Acupoint Focused Ultrasound Versus Laserpuncture In Mechanical Neck Pain (MNP)

March 11, 2023 updated by: Dina Ahmed Ahmed Asr, Cairo University

Acupoint Focused Ultrasound Versus Laserpuncture In Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain

this study will be conducted to compare the effect of Acupoint focused ultrasound and Laser puncture on pain intensity level, neck range of motion, and neck function in patient with chronic mechanical neck pain

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Neck pain is a musculoskeletal condition with a high prevalence that may affect the physical, social, and psychological aspects of the individual, contributing to the increase in costs in society and business. Neck pain was significantly associated with repetitive movement, activities that require lifting and moving loads, and being in sitting and leaning positions.Non specific neck pain is a multifactorial and very common condition in adult individuals, traditional acupuncture (TA) and laser puncture (LP) may be treatment options for certain individuals in such a condition. The laser will be placed at the specific acupuncture points: Tianzhu, Fengchi, Jianjing, and Jianzhongshu . Because ultrasound can deliver vibration energy to soft tissues noninvasively, ultrasound has been applied to diagnostic imaging and therapeutic applications. To use ultrasound for acupoint stimulation, a stimulation device was developed using focused ultrasound. The application of an ultrasound stimulus to the acupuncture meridian system has been found safe and effective in many common clinical entities. The Sonicator head is applied to the chosen location as in standard ultrasound therapy, with a gentle circular motion. forty five patients will be assigned randomly to three groups; experimental group 1 will receive acupoint focused ultrasound, experimental group 2 will receive laserpuncture and the control group will receive conventional treatment three times a week for four weeks.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

45

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

All subjects will be referred by the orthopedist. Cervical pain is episodic chronic, having occurred and recurred over regular or irregular intervals of time over at least the last 3 months.

The subject is willing and able to refrain from non-study procedure therapies for the management of neck pain throughout study participation.

Age ranged from 30-60 years BMI ranged from (25-30kg/m2)

Exclusion Criteria:

Cervical pain is undiagnosed or has been diagnosed as being other than of benign musculoskeletal origin.

Tension myositis syndrome. Osteoporosis with compression fractures. Congenital deformity of spine. Current active chronic pain disease. Cancer or cancer treatment in the past 6 months. Use of the following analgesics within 7 days of study onset - paracetamol, acetominophen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), compound analgesics, topical analgesics.

Use of the following muscle relaxants within the prior 30 days of study onset - cyclobenzaprine, diazepam, meprobamate.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: conventional treatment
the patients will receive conventional treatment three times a week for four weeks
the patients will receive selective neck strengthening ex for (extension, flexion, sidebending, lateral rotation) and selective neck stretching ex for (extension, flexion, sidebending, lateral rotation)
Experimental: Acupoint focused ultrasound
the patients will receive Acupoint focused ultrasound therapy three times a week for four weeks
An ultrasound beam is normally pulsed in the ratio of 1:5. For perfect transmission of power from the treatment head to the body, the head will be applied perpendicularly to the skin surface. A stationary technique pulsed ultrasound (1 w/cm2) will be used. The application will be two minutes for each acupuncture point and the head will be glided to the next point in the same side; then to the other side for no more than 10 points, then the device will be turned off
the patients will receive selective neck strengthening ex for (extension, flexion, sidebending, lateral rotation) and selective neck stretching ex for (extension, flexion, sidebending, lateral rotation)
Experimental: Laserpuncture
the patients will receive Laserpuncture therapy three times a week for four weeks
the patients will receive selective neck strengthening ex for (extension, flexion, sidebending, lateral rotation) and selective neck stretching ex for (extension, flexion, sidebending, lateral rotation)
The laser tip (0.03 cm2 of beam area) will be positioned with the "probe" head directly on the acupuncture point, in a perpendicular position and in direct contact with the skin, and every point will be treated for 2 min, totaling 16 min of treatment, plus 4 min of rest, to standardize with the traditional acupuncture time, which is 20 min

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pain intensity
Time Frame: up to four weeks
pain will be measured by visual analogue scale. It is a vertical or horizontal 100 mm line graduated by different levels of pain, starting from 0 (no pain) till 100 (worst pain)
up to four weeks
Disability
Time Frame: up to four weeks
The Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale will be used to evaluate the disability experienced by patients with neck pain. it consists of 15 items. These items are individually answered by either 'yes', 'occasionally' or 'no'. For questions one till five, a 'yes' indicates a good function. For questions six till fifteen, a 'no' indicates a good function. A good function receives a score of zero, a poor function receives a score of two and the answer 'occasionally' always receives a score of one. Afterwards, we add up all the scores of the questions to form the total score. This total score ranges from 0 to 30.The total score determines the level of functional disability, in which higher numbers represent a higher level of disability. A score of 0 indicates that there are no neck complaints present whereas 30 indicates that the patient is extremely disabled as a result of the neck complaints
up to four weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
cervical range of motion
Time Frame: up to four weeks
The digital goniometer will be used for measuring cervical range of motion
up to four weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

March 30, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 30, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 11, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

March 23, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 23, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • P.T.REC/012/004126

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe