Rebooting Infant Pain Assessment: Using Machine Learning to Exponentially Improve Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Practice (BabyAI)

October 11, 2022 updated by: RRiddell, York University
A multi-national multidisciplinary team will be working collaboratively to build a machine learning algorithm to distinguish between preterm infant distress states in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Unmanaged pain in hospitalized infants has serious long-term complications. Our international team of knowledge users and health/natural science/engineering/social science researchers have come together to build a machine learning algorithm that will learn how to discriminate invasive and non-invasive distress. A sample of 400 preterm infants (300 from Mount Sinai Hospital and 100 from University College London Hospital [UCLH]) and their mothers will be followed during a routine painful procedure (heel lance). Pain indicators (facial grimacing [behavioural indicators], heart rate, oxygen saturation levels [physiologic indicators], brain electrical activity) during the painful procedure will be used to train the algorithm to discriminate between different types of distress (pain-related and non-pain related).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

400

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Rebecca Pillai Riddell, PhD
  • Phone Number: 416736200
  • Email: rpr@yorku.ca

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 months to 7 months (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Preterm infants

Description

  • QUALITATIVE INTERVIEWS
  • Inclusion Criteria:
  • parents of a child currently in the NICU or
  • health professionals currently working in the NICU.
  • Exclusion Criteria:
  • Participants who cannot communicate fluently in English
  • QUANTITITATIVE DATA CAPTURE (video, eeg, ecg, SPo2)
  • Inclusion Criteria:
  • Infants born between 28 0/7 weeks 32 6/7 weeks gestational age
  • Infants who are within 6 weeks postnatal age
  • Infants who are undergoing a routine heel lance
  • Exclusion Criteria:
  • Infants with congenital malformations
  • Infants receiving analgesics or sedatives at the time of study (aside from sucrose),
  • Infants with history of perinatal hypoxia/ischemia at the time of study.
  • Infants with diaper rash or excoriated buttocks

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Infants Hospitalized in the NICU
Infants born between 28 0/7 weeks 32 6/7 weeks gestational age, who are within 6 weeks postnatal age, and their caregiver and/or health professional will be recruited for qualitative interview.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Behavioural Correlate of Distress
Time Frame: NFCS-P coded in 1-5 minute epochs, over 2 hour surrounding painful procedure (time locked to heel lance; approximately 1 hour before to 1 hour after heel lance)
To be analyzed using machine learning via bedside videography: Facial Grimacing using Neonatal Facial Coding System(NFCS-P subset; Bucsea et al., in preparation)
NFCS-P coded in 1-5 minute epochs, over 2 hour surrounding painful procedure (time locked to heel lance; approximately 1 hour before to 1 hour after heel lance)
Cortical Correlate of Distress
Time Frame: For 2 hours surrounding Painful procedure (time locked to heel lance; approximately 1 hour before to 1 hour after heel lance)
To be analyzed using machine learning via bedside monitoring: Continuous EEG data capture
For 2 hours surrounding Painful procedure (time locked to heel lance; approximately 1 hour before to 1 hour after heel lance)
Cardiac Correlates of Distress
Time Frame: Over 2 hours surrounding Painful procedure (time locked to heel lance)
To be analyzed using machine learning via bedside monitoring: Heart Rate, Heart Rate Variability
Over 2 hours surrounding Painful procedure (time locked to heel lance)
Oxygen Saturation Correlate of Distress
Time Frame: Over 2 hours surrounding Painful procedure (time locked to heel lance; approximately 1 hour before to 1 hour after heel lance)
To be analyzed using machine learning via bedside monitoring: amount of oxygen-carrying hemoglobin in the blood relative to the amount of hemoglobin not carrying oxygen
Over 2 hours surrounding Painful procedure (time locked to heel lance; approximately 1 hour before to 1 hour after heel lance)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Semi-Structured Interview
Time Frame: These interviews are occurring at the beginning of the study and will be qualitatively analyzed. They are not linked to infants whose data we are collecting primary outcomes.
Health Professionals and Caregivers will be asked about their thoughts on using AI for infant pain assessment
These interviews are occurring at the beginning of the study and will be qualitatively analyzed. They are not linked to infants whose data we are collecting primary outcomes.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rebecca Pillai Riddell, PhD, York University/Mount Sinai Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2020

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 24, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

October 13, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

October 13, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 19-0252-A

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Pain

Subscribe