Role of Hypothermia in Endovascular Stroke Thrombectomy (COOLING)

October 25, 2023 updated by: Zhongming Qiu, Xinqiao Hospital of Chongqing

Efficacy and Safety of Endovascular Thrombectomy With Versus Without Hypothermia in Acute Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Reducing or suspending the increase of the infarcted core, i.e., "freezing" the ischemic penumbra, may help improve the efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy. Hypothermia effectively reduces the metabolic level of brain tissue, may prolong the time window for recanalization therapy, and its multi-target therapeutic effect make it one of the most promising neuro-protection approach.

In recent years, hypothermia has been increasingly used to treat acute ischemic stroke. However, its role in acute ischemic stroke is unclear.

The objective of this trial is to investigate whether hypothermia combined with endovascular thrombectomy could add additional benefit without increasing the risk of adverse events such as pneumonia, intracerebral hemorrhage, and mortality.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Aged ≥ 18 years or more;
  2. acute ischemic stroke within 24 hours from onset to randomization;
  3. NIHSS ≥6 points before randomization;
  4. Internal carotid artery, or the middle cerebral artery M1 or M2 occlusion confirmed by CTA/MRA/DSA;
  5. Baseline ASPECTS score ≥ 3 and ≤8, or cerebral infarction core volume < 100ml;
  6. The patient decides to undergo endovascular therapy;
  7. The patient or patient's representative signs a written informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. CT or MR evidence of hemorrhage;
  2. Currently pregnant or lactating (women patients);
  3. Allergy to radiographic contrast agents, or nitinol devices;
  4. Arterial tortuosity and/or other arterial disease that would prevent the device from reaching the target vessel;
  5. Multiple vessel occlusion (e.g., bilateral anterior circulation, or occlusion of both anterior and posterior circulation);
  6. Preexisting neurological or psychiatric disease that would confound the neurological functional evaluations;
  7. Previous bleeding disorders, severe heart, liver or kidney disease, or sepsis;
  8. Brain tumors with mass effect (except meningiomas) that are radiographically pleasant;
  9. Intracranial aneurysm, arteriovenous malformation;
  10. Any terminal illness with life expectancy less than 6 months;
  11. Participating in other clinical trials.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Hypothermia
Patients in Hypothermia group received hypothermia combined with endovascular thrombectomy.
In this trial, intra-arterial select cooling infusion is used to reduce brain tissue temperature to 33-35°C.
Thrombectomy includes treatment with stent retrievers and/or thromboaspiration, balloon angioplasty, stenting, intra-arterial thrombolysis, or the various combinations of these approaches.
Active Comparator: Control
Patients in Control group received endovascular thrombectomy alone.
Thrombectomy includes treatment with stent retrievers and/or thromboaspiration, balloon angioplasty, stenting, intra-arterial thrombolysis, or the various combinations of these approaches.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified Rankin scale score (mRS)
Time Frame: 90 days post-randomization
Modified Rankin scale score (mRS): scores range from 0 to 6, with 0 indicating no disability, 1 no clinically significant disability, 2 slight disability, 3 moderate disability but able to walk unassisted, 4 moderately severe disability, 5 severe disability, and 6 death
90 days post-randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Excellent outcome
Time Frame: 90 days post-randomization
Score of 0-1 on the modified Rankin scale
90 days post-randomization
Functional independence
Time Frame: 90 days post-randomization
Score of 0-2 on the modified Rankin scale
90 days post-randomization
Moderate outcome
Time Frame: 90 days post-randomization
Score of 0-3 on the modified Rankin scale
90 days post-randomization
Early neurological improvement
Time Frame: 72 hours post-randomization
Compared with baseline NIHSS, the 72h NIHSS score is reduced by 8 points or more, or the 72h NIHSS is 0~1 point
72 hours post-randomization
EQ-5D-5L scale score
Time Frame: 90 days post-randomization
The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems.
90 days post-randomization
Successful reperfusion at final angiogram
Time Frame: At the end of angiography or procedure
Successful reperfusion was defined as grade 2b to 3 on the extended Thrombectomy in the Cerebral Ischemia system.
At the end of angiography or procedure
Difference between baseline and within 48h after procedure of infarction core volume (ml)
Time Frame: 48 hours post-randomization
48 hours post-randomization
Reperfusion on follow-up CT or MR angiography
Time Frame: 48 hours post-randomization
48 hours post-randomization
Incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH)
Time Frame: 48 hours post-randomization
using Heidelberg criteria to assess SICH
48 hours post-randomization
incidence of any intracranial hemorrhage (any ICH)
Time Frame: 48 hours post-randomization
48 hours post-randomization
90-day mortality
Time Frame: 90 days post-randomization
90 days post-randomization
Difference of hematocrit between baseline and 24-hour post-randomization
Time Frame: 24-hour post-randomization
24-hour post-randomization
Non-hemorrhagic serious adverse event rate
Time Frame: 90 days post-randomization
including pneumonia, respiratory failure, circulatory failure, cerebral herniation, secondary epilepsy, sepsis, renal failure, acute coronary syndrome, venous thrombosis, etc.
90 days post-randomization
Complications related to operation and device
Time Frame: 90 days post-randomization
vasospasm, arterial rupture, arterial dissection, vascular puncture point complications, etc.
90 days post-randomization
Other serious adverse events
Time Frame: 90 days post-randomization
90 days post-randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

December 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 22, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 31, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 31, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Study Protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan, Informed Consent Form, Clinical Study Report, and Analytic Code will be shared after approval of a proposal from principal investigator 3 years after the trial results are revealed.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

3 years after the trial results are revealed.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

after approval of a proposal from principal investigator

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke, Acute Ischemic

Clinical Trials on hypothermia

3
Subscribe