Validity and Reliability of the Sitting Assessment Scale in Cerebral Palsy

February 8, 2024 updated by: Demet GÖZAÇAN KARABULUT, Gaziantep Islam Science and Technology University
The Sitting Assessment Scale is a valid and reliable scale that evaluates sitting balance in Cerebral Palsy (CP). The validity and reliability study of the scale has been done, but it has not been adapted to Turkish language. The aim of this study is to adapt the Sitting Evaluation Scale, which evaluates sitting balance in Cerebral Palsy, into Turkish and to examine the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the scale.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Cerebral Palsy will be participate the study between the ages of 2 and 18 years. Children's classified with GMFCS and MACS.

Evaluation will be applied to the volunteer participants after the translation steps of the Sitting Evaluation Assessment are completed. The validity of the scale will be examined in terms of construct validity and content validity. All evaluations will be performed in the clinic with the specialist physiotherapist.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

34

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Gaziantep, Turkey, 27010
        • Gaziantep

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Cerebral Palsy will be participate the study between the ages of 2 and 18 years.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of Cerebral Palsy voluntary participation,
  • Age between 2-18 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not voluntary to participate in the research,
  • Botox in the last 6 months,
  • Hip or spine surgeries in the last 6 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS)
Time Frame: At Baseline
Assessing functional level and motor functions of children with CP.
At Baseline
Manuel ability classification system (MACS)
Time Frame: At Baseline
This is a classification system based on the grasping and releasing objects in daily life, and how they use their hands while holding objects. It is classify the hand skills of children with CP between the ages of 4-18.Children with CP are classified in five levels with MACS. The higher level indicates worse hand function.
At Baseline
Gross Motor Function Measure-88
Time Frame: At Baseline
It is used to show gross motor functions and changes in these functions. It consists of five main sections. Each section can be used by calculating separately within itself. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with a high score indicating better function.
At Baseline
Trunk Control Measurement Scale
Time Frame: At Baseline
This scale consists of two main parts as dynamic and static sitting balance. The scale consists of 15 questions. The scoring of the items is 0, 1, 2 or 3. The total score ranges from 0 to 58, with a high score indicating better trunk control.
At Baseline
Sitting Assessment Scale
Time Frame: At Baseline and 2 weeks after the baseline
The Sitting Assessment Scale is a standard observation tool designed for the assessment of sitting in children with CP. The scale consists of five items evaluating head, trunk and foot control and arm and hand functions.The lowest score that can be obtained from the scale is 5 and the highest score is 20. It can be stated that higher scores better functions.
At Baseline and 2 weeks after the baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Demet Gözaçan Karabulut, Gaziantep Islam Science and Technology University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 15, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

September 5, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 4, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

November 17, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy

3
Subscribe