Natural History Study for Patients With Angelman Syndrome (NatHisAngelman)

May 15, 2025 updated by: Laurent Servais, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liege

A Monocentric, Prospective, Longitudinal and Observational Natural History Study for Patients With Angelman Syndrome in CHR Citadelle Liège : NatHis-Angelman

This study is a 9-year natural history study for patients with Angelman syndrome in Belgium (a genetic neurodevelopmental disorder, affecting 500,000 individuals in the world). It includes a 3-year recruitment phase, a 5 year follow-up and a year to analyze the collected data. The investigators plan to include 30 patients with a semi-annual follow-up for 4 years.

The investigators will collect relevant retrospective and prospective data using age-standardized scales and questionnaires for functional motor assessments and global developmental assessment.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Patients are seen every six months for five years. In these visits, patient have medical review (general medical examination, neurological examination), vital signs (height, weight, respiratory rate, heart rate, blood pressure), cognitive assessment (Bayley-IV), language assessment and questionaire (Bayley-IV, ORCA), motor assessments (Bayley-IV, FMS, Developmental milestones and HINE), quality of life questionnaire (PedsQL, CGI-CASS) and general development questionnaire (Vineland-II).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with Angelman Syndrom

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Genetically confirmed diagnosis of AS
  • 0-99 years
  • Male or Female
  • Participant's carer is willing to give IC/sign a "record of consultation" for participation in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • comorbidity that could potentially affect the results of the study coexists. This

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Continuous movement monitoring using ActiMyo®
Time Frame: 2 years
To improve the design of future clinical trials by validating tools of assessment based on their suitability to be used as prognostic measures.
2 years
Bayley-IV gross motor functions
Time Frame: 2 years
Scale of 58 items of Gross motor (raw score 0 to 116) development evaluation.
2 years
Bayley-IV fine motor functions
Time Frame: 2 years
Scale of 46 items of fine motor scale (raw score 0 to 92) development evaluation.
2 years
Bayley-IV Cognitive
Time Frame: 2 years
Scale of 81 items of cognitive scale development evaluation (raw score 0 to 162).
2 years
Bayley-IV Receptive Communication
Time Frame: 2 years
Scale of 42 items of receptive communication abilities scale in development evaluation (raw score 0 to 84).
2 years
Bayley-IV Expressive Communication
Time Frame: 2 years
Scale of 37 items of expressive communication abilities scale in development evaluation (raw score 0 to 74).
2 years
Functional Mobility Scale (FMS)
Time Frame: 2 years
Scale o 3 items (5, 50 and 500 meters distance of ability to move alone) to classify children's functional mobility, document change over time in the same child and to document change seen following. This scale is scored 1 (moving alone with wheelchair) to 6 (running).
2 years
Developmental Milestones
Time Frame: 2 years
Scale to Evaluate the general gross motor milestones of 6 items global motor ability, from ability to sit without support to walk alone (score by able or not able). .
2 years
Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination (HINE - if under 2 years old)
Time Frame: 2 years
Scale of 8 items to evaluation the mobility in young children, scored 0 (unable) to 4 (able and normal for children age) per items (total raw score from 0 to 32).
2 years
Vineland-II
Time Frame: 2 years

11 subscales of items evaluated with Caregivers interview tool for assessing the level of autonomy and adaptation for all ages.

Subscales are composed as following (higher scores with better the abilites):

  1. Listening and understanding, raw score 0 to 40;
  2. Speaking, raw score 0 to 108,
  3. Reading and writing, raw score 0 to 54,
  4. Self caring, raw score 0 to 82,
  5. Home caring, raw score 0 to 48,
  6. Community living, raw score 0 to 88,
  7. Contact with others, raw score 0 to 76,
  8. Play and use your free time, raw score 0 to 62,
  9. Adapting, raw score 0 to 60,
  10. Gros motor, raw score 0 to 80,
  11. Fine motor, raw score 0 to 72,
2 years
Observed Reported Communication Assessment (ORCA)
Time Frame: 2 years

Caregivers interview of 23 items with subscales to assessing the general communication.

This is a qualitative questionnaire.

2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Global Impression - Improvement - Angelman Syndrome (CGI-I-AS)
Time Frame: 2 years

Caregivers interview of quality of life severity and change in patient with Angelman Syndrome since last 7 days and since the last month.

Part regarding the severity in last 7 days is composed of 9 items scored 0 ("not at all difficult") to 4 ("very difficult"), raw score is between 0 to 36.

Part regarding change in last month is composed of 9 items scored 1 ("very much improved") to 7 ("very much worse"), raw score is between 0 to 63,

2 years
Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL)
Time Frame: 2 years

Caregivers interview of quality of life and family impact in daily life separated in two parts, one regarding the last 7 days and one regarding the last month.

Total raw score for each part is on 100 (100 related to no impact to 0 related to a huge impact).

2 years

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Blood sample collection and DNA extraction and storage
Time Frame: 1 year
To create a DNA biobank
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Laura Vanden Brande, CHR Citadelle

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 10, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 2, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 29, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

May 20, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Angelman Syndrome

Subscribe