Orange Park Out-of-Hospital Quality Improvement Study for Improving CMS Sepsis Core Measures

July 17, 2023 updated by: Orange Park Medical Center

The goal of this quality improvement study is to measure the impact of incorporation of a manual rapid fluid infuser (RFI) for intravenous crystalloid infusion in patients with suspected sepsis in the prehospital interval.

The main question[s] it aims to answer are:

  • Does the intervention affect the timeliness of fluid administration?
  • Does the intervention affect CMS sepsis bundle care measure compliance?
  • Does the intervention affect processes and outcomes of care?
  • Are there any adverse effects?

Researchers will compare this intervention to use of more conventional gravity or pressure-infusion bag crystalloid infusion.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

66

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Orange Park, Florida, United States, 32073
        • Orange Park Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients meeting sepsis alert criteria who were transported to the study hospital's emergency department by one of the four rescue units involved in the study. Sepsis alert defined as patient has suspected infection and two or more of the following: (a) temperature > 38° C (100.4° F) or < 36° C (96.8° F), (b) respiratory rate > 20 breaths / minute or end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) ≤ 25 mmHg, or (c) heart rate > 90 beats / minute

Exclusion Criteria:

  • prehospital trauma
  • prehospital cardiac arrest prior to signaling sepsis alert
  • interfacility transfer
  • emergency transport from medical facility (e.g., medical office or clinic)
  • intervention by medical practitioner before emergency medical services arrival
  • do not resuscitate order in place

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: After-phase: Incorporation of Rapid Fluid Infusion Device in Prehospital Suspected Sepsis Protocol
Modified protocol specifying intravenous crystalloid infusion Rapid Fluid Infusion Device. The protocol states that for patients meeting the sepsis alert criterion, EMS will provide basic medical care, oxygen, a 12-lead electrocardiogram, attempt placement of an IV catheter and initiate administration of 30mL/kg of fluids.
Modified protocol specifying intravenous crystalloid infusion Rapid Fluid Infusion Device. The protocol states that for patients meeting the sepsis alert criterion, EMS will provide basic medical care, oxygen, a 12-lead electrocardiogram, attempt placement of an IV catheter and initiate administration of 30mL/kg of fluids.
Active Comparator: Before phase: Conventional Prehospital Suspected Sepsis Protocol
Conventional protocol employing intravenous crystalloid infusion via gravity or pressurized-bag. The protocol states that for patients meeting the sepsis alert criterion, EMS will provide basic medical care, oxygen, a 12-lead electrocardiogram, attempt placement of an IV catheter and initiate administration of 30mL/kg of fluids.
Conventional protocol employing intravenous crystalloid infusion via gravity or pressurized-bag. The protocol states that for patients meeting the sepsis alert criterion, EMS will provide basic medical care, oxygen, a 12-lead electrocardiogram, attempt placement of an IV catheter and initiate administration of 30mL/kg of fluids.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage compliance with the CMS 3-hour sepsis bundle criterion (SEP-1) for patients with suspected sepsis
Time Frame: Assessed at 3 hours after ED arrival
As defined according to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Specifications Manual for Hospital Inpatient Quality Measures, version 5.9. "Time of presentation" or "time-zero" was defined as the time of triage in the Emergency Department. All patients enrolled in the study were assessed for measure compliance, without application of measure inclusion/exclusion criteria.
Assessed at 3 hours after ED arrival

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage achievement of 30mL/kg crystalloid infusion for hypotension or lactate level > 4 mmol/L at 1 hour
Time Frame: Assessed at 1 hour after ED arrival
Dichotomous measure of whether infusion volume was met, based on sum of prehospital and ED-based crystalloid fluid infusion
Assessed at 1 hour after ED arrival
Total volume of intravenous crystalloid infused by time of ED arrival
Time Frame: During the 3 hours prior to ED arrival, while under care by EMS.
During the 3 hours prior to ED arrival, while under care by EMS.
Total volume of intravenous crystalloid infused by 1 hour after ED arrival
Time Frame: Assessed at 1 hour after ED arrival
Assessed at 1 hour after ED arrival
Total volume of intravenous crystalloid infused by 3 hours after ED arrival
Time Frame: Assessed at 3 hours after ED arrival
Assessed at 3 hours after ED arrival
Total volume of intravenous crystalloid infused, in the ED, by 1 hour after ED arrival
Time Frame: Assessed at 1 hour after ED arrival
Assessed at 1 hour after ED arrival
Total volume of intravenous crystalloid infused, in the ED, by 3 hours after ED arrival
Time Frame: Assessed at 3 hours after ED arrival
Assessed at 3 hours after ED arrival
Percentage of study participants receiving any intensive care unit care
Time Frame: Through discharge from index acute-care episode, up to 6 months
Through discharge from index acute-care episode, up to 6 months
Percentage of study participants with admission disposition during index ED visit
Time Frame: Through discharge from index acute-care episode, up to 6 months
Through discharge from index acute-care episode, up to 6 months
Percentage of enrollees receiving any specified life-support interventions in the first 24 hours from ED arrival
Time Frame: Assessed at 24 hours after ED arrival
Specified life-support interventions were mechanical ventilation, vasopressor use, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, surgical intervention.
Assessed at 24 hours after ED arrival
Percentage of enrollees experiencing in-hospital death
Time Frame: Through discharge from index acute-care episode, up to 6 months
Through discharge from index acute-care episode, up to 6 months
Total length of stay in ED
Time Frame: Through discharge from index acute-care episode, up to 6 months
Operationalized as time difference between ED clinician's documented disposition time and the patient's arrival time.
Through discharge from index acute-care episode, up to 6 months
Total length of stay in hospital
Time Frame: Through discharge from index acute-care episode, up to 6 months
Among those admitted to the hospital as the disposition of their index ED visit.
Through discharge from index acute-care episode, up to 6 months
Total length of stay in intensive care unit
Time Frame: Through discharge from index acute-care episode, up to 6 months
Through discharge from index acute-care episode, up to 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Martin P Wegman, MD, PhD, Orange Park Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

August 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 22, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

July 27, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 27, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 17, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe