- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05653921
Prospective Study to Validate the Imaging Biomarker for NCP (R33)
Prospective Study to Validate the Imaging Biomarker for Neuropathic Corneal Pain.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Dry Eye Disease (DED) is a multifactorial disease of the ocular surface characterized by a loss of homeostasis of the tear film, and accompanied by ocular symptoms, in which tear film instability and hyperosmolarity, ocular surface inflammation and damage, and neurosensory abnormalities.
Neuropathic corneal pain (NCP), an ocular and severe type of neuropathic pain describes patients with symptoms of ocular discomfort out of proportion with clinical signs. The lack of clinical signs observed by standard ophthalmic examination has resulted in underdiagnosis of NCP or misdiagnosis as dry eye disease. Thus, having a biomarker for NCP is critical to identify and treat these patients. No biomarker or clinical signs exists to identify NCP patients.
Investigating corneal neurosensory abnormalities could help to diagnose NCP and potentially differentiate these patients from those with DED. In vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) allows for real-time optical biopsies at a quasi-histological level, allowing for assessment of corneal nerves. IVCM non-invasive diagnostic imaging across NCP, DED, and healthy individuals will be analyzed to validate corneal microneuromas as a biomarker for NCP.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02111
- Tufts Medical Center
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
- Scheie Eye Institute, University of Pennsylvania
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
All Subjects:
- 18 years of age or older
- Ability to consent
- Best corrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better in each eye
Dry Eye Disease Group:
- Chief complaint is ocular surface discomfort or dry eye disease, but subject reports no ocular pain on OPAS questionnaire
- Symptoms lasting at least 3 months
Presence of at least two of the following within the same eye:
- Anesthetized Schirmer score =/< 10mm
- Corneal staining of >3/15 based on NEI scale
- Tear break up time < 10 seconds
Neuropathic Corneal Pain Group:
- Chief complain is ocular surface discomfort or dry eye disease
- Symptoms lasting at least 3 months
All of the following in both eyes:
- Corneal staining of less than or equal to 3/15 based on NEI scale
- Tear break up time =/> 10 seconds
- Must have at least 25% peripheral pain
- Subject reported discomfort prior to drop response testing of at least 3 out of 10
Control Group:
- No symptoms of ocular surface discomfort or dry eye disease
All of the following in both eyes
- Anesthetized Schirmer score > 10 mm
- Corneal staining of less than or equal to 3/15 based on NEI scale
- Tear break up time > 10 seconds
- The same sex and within 5 years of age of a patient within the NCP group.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant or nursing
- Irregular corneal disease
- Ocular surgery in the past 3 months
- Ocular infection in the past 3 months
- Active ocular allergies
- Participation in a study that could potentially impact the IVCM in the opinion of the investigator
- Current use of corneal nerve regeneration therapy that has been on-going for 3 months or more.
- For NCP group only, patients for whom their pain and symptoms can be attributed to other causes in the opinion of the investigator
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Dry Eye Disease Group
Symptoms of ocular surface discomfort or dry eye disease for at least 3 months, supported by clinical exam findings.
Reported quality of life is not effected by ocular pain.
|
In vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) allows for visualization of the corneal structures at the cellular level, allowing for assessment of corneal nerves.
With a magnification of 800 times, it makes it possible to detect and quantify changes in the epithelial layers and sub-basal nerve plexus.
|
|
Neuropathic Corneal Pain Group
Symptoms of ocular surface discomfort or pain for at least 3 months, that are reported to have a significant impact on quality of life and ability to perform daily activities.
|
In vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) allows for visualization of the corneal structures at the cellular level, allowing for assessment of corneal nerves.
With a magnification of 800 times, it makes it possible to detect and quantify changes in the epithelial layers and sub-basal nerve plexus.
|
|
Control Group
No symptoms of ocular surface discomfort or dry eye disease.
|
In vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) allows for visualization of the corneal structures at the cellular level, allowing for assessment of corneal nerves.
With a magnification of 800 times, it makes it possible to detect and quantify changes in the epithelial layers and sub-basal nerve plexus.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Presence of microneuromas as assessed by in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM).
Time Frame: Day 1
|
The obtained sequence of IVCM imaging scans of both eyes will be evaluated for findings of microneuromas; defined as either observed presence or absence of microneuroma
|
Day 1
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Intra-subject repeatability; Presence of the microneuroma biomarker in the same participant at 2 weeks
Time Frame: From Day 1 to 2 weeks
|
Confirmation of presence of microneuroma on IVCM at 2 weeks in participants with IVCM finding of microneruoma at Visit 1
|
From Day 1 to 2 weeks
|
|
Establish the reference interval for the microneuroma biomarker
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Quantification of microneuromas as assessed by IVCM in each cohort (Normal vs. NCP vs. DED)
|
Day 1
|
|
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) questionnaire results correlation to microneuromas; OPAS reported quality of life score compared across the 3 cohorts.
