Neurofeedback Training (NFT) on Sleep Quality and Cognitive Function Performance Among HIV-infected Persons

March 24, 2024 updated by: Chen, Yen-Chin, National Cheng-Kung University Hospital

Construction and Evaluation of Neurofeedback Training (NFT) on Sleep Quality and Cognitive Function Performance Among HIV-infected Persons

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effects of NFT on sleep quality and cognitive-behavioral performance among HIV-infected patients, to use it as a reference for the construction of NFT as a clinical empirical treatment model for HIV-infected patients with sleep disturbance.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Detailed Description

This study will aim to evaluate the effects of NFT on sleep quality and neurocognitive performance among HIV-infected persons with sleep disturbance. A double-blind clinical randomized parallel trial will be enrolled in HIV-infected persons with sleep disturbance. We will exclude subjects with OSA. Random sampling by using a computer, and then we will be divided subjects into 2 groups. 30 people will be drawn into the experimental group and control group (sham). Two groups will be treated with NFT three times a week for at least four weeks. The vague distribution of this study will be handled by SNOSE (Sequentially Numbered, Opaque, Sealed Envelopes). Double-blind subjects include subjects, family members, outcome appraisers, and technologists to ensure the integrity of randomized controlled trials and blind assignment. The outcome indicators are sleep quality and the Chinese Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA). Treatment compliance, sample loss, and adverse event events will be monitored, and the analysis will be followed the principle of intention to treat. The pair student t or McNemar's test will use to test the effect of NFT on sleep quality and neurocognitive performances among HIV-infected persons.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Tainan, Taiwan, 704
        • National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • HIV-infected persons

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with central neural infections
  • Pregnant women
  • Drug or alcohol abuse

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group with neurofeedback training
The neurofeedback training system records the brain waves from the subject and converts the original brain wave signal into frequency energy through spectrum analysis. The system will help the subject to find self relax method for producing more alpha waves. Each person will arrange training three times a week for four weeks.
Neurofeedback training as a method is going to let the brain producing the alpha signal (8-13 Hz).
Sham Comparator: Group with shame neurofeedback training
In the shame group, the system is not feedback to the actual wave. Each person will arrange training three times a week for four weeks.
shame neurofeedback

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subjective sleep quality as assessed by Chinese version Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (CPSQI)
Time Frame: 1 month
Subjective sleep quality was measured by Chinese version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (CPSQI). A patient with a score of >=5 would be identified as poor sleep quality.
1 month
The length of minutes of total sleep time (TST) as assessed by the acti-watch
Time Frame: 1 month

This objective outcome measures by the acti-watch (Axivity, Newcastle, UK), which contains an accelerometer for detection of movement, produces a continuous electrical signal (voltage) when a participant wore the device for up to one month.

Total sleep time (TST): TST referred to as the true sleep period, is defined as the interval (within time in bed) from sleep onset to sleep offset.

1 month
The length of minutes of sleep onset latency (SOL) as assessed by the acti-watch
Time Frame: 1 month

This objective outcome measures by the acti-watch (Axivity, Newcastle, UK), which contains an accelerometer for detection of movement, produces a continuous electrical signal (voltage) when a participant wore the device.

Sleep onset latency (SOL): SOL refers to the number of minutes it took a subject to fall asleep. It is the number of minutes between lying down in bed and actually falling asleep.

1 month
The percentage of sleep efficiency (SE) as assessed by the acti-watch
Time Frame: 1 month

This objective outcome measures by the acti-watch (Axivity, Newcastle, UK), which contains an accelerometer for detection of movement, produces a continuous electrical signal (voltage) when a participant wore the device for up to one month.

Sleep efficiency (SE): SE is defined as the percentage of time spent asleep during the time in bed. SE is derived as follows: SE=(TST/time in bed)×100%.

1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cognitive performance as assessed by the International HIV dementia scale (IHDS)
Time Frame: 1 month
We will evaluate cognitive performance using International HIV dementia scale (IHDS). The maximum possible score is 12 points. A patient with a score of ≤10 should be evaluated further for possible HIV dementia.
1 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 4, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 14, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV Infections

Clinical Trials on Neurofeedback

3
Subscribe