Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Dysphagia in the Stroke Patient

May 16, 2023 updated by: Lai chien hung, Taipei Medical University Hospital

Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Dysphagia in Individuals With Stroke

Participants suffered from acute stroke with dysphagia in single hospital who were determined by CT/MRI and clinical evaluation. Current project will recruit participants and randomize into two groups.One group will receive NMES, traditional swallowing therapy and rTMS therapy five times per week for 2 weeks ; Another group will receive NMES and traditional swallowing therapy with shame rTMS five times per week for 2 weeks. FEES and SSA were used for evaluated swallowing function before the therapy and after 2 weeks therapy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Participants suffered from acute stroke with dysphagia in single hospital who were determined by CT/MRI and clinical evaluation. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of rTMS, NMES and conventional swallowing therapy to those of sham rTMS, NMES and conventional swallowing therapy. One group will receive NMES, to sham One group will receive NMES,traditional swallowing therapy and rTMS therapy five times per week for 2 weeks ; Another group will receive NMES and traditional swallowing therapy with shame rTMS five times per week for 2 weeks. MEP character, FEES, degrees of dysphagia, FOIS, and SSA were used for evaluated swallowing function before the therapy and after 2 weeks therapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Chien-Hung Lai, MD, PhD
  • Phone Number: 3243 02-27372181
  • Email: chlai@tmu.edu.tw

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Taipei, Taiwan, 110
        • Recruiting
        • Taipei Medical University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Chien-Hung Lai, PhD
          • Phone Number: 1236 +886-2-27372181
          • Email: chlai@tmu.edu.tw
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Chien-Hung Lai, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. stroke
  2. Onset time at least for one week,area not be limited.
  3. Patient was first time stroke patient without obvious infection condition.
  4. Patients with dysphagia in the stroke who were diagnosed by neurologist and CT/MRI in our institute. Patient was clear with adequate motivation and could cooperate the whole therapy and FEES evaluation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Lower motor neuron disease, such as autonomic dysreflexia, facial palsy, hyhoid muscle denervation.
  2. Mental status unstable, mental retardation, schizophrenia, bipolar disease were be excluded.
  3. Metal implantation of head, ventroperotoneal shunt or any seizure history, pacemaker, as well as head and neck cancer.
  4. Allergy to specific subjects
  5. Cognition impairment
  6. Alcohol or drugs abuse
  7. Afraid of the noise of rTMS.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group A
Conscript 10 individuals, every individual will receive 20 mins of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and 30 min NMES combined with conventional swallowing therapy, 5 times per week, lasting for 2 weeks.
Participants suffered from acute stroke with dysphagia in single hospital who were determined by CT/MRI and clinical evaluation. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of rTMS, Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and conventional swallowing therapy to those of sham rTMS, Neuromuscular electrical stimulation(NMES) and conventional swallowing therapy. One group will receive Neuromuscular electrical stimulation(NMES), to sham One group will receive Neuromuscular electrical stimulation(NMES),traditional swallowing therapy and rTMS therapy five times per week for 2 weeks ; Another group will receive Neuromuscular electrical stimulation(NMES) and traditional swallowing therapy with shame rTMS five times per week for 2 weeks. MEP character, FEES, degrees of dysphagia, FOIS, and SSA were used for evaluated swallowing function before the therapy and after 2 weeks therapy.
Participants suffered from acute stroke with dysphagia in single hospital who were determined by CT/MRI and clinical evaluation. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of rTMS, Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and conventional swallowing therapy to those of sham rTMS, Neuromuscular electrical stimulation(NMES) and conventional swallowing therapy. One group will receive Neuromuscular electrical stimulation(NMES), to sham One group will receive Neuromuscular electrical stimulation(NMES),traditional swallowing therapy and rTMS therapy five times per week for 2 weeks ; Another group will receive Neuromuscular electrical stimulation(NMES) and traditional swallowing therapy with shame rTMS five times per week for 2 weeks. MEP character, FEES, degrees of dysphagia, FOIS, and SSA were used for evaluated swallowing function before the therapy and after 2 weeks therapy.
Sham Comparator: Group B
Conscript 10 individuals, every individual will receive sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and 30 min NMES combined with conventional swallowing therapy, 5 times per week, lasting for 2 weeks.
Participants suffered from acute stroke with dysphagia in single hospital who were determined by CT/MRI and clinical evaluation. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of rTMS, Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and conventional swallowing therapy to those of sham rTMS, Neuromuscular electrical stimulation(NMES) and conventional swallowing therapy. One group will receive Neuromuscular electrical stimulation(NMES), to sham One group will receive Neuromuscular electrical stimulation(NMES),traditional swallowing therapy and rTMS therapy five times per week for 2 weeks ; Another group will receive Neuromuscular electrical stimulation(NMES) and traditional swallowing therapy with shame rTMS five times per week for 2 weeks. MEP character, FEES, degrees of dysphagia, FOIS, and SSA were used for evaluated swallowing function before the therapy and after 2 weeks therapy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in Fiberoptic Endoscopic Examination of Swallowing (FEES) at 2 weeks
Time Frame: one day before intervention, 1 day after intervention

