Group-based Integrative Pain Management (IPMP+ Pilot) (IPMP+)

January 6, 2025 updated by: University of California, San Francisco

Pilot Phase of Group-based Integrative Pain Management: A Multi-level Approach to Address Intersectional Stigma and Social Isolation in Diverse Primary Care Safety Net Patients With Chronic Pain

Socioeconomically disadvantaged populations have a high prevalence of chronic pain, exacerbated by social isolation, intersectional stigma, and disparities in pain assessment and treatment options. Effective interventions using a multilevel, biopsychosocial approach are needed to decrease the unequal burden of pain. The proposed pilot study will test group-based integrative models of pain management in primary care safety net clinics to improve pain care for racially and ethnically diverse low-income patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Background: The proposed pilot study seeks to address chronic pain disparities in racially diverse, socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals by optimizing multimodal pain management provided in primary care safety net clinics. Multilevel barriers exist in primary care settings where socioeconomically disadvantaged patients are most often treated. Lack of access to multimodal and nonpharmacologic care at the organizational level alongside provider bias and other forms of discrimination at the interpersonal level contribute to unequal assessment, treatment, and quality of pain care. Stigmatization cross-cuts all levels and is closely linked with social isolation common among individuals with chronic pain. Group-based models are a promising multilevel approach to increase access to non-pharmacologic therapies, address time constraints that contribute to disparities in pain care, improve patient-clinician communication, and provide social support among safety net patients with chronic pain.

Methods: This pilot study uses mixed methods and a pragmatic 2x2 randomized factorial trial to test two group-based models: integrative group medical visits (IGMV) and group acupuncture. Study interventions include 12 weekly sessions based on existing protocols tested in primary care safety net settings. IGMV includes pain education, social and behavioral support, and mind-body approaches (meditation, yoga). Group acupuncture uses responsive manualization, allowing for a standardized yet individualized treatment. During this pilot study, a panel of national experts and patient stakeholders will refine and optimize the structure, process, and content of IGMV aimed at reducing social isolation and intersectional stigma as part of pain management. Interventions will be piloted in 40 English or Spanish speaking patients with chronic pain at two primary care safety net clinics. Study procedures will be tested and adapted for a larger scale trial. The larger study will test the hypotheses that compared with usual care, each study intervention improves pain interference and social isolation (primary outcomes), and that the two combined have synergistic effects mediated by increased social support and decreased impact of intersectional stigma among safety net patients with chronic pain.

Significance: Multilevel approaches are needed to advance health equity in pain management. The proposed study will contribute to knowledge of group-based integrative pain management co-located in primary care to address disparities in pain care for socioeconomically vulnerable populations. The study receives support from the Helping to End Addiction Long-term® (HEAL) Initiative (https://heal.nih.gov/).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

44

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94102
        • Tom Waddell Urban Health Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adults aged > 18
  • fluency in English or Spanish;
  • panelled to a primary care provider at one of the study clinics;
  • diagnosis of chronic pain (> 3 months);
  • had a primary care visit for chronic pain within the past six months;
  • ability to provide a phone number;
  • able to participate in groups;
  • intent to be available for up to 24 weeks.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • current anticoagulant use
  • active cancer treatment
  • inability to provide informed consent due to mental illness or cognitive impairment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: group acupuncture and IGMV
Both group acupuncture and IGMV. Along with usual care, participants will be offered weekly group acupuncture treatments and integrative group medical visits as described above.
Acupuncture will be delivered in a group setting, in a common space with multiple reclining chairs. Acupuncture treatments will include a 10-15 minute diagnostic intake with the acupuncturist, followed by administration of acupuncture needles retained for 20-40 minutes. Acupuncture points will be selected based on a treatment manual developed for the study. All treatments will be administered using sterile, disposable, surgical stainless steel acupuncture needles.
IGMV sessions will be weekly for 90 minutes in a group meeting space. Sessions will start with a "check-in" where participants can share their emotions, thoughts, hopes, and fears related to their health and pain and provide updates since the last session. Group sessions will be led by a primary care provider and a health educator and will include psychosocial support, tools for pain self-management, and psychoeducation for pain management. Invited experts will provide information on educational topics, including neurobiology of pain, medication safety, and connections between mood and pain, as well as participatory activities such as therapeutic movement or mindfulness practice.
No Intervention: usual care
Participants will receive care as usual provided through their primary care providers. Usual care includes medical diagnostic evaluation, analgesic drug therapies, recommendations for physical activity, and sometimes referral to specialist physicians or physical therapy.
Experimental: group acupuncture
Participants randomized to acupuncture will receive 12 weeks of acupuncture treatments delivered in a group setting.
Acupuncture will be delivered in a group setting, in a common space with multiple reclining chairs. Acupuncture treatments will include a 10-15 minute diagnostic intake with the acupuncturist, followed by administration of acupuncture needles retained for 20-40 minutes. Acupuncture points will be selected based on a treatment manual developed for the study. All treatments will be administered using sterile, disposable, surgical stainless steel acupuncture needles.
Experimental: Integrative Group Medical Visits (IGMV)
IGMV will consist of a 12-week program that provides education on the biopsychosocial model of pain and multimodal treatments; physical movement; mindfulness training; and peer support.
IGMV sessions will be weekly for 90 minutes in a group meeting space. Sessions will start with a "check-in" where participants can share their emotions, thoughts, hopes, and fears related to their health and pain and provide updates since the last session. Group sessions will be led by a primary care provider and a health educator and will include psychosocial support, tools for pain self-management, and psychoeducation for pain management. Invited experts will provide information on educational topics, including neurobiology of pain, medication safety, and connections between mood and pain, as well as participatory activities such as therapeutic movement or mindfulness practice.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Eligible Patients Who Are Randomized
Time Frame: Randomization
Percentage of patients with confirmed eligibility who are randomized
Randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Randomized Participants Who Complete the Study
Time Frame: 3-month follow up
Retention as percentage of randomized who complete 3-month follow up survey
3-month follow up
Intervention Adherence
Time Frame: 12 weeks
average number of intervention sessions attended
12 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Interference on the 8-item NIH Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Survey
Time Frame: 3-month follow up
Self-reported pain interference will be measured using the 8-item NIH Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scale. Total t-scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater levels of pain interference.
3-month follow up
Social Isolation on the 8-item NIH Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Survey
Time Frame: 3-month follow up
Self-reported social isolation will be measured using the 8-item PROMIS scale. Total t-scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater levels of social isolation.
3-month follow up
Social Support in Chronic Pain Scale
Time Frame: 3-month follow up
Social Support in Chronic Pain will be measured using Van Der Lugts' 6-item Social Support in Chronic Pain Scale. Total scores range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater levels of social support.
3-month follow up
Average Pain Intensity on the 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale
Time Frame: 3-month follow up
Pain intensity in the past 7 days will be measured on the numeric rating scale (NRS), the score ranges from 0-10, with zero indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst pain imaginable.
3-month follow up
Patient Belief About Treatment Efficacy on the Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Time Frame: 3-month follow up
Patient belief about treatment efficacy will be measured using a single item patient global impression of change (PGIC). Total score rates from 1 (very much worse) to 7 (very much improved)
3-month follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Maria Chao, DrPH, MPA, University of California, San Francisco

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 28, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 4, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 4, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 7, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 7, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 6, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 22-37078
  • 1R61MD018333 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data from the study will comply with NIH Helping to End Addiction Long term (HEAL) policies on data sharing, which will include depositing deidentified data in a data repository.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

to be determined based on NIH HEAL policies

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access to trial IPD can be requested by qualified researchers engaging in independent scientific research, and will be provided following review and approval of a research proposal and Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) and execution of a Data Sharing Agreement (DSA).

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain

Clinical Trials on group acupuncture

Subscribe