A score of 100 is interpreted to mean no limitation with sporting activities or daily living and the complete absence of symptoms.
|
1 day
|
IKDC SUBJECTIVE KNEE EVALUATION FORM
Time Frame: 3 months after procedure
|
Interpreted as a measure of function, such that higher scores represent higher levels of function and lower levels of symptoms.
A score of 100 is interpreted to mean no limitation with sporting activities or daily living and the complete absence of symptoms.
|
3 months after procedure
|
IKDC SUBJECTIVE KNEE EVALUATION FORM
Time Frame: 6 months after procedure
|
Interpreted as a measure of function, such that higher scores represent higher levels of function and lower levels of symptoms.
A score of 100 is interpreted to mean no limitation with sporting activities or daily living and the complete absence of symptoms.
|
6 months after procedure
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time Frame: 1 day
|
BMI is interpreted using standard weight status categories: I : below 18.5 kg/m2 - underweight; II : 18.5 - 24.9 kg/m2 - healthy weight; III : 25.0 - 29.9 kg/m2 - overweight; IV : 30.0 kg/m2 and above - obesity. |
1 day
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time Frame: 3 months after procedure
|
BMI is interpreted using standard weight status categories: I : below 18.5 kg/m2 - underweight; II : 18.5 - 24.9 kg/m2 - healthy weight; III : 25.0 - 29.9 kg/m2 - overweight; IV : 30.0 kg/m2 and above - obesity. |
3 months after procedure
|
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time Frame: 6 months after procedure
|
BMI is interpreted using standard weight status categories: I : below 18.5 kg/m2 - underweight; II : 18.5 - 24.9 kg/m2 - healthy weight; III : 25.0 - 29.9 kg/m2 - overweight; IV : 30.0 kg/m2 and above - obesity. |
6 months after procedure
|
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Time Frame: 6 months after procedure
|
1,5 Tesli
|
6 months after procedure
|
Ultrasonography (USG)
Time Frame: 6 months after procedure
|
Ultrasound examination on the apparatus with the option of elastometry
|
6 months after procedure
|
Biomechanical examination
Time Frame: 3 months after procedure
|
On the Biodex 3 System measuring device
|
3 months after procedure
|
Biomechanical examination
Time Frame: 6 months after procedure
|
On the Biodex 3 System measuring device
|
6 months after procedure
|
Visual Analogue Score (VAS)
Time Frame: 1 day
|
Visual Analogue Score - subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. 100-mm VAS ratings of:
|
1 day
|
Visual Analogue Score (VAS)
Time Frame: 3 months after procedure
|
Visual Analogue Score - subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. 100-mm VAS ratings of:
|
3 months after procedure
|
Visual Analogue Score (VAS)
Time Frame: 6 months after procedure
|
Visual Analogue Score - subjective measure for acute and chronic pain. 100-mm VAS ratings of:
|
6 months after procedure
|
Tegner Activity Scale (TAS)
Time Frame: 1 day
|
The Tegner Activity Scale (TAS) aims to provide a standardized method in determining the level of activity prior to injury and level of activity post injury that can be documented on a numerical scale. The Tegner activity scale is a one-item score that graded activity based on work and sports activities on a scale of 0 to 10. Zero represents disability because of knee problems and 10 represents national or international level soccer. |
1 day
|
Tegner Activity Scale (TAS)
Time Frame: 3 months after procedure
|
The Tegner Activity Scale (TAS) aims to provide a standardized method in determining the level of activity prior to injury and level of activity post injury that can be documented on a numerical scale. The Tegner activity scale is a one-item score that graded activity based on work and sports activities on a scale of 0 to 10. Zero represents disability because of knee problems and 10 represents national or international level soccer. |
3 months after procedure
|
Tegner Activity Scale (TAS)
Time Frame: 6 months after procedure
|
The Tegner Activity Scale (TAS) aims to provide a standardized method in determining the level of activity prior to injury and level of activity post injury that can be documented on a numerical scale. The Tegner activity scale is a one-item score that graded activity based on work and sports activities on a scale of 0 to 10. Zero represents disability because of knee problems and 10 represents national or international level soccer. |
6 months after procedure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- KB-688/2021
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
-
Bezirkskrankenhaus SchwazNot yet recruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction | Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuryAustria
-
University of BathVersus ArthritisRecruitingPost-traumatic Osteoarthritis | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear | Anterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionUnited Kingdom
-
University of Colorado, DenverChildren's Hospital ColoradoRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament TearUnited States
-
Miach OrthopaedicsActive, not recruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Tear | Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuryUnited States
-
Artromedical Konrad Malinowski ClinicRecruitingAnalysis of Radiological Features of Lateral Femoral Impaction Fracture / Lateral Femoral Notch SignAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament TearPoland
-
Artromedical Konrad Malinowski ClinicRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament TearPoland
-
Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament TearUnited Kingdom
-
Johanna M. HochCompletedAnterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuryUnited States
-
Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo LeonCompletedAnterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuryMexico
-
Karolinska InstitutetRecruitingAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament TearSweden
Clinical Trials on ACL reconstruction of the knee joint by arthroscopic technique, with the tibial fixation method using a bioabsorbable screw (Arthrex) with the use of autogenous cancellous bone grafts
-
eMKa MED Medical CenterWroclaw Medical UniversityRecruitingKnee Injuries | Cartilage Injury | Cartilage DamagePoland