- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05796661
Patients Undergoing Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration: Effects of Increased Blood Flow
Evaluation of Filters Useful Life, Metabolic Control, Electrolyte Profile and Acid-base Balance During Regional Anticoagulation With 4% Trisodium Citrate in Patients Undergoing CVVHDF: Effects of Increased Blood Flow
Acute Kidney Injure (AKI) is a syndrome with high incidence and prevalence in Intensive Care Units (ICU). It is estimated that 50% of the in the sector present AKI at some point and 10 to 15% require renal replacement therapy (RRT). Although studies do not show the superiority of continuous methods, the most severely ill patients are directed to this type of RRT. A disadvantage of continuous therapies is the need for anticoagulation. Critically ill patients have a pro-clotting state (inflammation) and several risk factors for bleeding (coagulopathies, postoperative, large vessel puncture).
On the one hand, ineffective anticoagulation compromises the efficiency of the procedure, shortens the life of the extracorporeal system, consumes resources and increases blood loss due to unexpected and early filter clotting. There is no consensus on what would be the optimal blood flow (Qb) in continuous dialysis, especially when regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) is used. Theoretically, a higher flow rate would prevent stasis in the system and decrease the risk of filter clotting. Studies show conflicting results. Increasing Qb from 150 to 250 mL/min showed that circuit life and the chance of coagulation were similar. On the other hand, blood flow is important for maintaining the filtration fraction (FF), the ratio of ultrafiltrate flow to plasma flow. Ideally, the FF should be kept below 25% to avoid hemoconcentration and coagulation of the filter. Therefore, the higher the convection rate, the higher the blood flow should be to keep the FF in the optimal range. Since the anticoagulation capacity of citrate is dependent on its concentration, around 4 mmol/L of blood, by increasing the blood flow, the citrate infusion is proportionally increased. Theoretically, the higher citrate load offered should be metabolized and, in theory, could cause its overload with the occurrence of metabolic alkalosis and hypernatremia. This situation occurs when its maximum metabolizing capacity is not reached and there is an excess of citrate infusion relative to the buffering requirement. Thus, we intend to evaluate filter useful life, metabolic control, electrolyte profile and acid-base balance in ICU patients undergoing continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF), regional citrate anticoagulation during blood flow augmentation.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a clinical syndrome with a high incidence and prevalence in Intensive care units (ICU). It is estimated that 50% of ICU patients have AKI at some point.
About 10-15% of these individuals require renal replacement therapy (RRT). Although studies have not conclusively shown the superiority of continuous methods, the most severe patients are usually referred for this type of therapy.
The main indications for continuous therapies are hemodynamic instability, cardiogenic shock, severe respiratory insufficiency, risk situations for brain edema, hypercatabolism, need for strict volume control, acute liver disease and major sodium disturbances. One of the main disadvantages of continuous therapies is the necessity of anticoagulation. Critically ill patients have a pro-clotting state (inflammation) and several risk factors for bleeding (coagulopathies, postoperative, large vessel puncture). On the one hand, the lack or ineffective anticoagulation compromises the efficiency of the procedure, shortens the life of the extracorporeal system, consumes resources and increases blood loss due to unexpected and early filter coagulation. On the other hand, excessive use of anticoagulants, especially heparin, is associated with bleeding and increased transfusions.
In this scenario, regional anticoagulation with citrate (RCA) has become the method of choice in the different modalities of continuous dialysis. When compared to heparin, the use of regional citrate anticoagulation is associated with less bleeding and transfusion need and longer life of the extracorporeal system. It also seems to decrease endothelial activation, neutrophil degranulation and activation of the complement system.
The anticoagulate property of citrate is based on its binding to calcium (Ca). Citrate quenches Ca in the extracorporeal system, an essential cofactor in several steps of coagulation. Optimal anticoagulation is achieved when ionic Ca concentration in the extracorporeal circuit is maintained between 0.25 and 0.35 mmol/L. This is usually achieved with a citrate level in the circuit around 4mmol/L of blood. Depending on the modality chosen and other factors, up to 60% of the citrate-Ca complex is eliminated during passage through the filter (molecular weigh of 298 Daltons and partition coefficient of 1.0). The rest is metabolized in the Krebs cycle mainly in the liver, kidneys and skeletal muscles. Each mol of trisodium citrate causes 3 moles of bicarbonate thus correctly, partially or completely, the metabolic acidosis resulting from renal failure. Ca and sodium (Na) are released into the systemic circulation. Trisodium citrate also increases the strong ion difference due to the high sodium concentration in the solution, thus increasing the buffering capacity. In parallel it is necessary the Ca replacement to maintain normal calcemia. The citrate also quenches magnesium, which can lead to a disturbance of this electrolyte.
There is no consensus on what the optimal blood flow (Qb) would be in continuous dialysis, especially when using regional citrate anticoagulation. Theoretically, a higher blood flow would prevent stasis in the system and thus decrease the risk of filter coagulation. Studies show conflicting results. For example, one study evaluated increasing Qb from 150 to 250 mL/min and showed that circuit useful life and the chance of coagulation of the extracorporeal system were similar between the two groups. On the other hand, blood flow is important for maintaining the filtration fraction (FF), the ratio of ultra-filtrated flow to plasma flow (blood flow minus hematocrit). Ideally, the FF should be kept below 25% to avoid hemoconcentration and coagulation of the filter capillary fibers. So the higher the convection rate (ultrafiltration), the higher the blood flow should be to keep the FF in the optimal range.
Since the anticoagulation capacity of citrate is dependent on its concentration, around 4 mmol/L of blood, by increasing blood flow, citrate infusion is proportionally increased. Theoretically, the higher citrate load offered should be metabolized and, in theory, could lead to citrate overload with the occurrence of metabolic alkalosis and hypernatremia. This situation occurs when the maximum capacity of citrate metabolization is not reached and there is an excess of citrate infusion relative to the buffering requirement. The total Ca/systemic ionic Ca ration remains normal, below 2.5. The oversupply of citrate can be easily corrected by decreasing the bicarbonate concentration of the dialysate, increasing the dialysate dose or decreasing the citrate infusion.
Therefore, we intend to evaluate filter useful life, metabolic control, electrolyte profile and acid-base balance in ICU patients with AKI undergoing continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF), regional anticoagulation with citrate during increased blood flow.
Hypothesis: Increasing blood flow during continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration prevents stasis in the system and thus reduces the risk of filter coagulation. Blood flow is important for maintaining the filtration fraction (FF), the ratio of ultrafiltrate flow to plasma flow (blood flow minus hematocrit). Ideally, the FF should be kept below 25% to avoid hemoconcentration and coagulation of the filter capillary fibers. So the higher convection rate (ultrafiltration), the higher the blood flow should be to keep the FF in the optimal range. Therefore, it is expected that higher blood flow (250 mL/min) will reduce the FF and concomitantly prolong the life of the filter.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Avila Neto
- Phone Number: +5534991692861
- Email: lucasavilaneto@gmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Hospital I Albert Einstein
- Phone Number: +551121513729
- Email: cep@einstein.br
Study Locations
-
-
-
São Paulo, Brazil
- Recruiting
- Hospital Israelite Albert Einstein
-
Contact:
- Lucas Ávila Neto
- Phone Number: +55 (34) 991692861
- Email: lucasneto@einstein.br
-
Principal Investigator:
- Marcelino Durão Junior
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
The inclusion criteria will be:
- Age greater than 18 years.
- Weight ≥ 50 Kg.
- Agreeing to participate in the study (TCLE duly elucidated and signed by the patient or family member/guardian).
- Admitted to the hospital ICU.
- Acute Kidney Injury in need of RRT and indication (according to the evaluation of the assistant nephrologist) of continuous therapy.
Exclusion criteria will be:
- Age < 18 years.
- Weight < 50 Kg.
- Refusal to participate in the study (absence of informed consent).
- Patient with chronic kidney disease on dialysis
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Qb150
This group will be exposed to continuous venovenous therapy with a blood flow of 150ml/min; already standardized by the institution; for a maximum time of 72 hours or interrupted sooner if the system clots or the filter loses patency. Both groups will have a "wash out" of 6 hours before crossing the arms of the work. |
Patients will be exposed to continuous venovenous renal therapy with distinct blood flows in 2 periods, to be defined by draw.
The control group will have a flow of 150ml/min and the intervention group 250ml/min.
