Safely Reduce Cystoscopic Evaluations for Hematuria Patients (SeARCH)

August 30, 2023 updated by: J.L. Boormans, MD PhD, Erasmus Medical Center
The SeARCH-trial assess the clinical impact of a molecular urine test as a 'urine-first' strategy in the diagnostic workup of patients presenting with microscopic hematuria.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Microscopic hematuria (MH) can be a sign of an underlying disease, including malignancy of the urinary tract, and is reason for referral to a urology clinic. The current standard diagnostic workup for MH patients includes visual inspection of the bladder by cystoscopy and upper tract imaging to rule out the presence of a tumor in the urinary tract. However, the a priori risk of cancer in patients with MH is only 2-5%. Consequently, 95% of MH patients unnecessarily undergo invasive procedures, which are: I) uncomfortable and stressful for patients, II) has a significant impact on limited available (financial) resources and III) a CT scan is accompanied by exposure to ionizing radiation.

Previously we developed a molecular urine assay to detect urinary tract cancer in hematuria patients that had robust diagnostic performance; a negative predictive value >99%, sensitivity, and specificity >90%. The SeARCH-trial evaluates the clinical impact of a urine assay as a 'urine-first' strategy, meaning that only patients with an abnormal urine test results undergo invasive diagnostics. In this multicenter stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial we compare clinical outcomes by using a 'urine-first' strategy to 'care-as-usual', which is a cystoscopy and upper tract imaging in all patients presenting with MH. In addition, we assess patients' preferences, patients reported outcome measurements, and healthcare costs to show that a 'urine-first' strategy improves patients' quality of life and results in a more appropriate use of limited available resources.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3015GD
        • Recruiting
        • SeARCH-trial Pijpers
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • O.M. Pijpers, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Microscopically confirmed microscopic hematuria of voided urine defined as ≥3 erythrocytes per high power field
  • Male patients ≥40 years
  • Female patients ≥50 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of urothelial bladder- or urinary tract cancer
  • Presence of macroscopic (visible) hematuria
  • Woman who is or may be pregnant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Care-as-usual
In the ''care-as-usual'' arm, all patients undergo 'care-as-usual', i.e. a cystoscopy and upper tract imaging (ultrasound or CT-scan)
Experimental: 'Urine-first' strategy
In the intervention arm, the urine test is used to triage patients for a diagnostic workup ('urine-first' strategy). Only patients with an abnormal test result undergo cystoscopy and upper tract imaging.
Only patients with an abnormal urine test result undergo a diagnostic workup, i.e. cystoscopy and upper-tract imaging.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The primary aim of the SeARCH-trial is to assess the clinical impact of implementing a molecular urinary assay as a 'urine-first' strategy, in the diagnostic workup of patients presenting with microscopic hematuria.
Time Frame: 1 year
The net benefit is defined as the proportion of patients who were diagnose with urinary tract cancer within 1 year after initial diagnostic work-up in the population (true positives) subtracted by the proportion of patients that underwent diagnostic evaluations without an abnormal finding (false positives). The latter is multiplied by the decision threshold, which represents the estimated harms of the diagnostic intervention, such as patients' burden and use of available resources, against the harms of an outcome event, i.e. missing a urinary tract tumor.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The number of cystoscopies and upper tract imaging modalities (CT or ultrasound) when using a 'urine-first' strategy versus 'care-as-usual'
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year
Cost-effectiveness analysis
Time Frame: Questionnaires are administered at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months.
This will be performed according to the Dutch guideline by administering validated questionnaires.
Questionnaires are administered at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months.
Patient reported outcome measurements (PROMs)
Time Frame: Questionnaires are administered at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months.
Patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) are assessed for patients undergoing cystoscopy and urine collection.
Questionnaires are administered at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 31, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 1, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 6, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 6, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bladder Cancer

Clinical Trials on urine-first strategy

Subscribe