Incidence of Acute Injuries in Boxing

February 8, 2024 updated by: University of Iceland

Incidence of Acute Injuries in Boxing in Iceland With Focus on Head Injuries: A Prospective Cohort Study With Questionnaire

A prospective cohort study with 9 months follow up was carried out in 2017-2018. Boxers of both sexes 18 years and older from all 7 boxing clubs in Iceland were invited to participate in the study. Participants filled out a questionnaire on previous injuries during boxing training and competition and were evaluated on the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 3rd edition (SCAT3). Exposure at training and competition was measured and any injuries sustained during the study period were recorded via text messages and phone calls every 2 weeks.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN:

Master of Science (MSc) student monitored the data and guaranteed high data quality. Data was protected according to the Act on Data Protection and the Processing of Personal data (Icelandic law) and stored at the University of Iceland. Data was registered into Microsoft Excel and shared through a secure network with project advisors to promote transparency.

DATA CHECKS:

Data was checked for outliers.

SOURCE DATA VERIFICATION:

Data from printed out questionnaires, text messages and telephone calls was transferred manually to excel by the MSc student who double checked every information to makes sure there were no mistakes.

DATA DICTIONARY:

CTE: chronic traumatic encephalopathy; KO: knock out; TKO: technical knock out; TBI: traumatic brain injury; t-tau protein: total tau protein.

STANDARD OPERATION PROCEDURES:

Boxers were recruited through the MSc students visits to 7 boxing gyms in Iceland. Boxers got an oral introduction, followed by an invitation to participate in the study. After giving a written consent, subjective and objective outcome measures were collected by the MSc student and 2-3 trained research assistants.

Data was analysed by the MSc student using Microsoft Excel and SAS Analytics Software.

The MSc student was responsible for reporting adverse events and change management.

SAMPLE SIZE ASSESSMENT:

Sample size was set at 30 participants. To ensure that enough subjects finished the study after dropouts, for prediction analyses and the opportunity for subgroup analyses, at least 60 subjects were needed.

PLAN FOR MISSING DATA:

If data would have been found to be missing by any reason, each incident would be assessed by the MSc student and her advisors. Imputation methods might be used, the subject involved might have been asked to do a measurement or answer questionnaire again (depending on the time that has passed from the measurement/questionnaires until data is discovered missing) or the subject involved might be removed from the study.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS PLAN:

Data analyses and statistics Database monitoring was performed by the MCs student and an advisor, independent of sponsors and competing interests.

Excel spreadsheets were used to calculate injury incidence per 100 participants, per 1,000 hours of training and per 100 fight participations, while injuries were calculated in number per participant after adjusting for dropouts. Injury incident rate was calculated for each location and each type of injuries. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and t-tests were used to compare means. Chi-square test (χ2) was used to compare injury frequencies of different locations and different types of injuries between different training levels and to compare the difference in injury severity according to sex, training level, whether injury occurred during a training or a bout, age, years of training, injury location and injury type. Logistic regression was used to assess possible risk factors including BMI, age, sex, participants' dominant side, training level, years of boxing, whether participants were participating in other sports, number of hours spent training during the study period, number of hours spent training on average per week, participant competing in a bout during the study period, previous boxing related injuries, and loss in a bout during the study period.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

74

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Reykjavík, Iceland, 102
        • University of Iceland

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Boxers training at one of seven boxing gyms in Iceland

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ≥18 years old
  • currently training actively
  • ≥ 6 months boxing experience OR currently training at an advanced level

Exclusion Criteria:

  • < 18 years old
  • not training actively
  • < 6 months boxing experience OR not currently training at an advanced level

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Questionnaire
Time Frame: 5 minutes
a short self-reported questionnaire on previous boxing-related injuries and demographics
5 minutes
Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 3rd Edition (SCAT3)
Time Frame: 15 minutes

A tool used to assess concussions in athletes 13 years and older. The test has eight subcomponents that are measured in the following order (note that for baseline measurement the first two components were not used):

  1. Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS): Assesses level of consciousness.
  2. Maddocks Score: Assesses orientation to time and place.
  3. Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS).
  4. Standard Assessment of Concussion (SAC).
  5. Neck Examination.
  6. Modified Balance Error Scoring System (mBESS).
  7. Coordination examination (finger-to-nose test).
  8. SAC delayed recall: Patient asked to recall the list of words given earlier.
15 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Árni Árnason, PhD, University of Iceland

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 30, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 29, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 16, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 16, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UI-5487

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Injuries

Subscribe