In this study, FEES is executed before and after intervention. The assessment of FEES is as follows.

Hyodo-score: for predicting aspiration with moderate sensitivity and high specificity.

This method consists of four parameters; These four parameters are each scored 0-3 on a 4 point scale (0; normal, 1; mildly impaired, 2; moderately impaired, 3; severely impaired). The Hyodo score is expressed as the sum of scores for each of the four parameters, ranging 0- 12. Patients with a score of less than 5 were assessed as having normal swallowing function. Patients with a score of more than 8 had severe swallowing dysfunction and would not be allowed any oral intake.

one day before intervention, 1 day after intervention
Change from baseline in The Fiberoptic Endoscopic Dysphagia Severity Scale (FEDSS) at 2 weeks
Time Frame: one day before intervention, 1 day after intervention

The Fiberoptic Endoscopic Dysphagia Severity Scale (FEDSS):

Stroke-related dysphagia was divided into a six-point FEDSS with 1 score for the best and 6 scores for the worst.

one day before intervention, 1 day after intervention
Change of baseline Standardized Swallowing Assessment (SSA) at 2 weeks
Time Frame: one day before intervention, 1 day after intervention
In this study, SSA was executed before and after intervention. SSA is a standard of universal screening of all stroke patients within 24 hours of admission. And SSA comprises three sections and was designed to terminate if a problem was encountered. The first section checked whether the patient was physically capable of screening; sections 2 and 3 comprised the main screening test. Volitional cough, saliva control, oral motor dexterity, respiratory compromise and phonation were first evaluated; if no problems were elicited, the ability to swallow water was observed.
one day before intervention, 1 day after intervention
Change of baseline Latency of Motor evoked potentials (MEP) at 2 weeks
Time Frame: one day before intervention, 1 day after intervention
Onset latency of MEP, The latency, however, may provide information about the stress in damaged motor pathways.
one day before intervention, 1 day after intervention
Change of baseline Amplitude of Motor evoked potentials (MEP) at 2 weeks
Time Frame: one day before intervention, 1 day after intervention.
Onset to peak amplitude of Motor evoked potentials (MEP).The amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a common yet highly variable measure of corticospinal excitability.
one day before intervention, 1 day after intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of baseline Degree of dysphagia at 2 weeks
Time Frame: one day before intervention, 1 day after intervention
Score of degree of dysphagia, score 0 shows normal swallowing, score 1 is able to swallow , some solid food, score 2 is able to swallow semi-liquid food, score 3 is able to swallow liquids only, score 4 exhibits absolute dysphagia.
one day before intervention, 1 day after intervention
Change of Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) at 2 weeks
Time Frame: one day before intervention, 1 day after intervention
Functional Oral Intake Scale
one day before intervention, 1 day after intervention
Change of baseline modified water swallowing test at 2 weeks
Time Frame: one day before intervention, 1 day after intervention
modified water swallowing test
one day before intervention, 1 day after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chien-Hung Lai, MD, PhD, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Taipei Medical University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 23, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 30, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 19, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 17, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 17, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 16, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

3
Subscribe