Denervation for Osteoarthritis in the PIP-joint Efficacy Study (DOPS)

November 27, 2024 updated by: Elin Swärd, Karolinska Institutet

Denervation for Osteoarthritis in the PIP-joint Efficacy Study (DOPS), a Randomized Controlled Trial

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the effects of a surgical and a non-surgical treatment method in patients with osteoarthritis in the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Are the treatments effective?
  • Is the surgical treatment more effective than the non-surgical treatment? Participants will receive surgical treatment (PIP joint denervation) or non surgical treatment (patient education plus exercise).

Researchers will compare the non-surgical and surgical groups to see if pain, patient-reported function, quality of life, movement and grip strength differs between the groups.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a parallel group, two-arm, randomized, controlled trial comparing the effects of surgical denevation to patient education plus exercise in patients with symptomatic PIP joint osteoarthritis.

The research questions are:

  1. Does any of the treatments denervation of the PIP-joint and patient education plus exercise decrease pain, improve patient-reported outcomes, grip strength and range of motion (ROM) in PIP-joint osteoarthritis?
  2. Does denervation of the PIP-joint decrease pain, and improve patient-reported outcomes grip strength and ROM more effectively than patient education plus exercise for PIP-joint osteoarthritis?

Participants will be randomly assigned (1:1) to receive surgical denervation of the PIP-joint or education plus exercise. A block randomization scheme with a fixed block size of 10 will be used. Patients will be stratified according to gender. Sealed opaque envelopes will be used and data analysts will be masked for treatment allocation.

Assesments will be made at inclusion, and after 3, 6 and 12 months. The studys primary enpoint is 12 months after intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Stockholm, Sweden
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Hand Surgery, Södersjukhuset
        • Contact:
          • Elin Swärd, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years.
  • Chronic symptomatic osteoarthritis in the PIP-joint.
  • Radiological signs of osteoarthritis on posteroanterior and lateral radiographs assessed by the Kellgren-Lawrence classification (grade II-IV) (Kellgren & Lawrence, 1957).
  • Clinical signs of PIP-joint arthritis.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inflammatory arthritis.
  • Ongoing infection in the hand.
  • Inability to co-operate with the follow-up protocol.
  • Intra-articular glucocorticoid, PRP or Hyaluronic acid injections in the affected joint less than 3 months prior to enrollment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Surgical treatment
PIP joint denervation is performed through a volar approach.
Surgical denervation of the PIP joint
Active Comparator: Non-surgical treatment
An education and exercise program.
An education plus exercise program

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain on load (change baseline to -12 months)
Time Frame: 0-12 months
Pain (Numerical Rating Scale, 0-100 points, 100 is a worse outcome)
0-12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain at rest (change baseline to -3, -6, -12 months)
Time Frame: 0-12 months
Pain (Numerical Rating Scale, 0-100 points, 100 is a worse outcome)
0-12 months
HQ8 (8-item patient questionnaire) change baseline to -3, -6, 12 months
Time Frame: 0-12 months
A questionnaire used by Swedish Healthcare Quality Registry for hand surgery (HAKIR), 0-100 points, 100 is a worse outcome.
0-12 months
PRWHE (Patient Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation) change baseline to -3, 6, 12 months
Time Frame: 0-12 months
A questionnaire that measures hand/wrist function (0-100 points, 100 is a worse outcome)
0-12 months
EQ5D-5L change baseline to -3, -6, -12 months
Time Frame: 0-12 months
A questionnaire that measures quality of life (0-1 point, 0 is a worse outcome).
0-12 months
Complications
Time Frame: 0-12 months
2PD (Two point discrimination, 0-15mm, 15 indicating a worse outcome)
0-12 months
Complications
Time Frame: 0-12 months
Mini Sollerman (0-12 points, 12 indicating a better outcome)
0-12 months
Complications
Time Frame: 0-12 months
Infection (clinical evaluation, positive cultures, need for antibiotics)
0-12 months
Additional treatment
Time Frame: 0-12 months
Need for further surgery/treatment
0-12 months
Objective function change baseline to -3, -6, -12 months
Time Frame: 0-12 months
Range of motion (goniometer with 5 degrees interval)
0-12 months
Objective function change baseline to -3, -6, -12 months
Time Frame: 0-12 months
grip strength (hydraulic hand dynamometer, kilograms)
0-12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Elin Sward, MD, PhD, Department of Hand Surgery Sodersjukhuset and Karolinska Institutet

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 25, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 15, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 15, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 29, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 31, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

August 8, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 2, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • DOPS

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe