Short Versus Long Intramedullary Nails in the Treatment of Proximal Femur Metastasis.

August 15, 2023 updated by: National Taiwan University Hospital

Compare the Efficacy of Long-nailed and Short-nailed Fixation for Proximal Femur Metastasis - a Non-inferior Randomized Controlled Trial

The goal of this interventional randomized controlled trial is to compare the clinical outcomes in treating extremities pathological fractures (fractures of limbs caused by metastatic tumors) or impending pathological fractures with short or long intramedullary nails. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. What is the rate of developing new distant metastasis of the operated extremities?
  2. Does treating extremities (impending) pathological fractures with long intramedullary nails have lower or similar reoperation rate than the short nails?
  3. Are there any differences when comparing the surgical-related complication, functional outcomes and life quality assessment between treating extremities (impending) pathological fractures with long or short intramedullary nails.

Participants who meet surgical indication will be randomized into either the long or short intramedullary nail group after informed consent. The patient will receive bone fixation with the corresponding prosthesis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Participants will be randomized into either long or short intramedullary nail groups. Participants in the long intramedullary nail group will be fixed with a longer intramedullary nail (defined as greater than 2/3 of the patient's femur) for proximal femoral (impending) pathological fractures, while patients in the short intramedullary nail group will be fixed with a shorter intramedullary nail (defined as less than 2/3 of the patient's femur) for proximal femoral (impending) pathological fractures. Follow-up will be performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery to analyze the patient's function, blood sampling values, and imaging follow-up. The functional capacity will be evaluated by PROMIS questionnaire.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Femur (impending) pathological fracture that is suitable for intramedullary nail fixation as determined by the physician
  • Patient is willing to participate in this clinical trial and cooperate with follow-up

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The patient has a more appropriate treatment alternative to single intramedullary nail fixation as determined by the multidisciplinary decision, such as,

    • The metastatic lesions involved the femur head
    • The metastatic lesions involved the pelvis
    • The metastatic lesions compromised the greater or lesser trochanter to a certain extent that arthroplasty was indicated
    • The metastatic lesions involved/occurred more distal than the intertrochanteric line
  • There are justified, clinically significant rationales that either long or short intramedullary nails be a more appropriate treatment during pre-operative assessment
  • The patient has imaging-confirmed distant femoral metastases before treatment
  • Patient has renal cell carcinoma or sarcoma
  • Patient is unable to cooperate with follow-up or to understand the trial protocol
  • Patient is unable to communicate in Chinese

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Short intramedullary nails
The patients receives bone fixation with short intramedullary nails for extremity metastases.
Intramedullary nailing is a method of internal fixation used to treat fractures. An intramedullary nail is a metal rod forced into the marrow canal of a bone to stabilize and align fractures. Participants in this group will be fixed with a shorter intramedullary nail (defined as defined as less than 2/3 of the patient's femur) for proximal femoral (impending) pathological fractures.
Active Comparator: Long intramedullary nails
The patients receives bone fixation with long intramedullary nails for extremity metastases.
Intramedullary nailing is a method of internal fixation used to treat fractures. An intramedullary nail is a metal rod forced into the marrow canal of a bone to stabilize and align fractures. Participants in this group will be fixed with a longer intramedullary nail (defined as greater than 2/3 of the patient's femur) for proximal femoral (impending) pathological fractures.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reoperation rate
Time Frame: Up to 1 year after the intervention
Percentage of patients receiving revision surgery within 1 year after the intervention. The primary outcome should be compared using non-inferior tests. The non-inferior margin was pre-specified at 25.4%.
Up to 1 year after the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cardiopulmonary complication rate within 30 days after the intervention
Time Frame: Up to 30 days after the intervention
Cardiopulmonary complication includes the following events developing within 30 days after the intervention: O2 desaturation, shock, embolic event, or coma and death.
Up to 30 days after the intervention
Mortality rate at 1,3,6,12 months after the intervention
Time Frame: At 1,3,6,12 months after the intervention
Percentage of demise at 1,3,6,12 months after the intervention
At 1,3,6,12 months after the intervention
Percentage of of participants with distant femoral metastasis
Time Frame: Up to 1 year after the intervention
Newly formed metastatic lesions on the same limb distant to the operation site within 1 year after the intervention
Up to 1 year after the intervention
Change from baseline in functional outcome on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 scoring at 1,3,6,12 months after the intervention
Time Frame: At 1,3,6,12 months after the intervention
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is a set of person-centered measures that evaluates physical, mental, and social health in adults and children. It's used to measure symptoms and other aspects of health status in a wide variety of chronic diseases. PROMIS-29 is a particular version of this system that covers multiple domains of health and function. It consists of 29 items in total, spanning seven domains: physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and pain interference. Each domain has four questions, with the exception of the pain interference domain, which has five. Each question is scored from 1-5, the higher score indicates better function or quality of life. The sum of the PROMIS results in the raw score, which lies between 4 and 20. There's also a single question evaluating pain intensity, as assessed by pain intensity numeric rating scale.
At 1,3,6,12 months after the intervention
Cost-effectiveness analysis
Time Frame: Up to 2 year after the intervention
Utility comparison using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29) questionnaire
Up to 2 year after the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Hsiang Chieh Hsieh, MD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu branch

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 31, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 9, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 18, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bone Metastases

Clinical Trials on Internal fixation with short intramedullary nails

Subscribe