Therapy is intended for a period of 72 hours (maximum defined by the manufacturer); with a 6-hour "washout" and, after that, the arm is changed to be exposed to the other blood flow.
|
Active Comparator: Qb 250
This group will be exposed to continuous venovenous therapy with a blood flow of 250ml/min; experimental group to evaluate increased blood flow and filter durability; for a maximum time of 72 hours or interrupted sooner if the system clots or the filter loses patency. Both groups will have a "wash out" of 6 hours before crossing the arms of the work. |
Patients will be exposed to continuous venovenous renal therapy with distinct blood flows in 2 periods, to be defined by draw.
The control group will have a flow of 150ml/min and the intervention group 250ml/min.
Therapy is intended for a period of 72 hours (maximum defined by the manufacturer); with a 6-hour "washout" and, after that, the arm is changed to be exposed to the other blood flow.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Analyze filter/system useful life
Time Frame: 72 hours per filter
|
Evaluate the duration of the continuous hemodiafiltration filter according to changes in blood flow
|
72 hours per filter
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Examine the system pressures
Time Frame: 72 hours per filter
|
Assess changes in system pressures during the 2 blood flows (transmembrane pressure, filter pressure and access pressure)
|
72 hours per filter
|
Mortality of the cohort
Time Frame: 30, 60 and 90 days
|
Assess the overall mortality of the cohort in 30, 60 and 90 days
|
30, 60 and 90 days
|
Assess filtration fraction variation
Time Frame: 72 hours per filter
|
Assess filtration fraction variation during the 2 blood flows
|
72 hours per filter
|
Electrolytic control - Potassium
Time Frame: 72 hours per filter (dosage every 12 hours according to protocol)
|
Assess changes in potassium (changes from baseline)
|
72 hours per filter (dosage every 12 hours according to protocol)
|
Electrolytic control - Sodium
Time Frame: 72 hours per filter (dosage every 12 hours according to protocol)
|
Assess changes in sodium (changes from baseline)
|
72 hours per filter (dosage every 12 hours according to protocol)
|
Acid-base balance - blood pH
Time Frame: 72 hours per filter (venous blood gas analysis every 12 hours)
|
Assess changes in blood pH during the 2 blood flows (changes from baseline)
|
72 hours per filter (venous blood gas analysis every 12 hours)
|
Acid-base balance - sodium bicarbonate
Time Frame: 72 hours per filter (venous blood gas analysis every 12 hours)
|
Assess changes in sodium bicarbonate during the 2 blood flows (changes from baseline)
|
72 hours per filter (venous blood gas analysis every 12 hours)
|
Acid-base balance - base excess
Time Frame: 72 hours per filter (venous blood gas analysis every 12 hours)
|
Assess changes in base excess during the 2 blood flows (changes from baseline)
|
72 hours per filter (venous blood gas analysis every 12 hours)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Lucas T Avila Neto, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Khwaja A. KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury. Nephron Clin Pract. 2012;120(4):c179-84. doi: 10.1159/000339789. Epub 2012 Aug 7. No abstract available.
- Bauer E, Derfler K, Joukhadar C, Druml W. Citrate kinetics in patients receiving long-term hemodialysis therapy. Am J Kidney Dis. 2005 Nov;46(5):903-7. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2005.07.041.
- Kellum JA, Romagnani P, Ashuntantang G, Ronco C, Zarbock A, Anders HJ. Acute kidney injury. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021 Jul 15;7(1):52. doi: 10.1038/s41572-021-00284-z.
- Fuhrman DY, Kellum JA. Acute Kidney Injury in the Intensive Care Unit: Advances in the Identification, Classification, and Treatment of a Multifactorial Syndrome. Crit Care Clin. 2021 Apr;37(2):xiii-xv. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2021.01.001. Epub 2021 Feb 13. No abstract available.
- Bellomo R, Baldwin I, Ronco C, Kellum JA. ICU-Based Renal Replacement Therapy. Crit Care Med. 2021 Mar 1;49(3):406-418. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004831. No abstract available.
- Khadzhynov D, Schelter C, Lieker I, Mika A, Staeck O, Neumayer HH, Peters H, Slowinski T. Incidence and outcome of metabolic disarrangements consistent with citrate accumulation in critically ill patients undergoing continuous venovenous hemodialysis with regional citrate anticoagulation. J Crit Care. 2014 Apr;29(2):265-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2013.10.015. Epub 2013 Nov 11.
- Gattas DJ, Rajbhandari D, Bradford C, Buhr H, Lo S, Bellomo R. A Randomized Controlled Trial of Regional Citrate Versus Regional Heparin Anticoagulation for Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in Critically Ill Adults. Crit Care Med. 2015 Aug;43(8):1622-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001004.
- Stucker F, Ponte B, Tataw J, Martin PY, Wozniak H, Pugin J, Saudan P. Efficacy and safety of citrate-based anticoagulation compared to heparin in patients with acute kidney injury requiring continuous renal replacement therapy: a randomized controlled trial. Crit Care. 2015 Mar 18;19(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0822-z.
- Meersch M, Kullmar M, Wempe C, Kindgen-Milles D, Kluge S, Slowinski T, Marx G, Gerss J, Zarbock A; SepNet Critical Care Trials Group. Regional citrate versus systemic heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (RICH) trial: study protocol for a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 21;9(1):e024411. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024411.
- Zarbock A, Kullmar M, Kindgen-Milles D, Wempe C, Gerss J, Brandenburger T, Dimski T, Tyczynski B, Jahn M, Mulling N, Mehrlander M, Rosenberger P, Marx G, Simon TP, Jaschinski U, Deetjen P, Putensen C, Schewe JC, Kluge S, Jarczak D, Slowinski T, Bodenstein M, Meybohm P, Wirtz S, Moerer O, Kortgen A, Simon P, Bagshaw SM, Kellum JA, Meersch M; RICH Investigators and the Sepnet Trial Group. Effect of Regional Citrate Anticoagulation vs Systemic Heparin Anticoagulation During Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy on Dialysis Filter Life Span and Mortality Among Critically Ill Patients With Acute Kidney Injury: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020 Oct 27;324(16):1629-1639. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.18618.
- Kramer L, Bauer E, Joukhadar C, Strobl W, Gendo A, Madl C, Gangl A. Citrate pharmacokinetics and metabolism in cirrhotic and noncirrhotic critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2003 Oct;31(10):2450-5. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000084871.76568.E6.
- Yu W, Zhuang F, Ma S, Fan Q, Zhu M, Ding F. Optimized Calcium Supplementation Approach for Regional Citrate Anticoagulation. Nephron. 2019;141(2):119-127. doi: 10.1159/000494693. Epub 2018 Nov 16.
- Schneider AG, Journois D, Rimmele T. Complications of regional citrate anticoagulation: accumulation or overload? Crit Care. 2017 Nov 19;21(1):281. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1880-1.
- AYRES, M., AYRES Jr, M., AYRES, D. L., SANTOS, A. A. S. Bioestat 5.3 aplicações estatísticas nas áreas das ciências biológicas e médicas. Belém: IDSM, 2007.364p.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Kidney Diseases
- Urologic Diseases
- Renal Insufficiency
- Female Urogenital Diseases
- Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
- Urogenital Diseases
- Male Urogenital Diseases
- Acute Kidney Injury
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Anticoagulants
- Chelating Agents
- Sequestering Agents
- Calcium Chelating Agents
- Citric Acid
- Sodium Citrate
Other Study ID Numbers
- CRRT-QbTrial
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Acute Kidney Injury
-
Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia Ignacio ChavezInstituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador ZubiranUnknownKidney Injury, Acute | Acute Renal Injury | Acute Kidney Injuries | Kidney Injuries, Acute | Acute Renal InjuriesMexico
-
Yonsei UniversityCompletedAcute Kidney Injury(Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Aortic Surgery)Korea, Republic of
-
University Hospital, GhentWithdrawn
-
Beni-Suef UniversityCairo UniversityRecruitingAKI - Acute Kidney InjuryEgypt
-
University Hospital MuensterBaxter Healthcare CorporationCompletedAcute Kidney Injury (AKI)Spain, France, United States, Turkey, Germany, Egypt, Italy, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Malta, North Macedonia, Palestinian Territory, occupied, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, Slovenia
-
Chinese PLA General HospitalBeijing Tsinghua Changgeng HospitalCompletedPostoperative Acute Kidney InjuryChina
-
Chinese PLA General HospitalCompletedPostoperative Acute Kidney InjuryChina
-
Ain Shams UniversityRecruiting
-
Astellas Pharma IncCompleted
-
South Egypt Cancer InstituteCompletedAcute Kidney Injury (AKI)Egypt