Study of M5049 in DM and PM Participants (NEPTUNIA)

A Phase IIa, Randomized, Parallel, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Enpatoran in Dermatomyositis and Polymyositis Participants Receiving Standard of Care (NEPTUNIA)

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of orally administered M5049 in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, specifically dermatomyositis (DM) and polymyositis (PM) participants for 24 weeks.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Prague, Czechia
        • Institute of Rheumatology - Rheumatology
      • Athens, Greece
        • Hippokration Hospital - 2nd Department of Medicine and Laboratory
      • Athens, Greece
        • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (Egnitio Hospital)
      • Larissa, Greece
        • University General Hospital of Larissa
      • Catania, Italy
        • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico G. Rodolico-San Marco Di Catania (Vittorio Emanuele) - Reumatologia
      • Catania, Italy
        • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Policlinico G. Rodolico-San Marco Di Catania
      • Florence, Italy
        • Azienda USL Toscana Centro
      • Reggio Emilia, Italy
        • Arcispedale S. Maria nuova
      • Rome, Italy
        • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli-IRCCS, UCSC - Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche
      • Warszawa, Poland
        • Instytut Reumatologii im. Eleonory Reicher - Department of Connective Tissue Diseases
      • A Coruna, Spain
        • CHUAC - Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña - Rheumatology
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Hospital Vall d'Hebron
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal, Madrid - Rheumatology Department
      • Doncaster, United Kingdom
        • Doncaster Royal Infirmary (3466)
      • London, United Kingdom
        • Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust
      • London, United Kingdom
        • University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust- Neuromuscular Diseases
      • Salford, United Kingdom
        • Salford Royal Hospital, Barnes Clinical Research Facility
      • Wolverhampton, United Kingdom
        • Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals (6493)
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85028
        • Neuromuscular Research Center
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85251
        • HonorHealth Research Institute - Bob Bove Neuroscience Institute-Neuroscience Research
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85259
        • Mayo Clinic Scottsdale (6365)
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • Barbara Davis Center
    • Florida
      • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32819
        • HMD Research LLC
      • Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States, 33026
        • Bolanos Clinical Research
    • Georgia
      • Augusta, Georgia, United States, 30912
        • Augusta University-Rheumatology
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21224
        • Johns Hopkins University - Department of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55455
        • University of Minnesota-Dermatology
    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 66103
        • University of Kansas Medical Center-Neuromuscular
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • University of Pittsburgh
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78759
        • Austin Neuromuscular Center
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Nerve and Muscle Center of Texas-Clinical research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of probable or definite DM or PM as per 2017 ACR/EULAR classification criteria, with positive autoantibody status. Anti-synthetase syndrome (ASyS) participants that meet classification criteria are allowed
  • Active disease on standard of care (SoC), must meet 1 of the criteria within 6 months prior to Screening: Pathological evidence of active myositis in muscle biopsy; Evidence of active myositis by Electromyography (EMG); Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with evidence of active myositis; or any muscle enzyme greater than or equal to (>=) 4 × upper limit of normal (ULN) at time of Screening; Active PM/DM skin rash as per cutaneous dermatomyositis area and severity index-A (CDASI-A) >= 7 at time of Screening
  • Minimum disease severity defined by: moderate to severe myopathy with manual muscle testing-8 (MMT-8) >= 80 and less than or equal to (<=) 142 AND at least 2 of the following core set measures (CSM) abnormalities: Patient Global Activity (PtGA) >= 2 centimeters (cm); Physician Global Activity (PGA) derived from myositis disease activity assessment tool (MDAAT) >= 2 cm; Extramuscular Activity Assessment derived from MDAAT >2 cm; At least 1 muscle enzyme > 1.5 times ULN; health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI) >= 0.25
  • Stable doses of oral corticosteroids (CS) and/or maximum of 1 non-corticosteroid immunosuppressive/immunomodulatory medications (methotrexate, 6 mercaptopurine, sulfasalazine, mycophenolate mofetil or sodium, azathioprine, leflunomide, cyclosporine, oral tacrolimus) for DM or PM
  • Participants have a body mass index (BMI) lower or Equal to 40.0 kilograms per square meter (kg/m^2)
  • Other protocol defined inclusion criteria could apply

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Primary diagnosis of inclusion body myositis (IBM), malignancy-associated myositis (defined as diagnosis of myositis within 3 years of cancer), immune mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) with a biopsy characterized as necrotizing biopsy or IMNM with positive anti-signal recognition particle antibody (SRP) or anti 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR) auto antibodies. Participants with anti-transcription intermediary factor 1 (TIF1) gamma antibody or newly diagnosed (within 1 year) anti MDAT5 antibody should have had adequate screening for cancer within 12 months of Day 1. Adequate screening of cancer is defined as up-to-date age and gender appropriate screening as per national guidelines
  • Primary diagnosis of juvenile DM, or adult participants previously diagnosed with juvenile DM
  • Any other active concurrent connective tissue disease associated with inflammatory myopathy in the Investigator's opinion. Eligibility of participants with diagnosis of concurrent connective tissue disease(s) will be reviewed and approved by an idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) expert committee
  • Severe interstitial lung disease defined as supplemental oxygen required at rest, or forced vital capacity (FVC) of <60 percent (%) predicted. Participants within 1 year of PM/DM diagnosis and anti-MDA5 antibody, should have been evaluated for interstitial lung disease (ILD) with high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) Chest
  • Any uncontrolled disease (for example [e.g.], severe respiratory, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, neurological, psychiatric, hematological, metabolic [including thyroiditis with increased/decreased thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH)], renal [Estimated glomerular filtration rate < 40 milliliter per minute/1.73 m^2 as calculated by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation by the central laboratory], hepatic, endocrine/reproductive organ disease) other than DM/PM, that in the Investigator's or Sponsor/designee's opinion constitutes an inappropriate risk or contraindication for participation in the study or that could interfere with the study objectives, conduct, or evaluation
  • Other protocol defined exclusion criteria could apply

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Double-blind Placebo Controlled (DBPC) Period: M5049 high dose
Participants will receive film-coated tablets of M5049 at a high dose orally, twice daily up to 24 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Enpatoran
Placebo Comparator: DBPC Period: Placebo
Participants will receive placebo matched to M5049 orally, twice daily up to 24 weeks.
Experimental: Open Label Extension (OLE) Period: M5049 high dose
Participants will receive film-coated tablets of M5049 at a high dose orally, twice daily up to 24 weeks.
Other Names:
  • Enpatoran

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
DBPC Period: American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) Total Improvement Score (TIS) at Week 24
Time Frame: at Week 24
at Week 24
DBPC Period: Number of Participants with Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)
Time Frame: up to Week 26
up to Week 26
DBPC Period: Number of Participants with Clinically Significant Changes from Baseline in Laboratory Parameters, Vital Signs and 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Measurements
Time Frame: up to Week 26
up to Week 26

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
DBPC Period: Number of Participants with American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) Total Improvement Score (TIS) Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 20, >= 40 and >= 60
Time Frame: Week 16 and Week 24
Week 16 and Week 24
DBPC Period: Total Improvement Score (TIS)
Time Frame: Week 4 up to Week 20
Week 4 up to Week 20
DBPC Period: Mean Score for Core Set Measures (CSM) from Week 4 up to Week 24.
Time Frame: Week 4 up to Week 24
Week 4 up to Week 24
DBPC Period: Percent Change from Baseline in Most Abnormal Muscle-associated Enzyme at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
DBPC Period: Absolute Change from Baseline in the Core Set Measures (CSM) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24'
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
DBPC Period: Percent Change from Baseline in Core Set Measures (CSM) at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24'
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
DBPC Period: Number of Participants with International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies (IMACS) Response
Time Frame: Week 16 and Week 24
Week 16 and Week 24
DBPC Period: Change from Baseline in Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) A and CDASI-D at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
DBPC Period: Percent Change from Baseline in Cutaneous Dermatomyositis Disease Area and Severity Index (CDASI) A and CDASI-D at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
DBPC Period: Change from Baseline in Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Skin Activity Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
DBPC Period: Percent Change from Baseline in Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) Skin Activity Score at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
OLE Period: Number of Participants with Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)
Time Frame: up to Week 50
up to Week 50
OLE Period: Number of Participants with Clinically Significant Changes from Baseline in Laboratory Parameters, Vital Signs and 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Measurements
Time Frame: up to Week 50
up to Week 50

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Medical Responsible, Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 19, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 25, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

June 25, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 6, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

December 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 17, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

We are committed to enhancing public health through responsible sharing of clinical trial data. Following approval of a new product or a new indication for an approved product in both the US and European Union, the study sponsor and/or its affiliated companies will share study protocols, anonymized patient data and study level data, and redacted clinical study reports with qualified scientific and medical researchers, upon request, as necessary for conducting legitimate research. Further information on how to request data can be found on our website bit.ly/IPD21

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Within six months after the approval of a new product or a new indication for an approved product in both the United States and the European Union

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Qualified scientific and medical researchers can request the data. Such requests must be submitted in writing to the company's portal and will be internally reviewed regarding criteria for researchers' qualification and legitimacy of the research proposal.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dermatomyositis

Clinical Trials on M5049 high dose

Subscribe