- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05969470
Short Versus Long Intramedullary Nails in the Treatment of Proximal Femur Metastasis.
Compare the Efficacy of Long-nailed and Short-nailed Fixation for Proximal Femur Metastasis - a Non-inferior Randomized Controlled Trial
The goal of this interventional randomized controlled trial is to compare the clinical outcomes in treating extremities pathological fractures (fractures of limbs caused by metastatic tumors) or impending pathological fractures with short or long intramedullary nails. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- What is the rate of developing new distant metastasis of the operated extremities?
- Does treating extremities (impending) pathological fractures with long intramedullary nails have lower or similar reoperation rate than the short nails?
- Are there any differences when comparing the surgical-related complication, functional outcomes and life quality assessment between treating extremities (impending) pathological fractures with long or short intramedullary nails.
Participants who meet surgical indication will be randomized into either the long or short intramedullary nail group after informed consent. The patient will receive bone fixation with the corresponding prosthesis.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Hsiang Chieh Hsieh, MD
- Phone Number: +886 972654075
- Email: D08528020@ntu.edu.tw
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Femur (impending) pathological fracture that is suitable for intramedullary nail fixation as determined by the physician
- Patient is willing to participate in this clinical trial and cooperate with follow-up
Exclusion Criteria:
The patient has a more appropriate treatment alternative to single intramedullary nail fixation as determined by the multidisciplinary decision, such as,
- The metastatic lesions involved the femur head
- The metastatic lesions involved the pelvis
- The metastatic lesions compromised the greater or lesser trochanter to a certain extent that arthroplasty was indicated
- The metastatic lesions involved/occurred more distal than the intertrochanteric line
- There are justified, clinically significant rationales that either long or short intramedullary nails be a more appropriate treatment during pre-operative assessment
- The patient has imaging-confirmed distant femoral metastases before treatment
- Patient has renal cell carcinoma or sarcoma
- Patient is unable to cooperate with follow-up or to understand the trial protocol
- Patient is unable to communicate in Chinese
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Short intramedullary nails
The patients receives bone fixation with short intramedullary nails for extremity metastases.
|
Intramedullary nailing is a method of internal fixation used to treat fractures.
An intramedullary nail is a metal rod forced into the marrow canal of a bone to stabilize and align fractures.
Participants in this group will be fixed with a shorter intramedullary nail (defined as defined as less than 2/3 of the patient's femur) for proximal femoral (impending) pathological fractures.
|
|
Active Comparator: Long intramedullary nails
The patients receives bone fixation with long intramedullary nails for extremity metastases.
|
Intramedullary nailing is a method of internal fixation used to treat fractures.
An intramedullary nail is a metal rod forced into the marrow canal of a bone to stabilize and align fractures.
Participants in this group will be fixed with a longer intramedullary nail (defined as greater than 2/3 of the patient's femur) for proximal femoral (impending) pathological fractures.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Reoperation rate
Time Frame: Up to 1 year after the intervention
|
Percentage of patients receiving revision surgery within 1 year after the intervention.
The primary outcome should be compared using non-inferior tests.
The non-inferior margin was pre-specified at 25.4%.
|
Up to 1 year after the intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiopulmonary complication rate within 30 days after the intervention
Time Frame: Up to 30 days after the intervention
|
Cardiopulmonary complication includes the following events developing within 30 days after the intervention: O2 desaturation, shock, embolic event, or coma and death.
|
Up to 30 days after the intervention
|
|
Mortality rate at 1,3,6,12 months after the intervention
Time Frame: At 1,3,6,12 months after the intervention
|
Percentage of demise at 1,3,6,12 months after the intervention
|
At 1,3,6,12 months after the intervention
|
|
Percentage of of participants with distant femoral metastasis
Time Frame: Up to 1 year after the intervention
|
Newly formed metastatic lesions on the same limb distant to the operation site within 1 year after the intervention
|
Up to 1 year after the intervention
|
|
Change from baseline in functional outcome on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 scoring at 1,3,6,12 months after the intervention
Time Frame: At 1,3,6,12 months after the intervention
|
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is a set of person-centered measures that evaluates physical, mental, and social health in adults and children.
It's used to measure symptoms and other aspects of health status in a wide variety of chronic diseases.
PROMIS-29 is a particular version of this system that covers multiple domains of health and function.
It consists of 29 items in total, spanning seven domains: physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, ability to participate in social roles and activities, and pain interference.
Each domain has four questions, with the exception of the pain interference domain, which has five.
Each question is scored from 1-5, the higher score indicates better function or quality of life.
The sum of the PROMIS results in the raw score, which lies between 4 and 20.
There's also a single question evaluating pain intensity, as assessed by pain intensity numeric rating scale.
|
At 1,3,6,12 months after the intervention
|
|
Cost-effectiveness analysis
Time Frame: Up to 2 year after the intervention
|
Utility comparison using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-29 (PROMIS-29) questionnaire
|
Up to 2 year after the intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Hsiang Chieh Hsieh, MD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Hsin-Chu branch
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 202301173DINA
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Bone Metastases
-
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterRecruiting
-
University of UtahRecruitingBone MetastasesUnited States
-
University of CalgaryNot yet recruitingBone Metastases | Spine Metastases | Bone LesionCanada
-
Shanghai 6th People's HospitalNot yet recruitingBone Metastases
-
IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria di NegrarRecruiting
-
Suzhou Suncadia Biopharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.CompletedPatients With Bone MetastasesChina
-
Varian, a Siemens Healthineers CompanyActive, not recruitingBone Metastases in the ThoraxUnited States
-
Luye Pharma Group Ltd.RecruitingBone Metastases From Solid TumorsChina
-
Shanghai JMT-Bio Inc.CompletedBone Metastases From Solid TumorsChina
-
Shandong Cancer Hospital and InstituteRecruitingBone Metastases in Subjects With Advanced CancerChina
Clinical Trials on Internal fixation with short intramedullary nails
-
Zimmer BiometRecruiting
-
Christian CandrianRecruiting
-
University of California, San FranciscoOrthopaedic Trauma Association; Muhimbili Orthopaedic Institute; Orthopaedic...Completed
-
Ankara UniversityRecruitingMetastatic Cancer | Bone Metastases | Pathologic FractureTurkey
-
University of Massachusetts, WorcesterNot yet recruiting
-
Pei-Yuan Lee, MDAeon Biotechnology CorporationUnknownFemoral Shaft Fracture | Bone MarrowTaiwan
-
Siping Central People's HospitalCompleted
-
Fundación Universidad Católica de Valencia San...CompletedPertrochanteric Fracture of Femur | Unstable Throchanteric Hip FracturesSpain
-
University of CalgaryCanadian Orthopaedic Trauma Society; Canadian Orthopaedic Research Legacy; Calgary... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingTrauma | Surgery | Fracture | Orthopedic | Ulna FractureCanada, United Kingdom