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Ocular Pain Assessment Survey (OPAS) questionnaire: 27-item quantitative questionnaire designed to provide an assessment of the symptoms and quality of life effect of ocular pain.
The 27 items of the OPAS questionnaire are graded on a scale of 0 to 10, or 10 to 100, where 0 indicates none and 10 or 100 indicate maximum.
Higher scores indicate greater impact of ocular pain on quality of life dimensions.
|
Day 1
|
|
Hyperosmolar functional nerve tests in correlation to microneuromas; hyperosmolar functional nerve tests results compared cross cohorts
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Using the Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Symptoms of ocular comfort and dryness at the time in question will be graded for each eye verbally on a scale of 0-10, where 0=excellent comfort, no dryness and 10=extremely uncomfortable, extremely dry.
A single drop of hypertonic sodium chloride solution (Muro 128®, 5%) at room temperature will be instilled into each eye.
After 20 seconds, participants will be asked to grade their ocular comfort and dryness symptoms as described in the VAS procedure again allowing assessment of changes in sensation due to the hyperosmolar drop and activation of the polymodal nociceptors
|
Day 1
|
|
Test the utility of already configured AI software to diagnose NCP patients
Time Frame: Day 1 to 2 weeks
|
categorical variables of NCP and DED as diagnosed by the AI system and the classification of subjects into the NCP and DED groups based on inclusion criteria set by the study
|
Day 1 to 2 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Pedram Hamrah, MD, Tufts Medical Center
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Yu J, Asche CV, Fairchild CJ. The economic burden of dry eye disease in the United States: a decision tree analysis. Cornea. 2011 Apr;30(4):379-87. doi: 10.1097/ICO.0b013e3181f7f363.
- Craig JP, Nichols KK, Akpek EK, Caffery B, Dua HS, Joo CK, Liu Z, Nelson JD, Nichols JJ, Tsubota K, Stapleton F. TFOS DEWS II Definition and Classification Report. Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):276-283. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
- Nichols KK, Bacharach J, Holland E, Kislan T, Shettle L, Lunacsek O, Lennert B, Burk C, Patel V. Impact of Dry Eye Disease on Work Productivity, and Patients' Satisfaction With Over-the-Counter Dry Eye Treatments. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016 Jun 1;57(7):2975-82. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-19419.
- Nichols KK, Nichols JJ, Mitchell GL. The lack of association between signs and symptoms in patients with dry eye disease. Cornea. 2004 Nov;23(8):762-70. doi: 10.1097/01.ico.0000133997.07144.9e.
- Sullivan BD, Crews LA, Messmer EM, Foulks GN, Nichols KK, Baenninger P, Geerling G, Figueiredo F, Lemp MA. Correlations between commonly used objective signs and symptoms for the diagnosis of dry eye disease: clinical implications. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014 Mar;92(2):161-6. doi: 10.1111/aos.12012. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
- Classification of Chronic Pain, Part III: Pain Terms, A Current List with Definitions and Notes on Usage. Second ed. Seattle: IASP Press; 1994
- Dieckmann G, Koseoglu N, Moein HR, Kataguiri P, Hamrah P. Epidemiological factors of neuropathic corneal pain. IASP: The 18th World Congress on Pain; 2018; Boston, MA.
- Lopez MJ, Jamali A, Dieckmann G, et al. Corneal Pain Has a Negative Impact on the Quality of Life of Patients with Neuropathic Corneal Pain. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2018;59(9):138-138
- Lopez MJ, Abbouda A, Pondelis N, et al. The Ocular Pain Assessment Survey and In Vivo Confocal Microscopy as Valuable Tools in the Diagnosis and Management of Patients with Corneal Neuropathic Pain. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 2017;58(8):1013-1013.
- Iuganov EM, Krylov IuV, Kuznetsov VS. [Use of psychophysiological indices in the practice of audiological studies]. Izv Akad Nauk SSSR Biol. 1971 Jul-Aug;4:587-95. No abstract available. Russian.
- Fry HJ. Overuse syndrome, alias tenosynovitis/tendinitis: the terminological hoax. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986 Sep;78(3):414-7. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198609000-00025. No abstract available.
- Fovaeus M, Andersson KE, Hedlund H. Calcium channel blockade and contractile responses in the isolated human vas deferens. J Urol. 1987 Sep;138(3):654-8. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)43292-7.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY00003018
- 4R33NS113341-02 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.