Relevance and Salience During Attention Task

February 1, 2024 updated by: Lehigh University
In this line of research, the researchers are examining the influence of relevance of a salient item on task performance, depending on overall task set.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

When finding a target item during visual search (looking for a pencil), a salient item can capture attention (your phone flashing from a message). Typical attention studies only examine salient items when shown as distractor during search, to ensure any attention to the items are driven by salience alone. However, the impact of salience may interact with the relevance of the item for the search task (e.g. how likely the salient item is to be the target). Here, the researchers investigate these interactions in a basic science study when participants perform an easy task or a difficult search task.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

117

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, United States, 18015
        • Lehigh University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • normal or corrected to normal visual acuity, normal color vision

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 0% Relevance
0% chance of the salient item being the target during visual search task.
The proportion of trials, when the salient visual item is present in the array, where the salient item is the search target.
Experimental: 25% Relevance
25% chance of the salient item being the target during visual search task.
The proportion of trials, when the salient visual item is present in the array, where the salient item is the search target.
Experimental: 50% Relevance
50% chance of the salient item being the target during visual search task.
The proportion of trials, when the salient visual item is present in the array, where the salient item is the search target.
Experimental: 75% Relevance
75% chance of the salient item being the target during visual search task.
The proportion of trials, when the salient visual item is present in the array, where the salient item is the search target.
Experimental: 100% Relevance
100% chance of the salient item being the target during visual search task.
The proportion of trials, when the salient visual item is present in the array, where the salient item is the search target.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Button Press Reaction Time
Time Frame: During Testing (single day)
Speed to respond correctly to the target- after participant finds the target shape on a computer screen, they press a button to indicate what shape they see
During Testing (single day)
Button Press Accuracy
Time Frame: During Testing (single day)
Accuracy of responses to target item- the researchers will measure whether the participants presses the correct button which corresponds to the target shape presented on the computer screen or the incorrect button
During Testing (single day)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 15, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 28, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

October 28, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 13, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

March 24, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 2, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 5R15EY030247-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The researchers plan to share anonymized subject data on Open Science Framework.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Upon publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Open Science Framework, Internet access.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Subscribe