Umbilical Mesenchymal Stromal Cells as Cellular Immunotherapy for Septic Shock (UC-CISSII)

December 4, 2024 updated by: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Umbilical Mesenchymal Stromal Cells as Cellular Immunotherapy for Septic Shock: A Multi-Center, Double Blind, Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial

Septic shock is associated with substantial burden in terms of both mortality and morbidity for survivors of this illness. Pre-clinical sepsis studies suggest that mesenchymal stem (stromal) cells (MSCs) modulate inflammation, enhance pathogen clearance and tissue repair and reduce death. Our team has completed a Phase I dose escalation and safety clinical trial that evaluated MSCs in patients with septic shock. The Cellular Immunotherapy for Septic Shock Phase I (CISS) trial established that MSCs appear safe and that a randomized controlled trial (RCT) is feasible. Based on these data, the investigators have planned a phase II RCT (UC-CISS II) at several Canadian academic centres which will evaluate intermediate measures of clinical efficacy (primary outcome), as well as biomarkers, safety, clinical outcome measures, and a health economic analysis (secondary outcomes).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Septic shock is a devastating illness and the most severe form of infection seen in the intensive care unit (ICU). It is characterized by cardiovascular collapse, failure of organs and is common with severe repercussions including a mortality of 20-40%. Survivors suffer long-term impairment in function and reduced quality of life (QOL). Despite decades of research examining different immune therapies, none has proven successful and supportive care remains the mainstay of therapy, at a cost of approximately 4-billion dollars in Canada annually. MSCs represent a potentially novel treatment for sepsis because in animal models, MSCs have been shown to modulate the immune system, increase pathogen clearance, restore organ function, and reduce death.

The Phase II multi-centre double blind Umbilical Cord Cellular Immunotherapy for Septic Shock RCT (UC-CISS II) will examine intermediate measures of clinical efficacy (primary outcome) as well as biomarkers, safety, clinical outcome measures, and a health economic analysis (secondary outcomes). To answer these aims, UC-CISS II will randomize 296 patients who are admitted to the ICU with septic shock to 300 million cryopreserved, allogeneic, umbilical cord-derived MSCs or placebo across several Canadian academic centres over approximately 2.5 years.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

296

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Josee Champagne
  • Phone Number: 73836 613-737-8899
  • Email: UCCISS@ohri.ca

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H 8L6
        • Recruiting
        • The Ottawa Hospital (General Campus)
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Lauralyn McIntyre, MD
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1Y 4E9
        • Recruiting
        • The Ottawa Hospital (Civic Campus)
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Lauralyn McIntyre, MD
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

A participant must meet all the following inclusion criteria at time of randomization to be eligible:

  1. At least 18 years of age AND
  2. Requirement for admission to the intensive care unit AND
  3. Index admission to the intensive care unit AND
  4. Cardiovascular organ failure for at least 1 consecutive hour defined by the requirement of at least 5 mcg/min of norepinephrine or 100 mcg/min of phenylephrine or 0.03 U/min vasopressin AND
  5. Clinician impression that cardiovascular organ failure is related to infection AND
  6. There is at least 1 other acute organ failure according to modified individual Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Scores within 24 hours of meeting Cardiovascular organ failure defined by:

    1. Respiratory failure: invasive or non-invasive mechanical ventilation with a positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) >/= 5 cm H2O and a partial pressure of oxygen/fractional inspired oxygen concentration (P/F ratio </= 200), OR high-flow nasal canula oxygen therapy (minimum total flow rate of 30 lpm and 40% FiO2); OR
    2. Hematological failure: platelet count of </= 100 X 10^9/L OR
    3. Acute kidney injury: acute renal insufficiency with a creatinine of >/= 200 umol/L, or the requirement for new renal replacement therapy, or for participants with known chronic renal failure but not on dialysis, a 50% increase in their baseline creatinine concentration OR
    4. Organ hypoperfusion: a lactate >/= 4 mmol/L

Acute organ failures that meet eligibility criteria must not have been present for greater than 48 hours prior to meeting the eligibility criteria.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients will be excluded if they have at least one of the following at time of randomization:

  1. Another form of shock (cardiogenic, hypovolemic, obstructive) OR
  2. History of known chronic pulmonary hypertension with a WHO functional class of IV OR
  3. History of severe chronic pulmonary disease requiring home oxygen OR
  4. History of severe chronic cardiac disease including congestive heart failure or valvular dysfunction with a New York Heart Association Functional class IV or severe chronic ischemic heart disease with a Canadian Cardiovascular Society angina class score IV OR
  5. History of severe chronic liver disease (Child-Pugh Class C or model for end stage liver disease (MELD) Score >= 15) OR
  6. Malignancy in previous 1 year (excluding resolved non-melanoma skin cancer) OR
  7. Treating physician impression that death is imminent within the 12 hours after meeting eligibility criteria OR
  8. Pregnant or lactating OR
  9. Family or patient not committed to aggressive care

