Effect of Gut Microbiome Intervention on Aging Via Oral FMT (STEP-aging)

December 24, 2025 updated by: Jun Cai, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital

Effect of Fecal Microbiota Transplantation on Aging and the Underlying Mechanism of Gut Microbiome Restoration: a Randomized Clinical Trial

A severe public health issue facing global population is aging. Increasing preclinical and clinical data indicate the contribution of gut microbiome on aging and aging-related diseases such as cardiovascular disease, Alzheimer Disease, and diabetes. Interventions on microbiota are developed including prebiotics, probiotics, and fecal microbial transplantation (FMT). FMT via oral capsules also advances in recent with limited safety concerns compared with invasive routes. A hypothesis is thus raised that gut microbiome intervention via oral FMT can be a potential safe approach to encourage healthy aging, with multiple aspects evaluated for clinical phenotype of frailty, anthropometric measurement, cognitive function, cardiovascular aging, physical function, living activity, hippocampal volume, telomere length, cognitive biomarkers, inflammatory biomarkers, altered microbial composition and metabolites.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Objective: To explore the effect, safety and underlying mechanisms of gut microbiome intervention via FMT on aging. Study Design: A multi-center, randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled pilot study. Data quality control and statistical analysis: The investigators have invited professional statistic analysts to assist analyzing data and a third party to supervise data quality. Ethics: The Ethics Committee of Fuwai Hospital approved this study. Informed consents before patient enrollment are required.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

210

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
        • Recruiting
        • Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University
        • Contact:
          • Yifan Fan, MD
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
        • Recruiting
        • Beijing Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Ni Zhang, MD
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
        • Recruiting
        • Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Guogang Xu, MD
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
        • Recruiting
        • Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University
        • Contact:
          • Jing Li, MD
    • Shanghai Municipality
      • Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China
        • Recruiting
        • Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University
        • Contact:
          • Kailei Shi, MD
    • Zhejiang
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
        • Recruiting
        • Zhejiang Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Wei Yu, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

66 years to 81 years (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 70-85 years.
  2. Patients with informed consent after thorough explanation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants of other clinical trials;
  2. Antibiotics or probiotics usage within last 4 weeks;
  3. Severe hepatic or renal diseases ((ALT >3 times the upper limit of normal value, or end stage renal disease on dialysis or eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2, or serum creatinine >2.5 mg/dl [>221 μmol/L]);
  4. History of large atherosclerotic cerebral infarction or hemorrhagic stroke (not including lacunar infarction and transient ischemic attack [TIA]);
  5. Hospitalization for myocardial infarction within last 6 months; Coronary revascularization (PCI or CABG) within last 12 months; Planned for PCI or CABG in the next 6 months;
  6. NYHA class III-IV heart failure; Hospitalization for chronic heart failure exacerbation within last 6 months;
  7. Severe valvular diseases; Potential for surgery or percutaneous valve replacement within the study period;
  8. Dilated cardiomyopathy; Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; Rheumatic heart disease; Congenital heart disease;
  9. History of dementia, Parkinson's disease, intracranial infection, intracranial tumor, schizophrenia, anxiety, depression;
  10. History of neurosurgical operation;
  11. History of gastrointestinal tumor, gastrointestinal surgery, inflammatory bowel disease; Hospitalization for peptic ulcer disease exacerbation within last 6 months or anticipated hospitalization for peptic ulcer disease the next 6 months;
  12. Hypertension with uncontrolled blood pressure ≥180/110mmHg;
  13. Diabetes Mellitus with uncontrolled fasting glucose level ≥200mg/dl (11.1mmol/L), or HbA1C>8%;
  14. Addicted to alcohol; Use of medication influencing cognitive function(i.e., antihistamine, antipsychotic);
  15. General anesthesia within last 3 months;
  16. Other severe diseases influencing the entry or survival of participants, such as malignant tumor or acquired immune deficiency syndrome, life expectancy <1 year;
  17. Impaired verbal communication who are incapable of providing their own informed consent, or incapable of self-care;
  18. Special diet influencing microbiota (i.e. vegetarian);
  19. Other conditions inappropriate for recruitment according to the investigators.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: FMT capsules
FMT capsules containing extensively screened donor stool. FMT capsules will be orally taken on week 0, week 4, week 8, week 12, week 24, week 28, week 32, week 36, week 48, week 52, week 56, week 60, week 72, week 76, week 80, week 84.
FMT capsules containing extensively screened donor stool.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo capsules
Placebo capsules that do not contain donor stool or any active drug. Placebo capsules will be orally taken on week 0, week 4, week 8, week 12, week 24, week 28, week 32, week 36, week 48, week 52, week 56, week 60, week 72, week 76, week 80, week 84.
Placebo capsules that do not contain donor stool or any active drug.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of participants with reduced frailty score at week 96 follow-up
Time Frame: week 96
Frailty score via CHS criteria of five frailty components, compared with baseline
week 96

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of participants with reduced frailty score at week 12 follow-up
Time Frame: week 12
Frailty score via CHS criteria of five frailty components, compared with baseline
week 12
Proportion of participants with reduced frailty score at week 24 follow-up
Time Frame: week 24
Frailty score via CHS criteria of five frailty components, compared with baseline
week 24
Proportion of participants with reduced frailty score at week 48 follow-up
Time Frame: week 48
Frailty score via CHS criteria of five frailty components, compared with baseline
week 48
Proportion of participants with reduced frailty score at week 72 follow-up
Time Frame: week 72
Frailty score via CHS criteria of five frailty components, compared with baseline
week 72
Change from baseline in Frailty score
Time Frame: week 12, week 24, week 48, week 72, week 96, compared with baseline
Frailty score via CHS criteria of five frailty components, ranging from 0 to 5, with higher score indicating worse outcome
week 12, week 24, week 48, week 72, week 96, compared with baseline
Change from baseline in telomere length
Time Frame: week 48, week 96
Change from baseline in telomere length
week 48, week 96
Change from baseline in Cognitive assessment via Mini Mental State Examination(MMSE)
Time Frame: week 24, week 48, week 72, week 96, compared with baseline
MMSE (Mini Mental State Examination) ranging from 0 to 30, with lower score indicating worse outcome
week 24, week 48, week 72, week 96, compared with baseline
Change from baseline in Cognitive assessment via Montreal Cognitive Assessment(MoCA)
Time Frame: week 24, week 48, week 72, week 96, compared with baseline
MoCA (Montreal Cognitive Assessment) ranging from 0 to 30, with lower score indicating worse outcome
week 24, week 48, week 72, week 96, compared with baseline
Change from baseline in Hippocampal volumes
Time Frame: week 48, week 96
Hippocampal volumes evaluated by Magnet Resonance Imaging
week 48, week 96
Change from baseline in cognitive biomarkers
Time Frame: week 12, week 24, week 48, week 72, week 96
plasma levels of cognitive biomarkers for BDNF、tau、Aβ-40、Aβ42
week 12, week 24, week 48, week 72, week 96
Change from baseline in inflammatory biomarkers
Time Frame: week 12, week 24, week 48, week 72, week 96
plasma levels of inflammatory biomarkers for hs-C-reactive protein (hs-CRP)、 interleukin 6(IL-6)、interleukin 1 β(IL-1 β) 、interleukin10 (IL-10)、tumor necrosis factor α(TNF-α)
week 12, week 24, week 48, week 72, week 96
Change from baseline in Intestinal Microbiota Composition Pre- and Post-intervention via Metagenomic Analysis
Time Frame: week 12, week 24, week 48, week 72, week 96

Change in Intestinal Microbiota Composition Pre- and Post-intervention (FMT or Placebo) via Metagenomic Analysis, stratified by:

  1. Randomisation
  2. Change in Office SBP
week 12, week 24, week 48, week 72, week 96
Change from baseline in Intestinal Microbiota Function assessed by KEGG Orthology (KO) Pre- and Post-intervention via Metagenomic Analysis
Time Frame: week 12, week 24, week 48, week 72, week 96

Change in Intestinal Microbiota Function assessed by KEGG Orthology (KO) Pre- and Post-intervention (FMT or Placebo) via Metagenomic Analysis, stratified by:

  1. Randomisation
  2. Change in Office SBP
week 12, week 24, week 48, week 72, week 96
Change from baseline in Plasma Metabolite Composition Pre- and Post-intervention via Metabolomic Analysis
Time Frame: week 12, week 24, week 48, week 72, week 96
Change in Plasma Metabolite Composition Pre-and Post-intervention (FMT or Placebo) via Metabolomic Analysis
week 12, week 24, week 48, week 72, week 96
Change from baseline in Ankle-Brachial Blood Pressure Index(ABI)
Time Frame: week 48, week 96
Change for ABI as an objective measurement of arterial insufficiency based on the ratio of ankle systolic pressure to brachial systolic pressure.
week 48, week 96
Change from baseline in Pulse wave velocity(PWV)
Time Frame: week 48, week 96
Change for Pulse wave velocity(PWV)
week 48, week 96
Number of Participants with Adverse Events (AEs) as a Measure of Safety
Time Frame: week 12, week 24, week 48, week 72, week 96
Number of Participants with Adverse Events (AEs) as a Measure of Safety
week 12, week 24, week 48, week 72, week 96
Change from baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI)
Time Frame: week 4, week 8, week 12, week 24, week 48, week 72, week 96
Change for Body Mass Index
week 4, week 8, week 12, week 24, week 48, week 72, week 96
Change from baseline in office SBP
Time Frame: week 4, week 8, week 12, week 24, week 48, week 72, week 96
change for office systolic blood pressure(SBP)
week 4, week 8, week 12, week 24, week 48, week 72, week 96
Change from baseline in office DBP
Time Frame: week 4, week 8, week 12, week 24, week 48, week 72, week 96
change for office diastolic blood pressure(DBP)
week 4, week 8, week 12, week 24, week 48, week 72, week 96
Change from baseline in Blood Lipid Level
Time Frame: week 12, week 24, week 48, week 96
Change for Blood Lipid Level (Total Cholesterol, Total Triglyceride, Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol)
week 12, week 24, week 48, week 96
Change from baseline in blood fasting glucose level
Time Frame: week 12, week 24, week 48, week 96
Change for blood fasting glucose level
week 12, week 24, week 48, week 96
Change from baseline in blood HbA1c level
Time Frame: week 12, week 24, week 48, week 96
Change for blood glycosylated hemoglobin, type A1C (HbA1c) level
week 12, week 24, week 48, week 96
Change from baseline in physical function assessment via 6MWT
Time Frame: week 12, week 24, week 48, week 72, week 96
6-minute walking test(6MWT)
week 12, week 24, week 48, week 72, week 96
Change from baseline in daily function assessment via Activity of Daily Living (ADL)
Time Frame: week 12, week 24, week 48, week 72, week 96
Activity of Daily Living (ADL) ranging from 0 to 100, with lower score indicating worse outcome
week 12, week 24, week 48, week 72, week 96

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jun Cai, MD,PhD, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Institute of Heart, Lung and Blood Vessel Diseases, Chinese Institutes for Medical Research

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 24, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 20, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 28, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 31, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 24, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The collected data, study protocol, and SAP are planned to be shared after the study ends 3 years later (anticipated)

IPD Sharing Time Frame

after the study ends 3 years later (anticipated)

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access to these deidentified data will be required for written permission from the responsible investigation center and only for qualified researchers.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Frailty

Clinical Trials on FMT capsules

Subscribe