Effectiveness and Implementation of a Digital Intervention for Pediatric Chronic Pain Co-designed With Patients (Digital SPA)

December 5, 2025 updated by: Rocio de la Vega de Carranza, PhD, University of Malaga

Children and adolescents with chronic pain often lack a proper diagnosis and treatment. Research has shown that, if left untreated, it usually doesn't resolve and continues through adulthood.

The goal of this multi-phase study is to co-develop (with patients), test, and implement a smartphone app called "Digital Solution for Pain in Adolescents" (Digital SPA) which can provide pain management resources to children with chronic pain and their parents, preventing future disability.

Participants will: participate in individual and group interviews, respond to questionnaires online and try a smartphone app.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Phase 1) Focus groups with patients, parents and clinicians (n = 5-6 each) will inform about unmet pain care needs, and provide a starting point for co-designing the intervention.

Phase 2) Content creation and usability testing will be based on the results of Phase 1 and the theory-driven development will follow the latest available evidence and the World Health Organization guidelines on the management of chronic pain in children. The intervention will use validated psychological techniques (particularly Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy) focused on improving functioning by teaching pain coping skills, such as: relaxation, goal setting, sleep management, behavioral activation, self-management of negative thoughts and emotions, and communication skills.

Phase 3) Effectiveness and Implementation study. Participants (n = 195) will be adolescents 12-17 years old with chronic pain admitted into any of 6 large hospitals in Spain and one of their parents.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

195

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Almería
    • Barcelona
      • Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 08950
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Sant Joan de Déu
        • Contact:
    • Granada
      • Granada, Granada, Spain, 18014
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Materno Infantil Virgen de las Nieves
        • Contact:
    • Madrid
      • Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 28046
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital infantil del Hospital Universitario La Paz
        • Contact:
    • Murcia
    • Málaga
      • Málaga, Málaga, Spain, 29006

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adolescents age 12-17 years
  • Has had non-oncologic chronic pain for at least 3 months (e.g., abdominal pain, headache or musculoskeletal pain)
  • Has Internet access
  • One parent is willing to participate (and both give consent for their child to participate)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of a comorbid serious health condition (e.g., cancer)
  • Parent or child does not speak or read Spanish
  • Active psychosis or suicidal ideation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Digital SPA
A psychological intervention for chronic pain in adolescents administered using an app co-created with patients.
A psychological digital intervention for chronic pain in adolescents, based on evidence-based Acceptance and Commitment Therapy techniques. The intervention will be co-created with patients in a previous phase of the study, so the exact number or format of sessions and content has not been determined yet.
No Intervention: Usual Care
Participants assigned to this arm will receive usual care from their hospital.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Pain Interference
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (T1), Mid-treatment (T2; 4 weeks after T1), Post-treatment (T3; 8 weeks after T1) and 3-months follow-up (T4; 3 months after T3).
Spanish version of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) short version. Pain intensity scale scores range from from 0 to 10 , with higher scores indicating greater interference. Interference scores range from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater interference.
Pre-treatment (T1), Mid-treatment (T2; 4 weeks after T1), Post-treatment (T3; 8 weeks after T1) and 3-months follow-up (T4; 3 months after T3).
Global impression of change after treatment
Time Frame: Post-treatment (T3; 8 weeks after T1) and 3-months follow-up (T4; 3 months after T3).
11-point scale (0 to 10) with higher scores indicating greater impression of change.
Post-treatment (T3; 8 weeks after T1) and 3-months follow-up (T4; 3 months after T3).
Change in the number of visits to the Emergency Room (ER) due to pain
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (T1), Mid-treatment (T2; 4 weeks after T1), Post-treatment (T3; 8 weeks after T1) and 3-months follow-up (T4; 3 months after T3).
The number of visits to the ER due to pain during the follow-up period (T3 to T4; 3 months) will be compared with the three months before starting treatment (T1).
Pre-treatment (T1), Mid-treatment (T2; 4 weeks after T1), Post-treatment (T3; 8 weeks after T1) and 3-months follow-up (T4; 3 months after T3).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in pain readiness to change
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (T1), Mid-treatment (T2; 4 weeks after T1), Post-treatment (T3; 8 weeks after T1) and 3-months follow-up (T4; 3 months after T3).
Readiness to adopt a self-management approach to pain. The Spanish version of the Pain Stages of Change Questionnaire for Adolescents (PSoCQ-A). The Questionnaire has three scales: Pre-contemplation, Contemplation, and Action/Maintenance. Each scale is scored in a 1 to 5 Likert scale, with higher scores indicating a higher level of attitudes in that stage of change. The scale with the highest score indicates which stage the respondent is at.
Pre-treatment (T1), Mid-treatment (T2; 4 weeks after T1), Post-treatment (T3; 8 weeks after T1) and 3-months follow-up (T4; 3 months after T3).
Change in the dose of pain medication taken
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (T1), Mid-treatment (T2; 4 weeks after T1), Post-treatment (T3; 8 weeks after T1) and 3-months follow-up (T4; 3 months after T3).
The dose (eg. 25 mg per day) of pain medication taken will be recorded.
Pre-treatment (T1), Mid-treatment (T2; 4 weeks after T1), Post-treatment (T3; 8 weeks after T1) and 3-months follow-up (T4; 3 months after T3).
Change in the type of pain medication taken
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (T1), Mid-treatment (T2; 4 weeks after T1), Post-treatment (T3; 8 weeks after T1) and 3-months follow-up (T4; 3 months after T3).
The type (e.g. Non-steroid Anti-inflammatory Drugs, opioids) of pain medication taken will be recorded.
Pre-treatment (T1), Mid-treatment (T2; 4 weeks after T1), Post-treatment (T3; 8 weeks after T1) and 3-months follow-up (T4; 3 months after T3).
Change in Sleep
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (T1), Mid-treatment (T2; 4 weeks after T1), Post-treatment (T3; 8 weeks after T1) and 3-months follow-up (T4; 3 months after T3).

Sleep quality will be assessed with the Spanish version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, validated for adolescents (PSQI). Scores on 7 components range from 0 to 3, and are the summed (global score range 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating worse sleep quality).

Insomnia will be assessed with the Spanish version of the Adolescent Insomnia Questionnaire (AIQ). Total scores range from 0 to 52 with higher scores indicating more insomnia symptoms.

Pre-treatment (T1), Mid-treatment (T2; 4 weeks after T1), Post-treatment (T3; 8 weeks after T1) and 3-months follow-up (T4; 3 months after T3).
Adherence to treatment
Time Frame: From the moment the treatment app is downloaded (T1), to the completion of the treatment period (T3). Up to 10 weeks.
One measure of implementation will be adherence to the online intervention assessed collecting back-end data such as: number of log-ins or number of treatment sections completed.
From the moment the treatment app is downloaded (T1), to the completion of the treatment period (T3). Up to 10 weeks.
Change in Emotional Distress
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (T1), Mid-treatment (T2; 4 weeks after T1), Post-treatment (T3; 8 weeks after T1) and 3-months follow-up (T4; 3 months after T3).
The Spanish version of the Social Emotional Distress Scale-Secondary (SEDS-S) will be administered to assess general emotional distress (internalizing symptoms such as anxiety and depression) over the past month. The SEDS-S is a 10-item self-report questionnaire; items are rated from 1 ("Not at all true") to 4 ("Very true / Absolutely true"), with higher total scores indicating greater emotional distress.
Pre-treatment (T1), Mid-treatment (T2; 4 weeks after T1), Post-treatment (T3; 8 weeks after T1) and 3-months follow-up (T4; 3 months after T3).
Change in Functional Disability
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (T1), Mid-treatment (T2; 4 weeks after T1), Post-treatment (T3; 8 weeks after T1) and 3-months follow-up (T4; 3 months after T3).
Spanish version of CALI-9. Disability in functioning due to pain (activity limitations) is measured through 9 items to evaluate pain-related activity limitations in youth with chronic pain. Scores range from 1 = not very difficult; to 5 = extremely difficult. Higher scores indicating greater interference with children's activities.
Pre-treatment (T1), Mid-treatment (T2; 4 weeks after T1), Post-treatment (T3; 8 weeks after T1) and 3-months follow-up (T4; 3 months after T3).
Change in Pain Self-efficacy
Time Frame: Post-treatment (T3; 8 weeks after T1) and 3-months follow-up (T4; 3 months after T3).
Pain self-efficacy will be assessed using the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ). The PSEQ is a 10-item self-report measure that evaluates the extent to which individuals feel capable of functioning despite their pain. Items are rated on a 7-point scale from 0 ("not at all confident") to 6 ("completely confident"). Total scores range from 0 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater pain-related self-efficacy.
Post-treatment (T3; 8 weeks after T1) and 3-months follow-up (T4; 3 months after T3).
Psychological Flexibility and Inflexibility Processes
Time Frame: Pre-treatment (T1), Mid-treatment (T2; 4 weeks after T1), Post-treatment (T3; 8 weeks after T1) and 3-months follow-up (T4; 3 months after T3).
Psychological flexibility and inflexibility will be assessed using the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI). The MPFI includes subscales capturing both flexibility and inflexibility across six ACT processes. Items are rated on a 1 ("never true") to 6 ("always true") scale. Subscale scores are computed by summing item responses, with higher scores indicating greater levels of the corresponding process (higher flexibility or higher inflexibility). A global index of psychological flexibility will also be measured using the PsyFlex questionnaire. The PsyFlex consists of 6 items rated on a 1 ("very untrue of me") to 5 ("very true of me") scale. Total scores range from 6 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater psychological flexibility.
Pre-treatment (T1), Mid-treatment (T2; 4 weeks after T1), Post-treatment (T3; 8 weeks after T1) and 3-months follow-up (T4; 3 months after T3).
Satisfaction with treatment
Time Frame: Post-treatment (T3; 8 weeks after T1).
Usability and satisfaction with the intervention will be assessed using the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire (MAUQ). The MAUQ includes 18 items rated on a 1 ("strongly disagree") to 7 ("strongly agree") scale. Subscales assess ease of use, interface and satisfaction, and usefulness. Higher scores indicate greater usability and satisfaction with the digital intervention.
Post-treatment (T3; 8 weeks after T1).

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adverse Events (side effects)
Time Frame: Mid-treatment (T2; 4 weeks after T1), Post-treatment (T3; 8 weeks after T1) and 3-months follow-up (T4; 3 months after T3).
Adverse Events are not expected given the content of the treatment and its non-invasive nature, however, they will be assessed, recorded and controlled for in the analyses
Mid-treatment (T2; 4 weeks after T1), Post-treatment (T3; 8 weeks after T1) and 3-months follow-up (T4; 3 months after T3).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rocio de la Vega, PhD, University of Malaga

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 5, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 8, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 14, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 26, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 15, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain

Clinical Trials on Digital SPA

Subscribe