Neurofeedback Training's Efficiency for Attentionnal Performances (ENOCA)

Evaluation of Neurofeedback Training's Efficiency for the Optimization of Attentionnal Performances

We hypothesize 1) that an electroencephalographic (EEG) based neurofeedback training may improve attentional performances of healthy subjects, and 2) inter-individual variability might be explained by factors such as body awarness, sleep parameters and genetics of individuals.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Many jobs require high attentional performances that are maintained over time, which imply safety issues. Just like physicial performances of top athletes, it is possible to use a set of innovative methods and technologies to improve cognitive performances (attention, working memory, decision making… ), in particular with the help of brain training programs such as neurofeedback protocoles. Although neurofeedback training efficiency has been evaluated in many context (either with patients or healthy subjects), it is still a subject of debate. More specifically, inter-individual variability is far from beeing understood. We hypothesize 1) that an electroencephalographic (EEG) based neurofeedback training may improve attentional performances of healthy subjects, and 2) inter-individual variability might be explained by factors such as body awarness, sleep parameters and genetics of individuals.

  1. To demonstrate the efficiency of EEG neurofeedback (EEG-NFB) trainings versus a control group, we will compare the conflict monitoring score obtained with the Attentional Network Task (Reaction Times (RT) in ms of Incongruent trials minus Reaction Times of Congruent trials : RTincongruent - Rtcongruent). Our hypothesis is a reduction of the conflict monitoring scores after the EEG-NFB compared to baseline (before EEG-NFB), and a lower score for the EEG-NFB group compared to the control group.
  2. To decipher the different factors influencing EEG-NFB training efficacy, we will explore the inter-individual variability by assessing the body awarness (especially cardiac interoceptive accuracy with a counting task), sleep parameters (hypnogram, sleep power spectral activities) and genetic polymorphisms (DRD2, COMT, DAT1, PER3, ADA, ADORA2A, TNF-α).

The study design will be a controlled interventional protocol, double-blinded with parralel-arms (EEG-NFB vs Control) in healthy volunteers.

  • Prior informations will be given to individuals expressing an interest in this study.
  • During the inclusion visit, an investigator or a member of the research team will verbally reiterate the informations and answer any additional questions. The volunteer will be reminded of his/her rights in the contexte of research involving the human person.
  • After verifying volunteer's eligibility criteria, he/she will be asked to sign the consent form.
  • The rest of the visit will consist of filling out a health questionnaire. If any answer is positive, they will be received by a physician investigator who will carry out a medical examination.
  • Volunteers will have to fill out a sleep questionnaire.
  • At the end of the visit, biological samples for genotyping will be collected, and volunteers will be reminded that no DNA sample will be stored after genotyping.
  • Sleep/wake cycles will be home monitored with a wearable headset during 14 days : 7 days before the start of EEG-NFB training, and 7 during the EEG-NFB training.
  • Cognitive tests will be done each day of EEG-NFB training (or control) : Psychomotor Vigilance Task, Attentional Network Test, AX-Continuous Performance Test and a Heartbit Counting task. The cognitive test period will last 30 minutes.
  • EEG-NFB training (or control) will be done for 5 consecutive days, each session lasts 35 min (10 blocs of 3 min, and short breaks of 30 s). Each session will be precedeed and followed by a resting-state recording. The control group will perform a SHAM EEG-NFB.
  • Before the first session and after the last (5th) session, cortisol and α-amylase concentrations will be evaluated by saliva tests.
  • Before the session and after the last session, questionnaires evaluating body awarness will be filled out by volunteers.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

108

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • healthy male or female volunteers
  • aged between 18 yo and 50 yo.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • any pathological issues,
  • previous traumatic brain and/or auditive injuries,
  • volunteers having already experienced NFB trainings,
  • high tobacco consumers,
  • volunteers refusing genotyping.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Neurofeedback
1 week of cerebral training with a neurofeedback strategy based on increased alpha EEG activity
Neurofeedback training
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
1 week of cerebral training with a placebo strategy based on time increase of performance, without neurofeedback
Neurofeedback training

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Attentional performance
Time Frame: One week
the Attentional Network Task (Reaction Times (RT) in ms of Incongruent trials minus Reaction Times of Congruent trials : RTincongruent - Rtcongruent).
One week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sleep parameters
Time Frame: One week
Total sleep duration in minutes
One week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 25, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 20, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

June 29, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 29, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 20, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2023_ENOCA
  • 2022-A02306-37 (Other Identifier: IDRCB)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Attention-deficit

Clinical Trials on Neurofeedback

3
Subscribe