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (UC-MSCs)
Intravenous infusion of 300 million allogeneic, cryopreserved, umbilical cord-derived human mesenchymal stromal cells
Intravenous infusion of 300 million allogeneic, cryopreserved, umbilical cord-derived human mesenchymal stromal cells
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Intravenous infusion of placebo, with excipients
Intravenous infusion of placebo, with excipients

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Days free from mechanical ventilation and/or vasopressors and/or renal replacement therapy
Time Frame: Through to 28 days post-randomization
The number of days free from each of these support measures
Through to 28 days post-randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Biomarkers - Vascular permeability
Time Frame: At baseline, 1, 3 and 7 days post-randomization
Markers of vascular permeability (ex: Angpt1 and 2)
At baseline, 1, 3 and 7 days post-randomization
Biomarkers - Acute kidney injury
Time Frame: At baseline, 1, 3 and 7 days post-randomization
Markers of acute kidney injury (ex: Urine TIMP2-IGFBP7, IL-18)
At baseline, 1, 3 and 7 days post-randomization
Biomarkers - Muscle weakness
Time Frame: At baseline, 1, 3 and 7 days post-randomization
Markers of muscle weakness (ex: micro RNA [miR] miR-181a, growth differentiation Factor-15)
At baseline, 1, 3 and 7 days post-randomization
Biomarkers - Pathogen clearance
Time Frame: At baseline, 1, 3 and 7 days post-randomization
Mechanisms related to pathogen clearance (ex: cathelicidin, LL-37)
At baseline, 1, 3 and 7 days post-randomization
Biomarkers - Inflammatory mediators and cytokines
Time Frame: At baseline, 1, 3 and 7 days post-randomization
Pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators and cytokines (ex: CRP, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-1B and IL1-RA)
At baseline, 1, 3 and 7 days post-randomization
Safety - Adverse Event
Time Frame: Through to 7 days post-randomization
Safety of study treatment administration, examined for the occurrence of any adverse event (which requires treatment or intervention) regardless of relationship to study treatment
Through to 7 days post-randomization
Safety - Serious and Unexpected Adverse Events
Time Frame: Through to 28 days post-randomization
Safety of study treatment administration, examined for the occurrence of serious and unexpected adverse events that are considered possibly or related to the study treatment
Through to 28 days post-randomization
Safety - Expected Adverse Events
Time Frame: Through to 28 days post-randomization
Safety of study treatment administration, examined for the occurrence of expected adverse events (including nosocomial infections, acute coronary syndrome, tachy and bradyarrhythmia, clinically important bleeding, ARDS and thrombotic/thromboembolic events)
Through to 28 days post-randomization
Mortality
Time Frame: In ICU (through study completion, up to 1 year), in hospital (through study completion, up to 1 year), 28 days, 90 days, 6 months and 1 year post-randomization
All-cause mortality
In ICU (through study completion, up to 1 year), in hospital (through study completion, up to 1 year), 28 days, 90 days, 6 months and 1 year post-randomization
Length of ICU Stay (in days)
Time Frame: Number of elapsed days from admission until ICU discharge, up to 1 year
Time in ICU
Number of elapsed days from admission until ICU discharge, up to 1 year
Length of Hospital Stay (in days)
Time Frame: Number of elapsed days from admission until hospital discharge, up to 1 year
Time in hospital
Number of elapsed days from admission until hospital discharge, up to 1 year
Hospital Re-Admissions
Time Frame: At 28 days, 90 days and 1 year post-randomization
Re-admission to any hospital
At 28 days, 90 days and 1 year post-randomization
ICU Re-Admissions
Time Frame: During index study hospital admission (through study completion, up to 1 year)
Re-admission to ICU during study hospital admission
During index study hospital admission (through study completion, up to 1 year)
Organ Failure Rates
Time Frame: Through to 90 days post-randomization
Organ failure rates (using Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score), described individually and in composite
Through to 90 days post-randomization
Days free from mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: Through to 90 days post-randomization
Number of days free from mechanical ventilation
Through to 90 days post-randomization
Days free from vasopressors
Time Frame: Through to 90 days post-randomization
Number of days free from vasopressor agents
Through to 90 days post-randomization
Days free from renal replacement therapy
Time Frame: Through to 90 days post-randomization
Number of days free from renal replacement therapy
Through to 90 days post-randomization
Patient Reported Outcomes - Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
Time Frame: At 30 days, 6 months and 1 year post-randomization
FIM scores ranging from 18 to 126 (where the higher the score, the more independent the patient is)
At 30 days, 6 months and 1 year post-randomization
Patient Reported Outcomes - Short Form Survey-36 (SF-36)
Time Frame: At 30 days, 6 months and 1 year post-randomization
SF-36 scores ranging from 0 to 100 (with higher scores indicating better health status)
At 30 days, 6 months and 1 year post-randomization
Health Economic Analysis
Time Frame: Through to 28 days post-randomization
A cost-utility analysis of MSCs compared to placebo from a perspective of Canada's publicly funded health care system will be conducted
Through to 28 days post-randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lauralyn McIntyre, MD, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 14, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 12, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 22, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe